Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Hey pussy
you still owe me answers.
Did Trump lose the election in November 2020?
Human caused climate change is fact or fiction?
Will You Take The Vaccine?
- Thread starter Unclebaldrick
- Start date
you still owe me answers.
Did Trump lose the election in November 2020?
Human caused climate change is fact or fiction?
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Are you mad that you missed the Capital insurrection, miss the bus?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Maybe he's the pussy in New York whose wife wouldn't let him go.
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
I love these guys. Too bad they get tired of the shit kickin. Lol.
TacoMac
Well-Known Member
It will eventually. Normally, by the time it does, it's too late.
Sort of like getting covid. Getting vaccinated after you get it isn't going to save you.
Budley Doright
Well-Known Member
I went to our retail Center today (hardly ever go there) and its basically shut down to the public but owner and sales staff are there. I walk in to the coffee room and there on the table was a mason jar of bud, opened the fridge and there was beer and wine. I asked to come work there once I stop the working from home stuff lol.
LibertyCap76
Well-Known Member
Ok shitstain, change your tampon and ill answer your questions...
Global warming, naturally occurring or 100% human caused? Id say 50/50, while it is naturally occuring, human actions accelerated it.
Trump? Who gives a fuck about Trump or Biden, they are both equally worthless statists..
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
But you did vote for Trump though.
So what is this mysterious natural force that is causing climate change? Solar cycles? We know about human causes, but I haven't heard a thing about other factors?
Both sides are the same argument and libertarianism is your solution. No government, let Facebook, Amazon and Google run the show, just one underpaid guy with no power in a bare office to protect your interests, sounds like a plan.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
lulz
Thought so. A science denier. Not surprising. The libertarian philosophy was made up in the 1950's by people who outright said that they "eschew science and math". You guys bought into an ideology that is best described as religious belief.
Oh and "I don't like Trump, but..." is a clear signal that you secretly do support him. You are too much of a pussy to admit it. Because, well, so do these stooges:
Which one in that picture is you?
LibertyCap76
Well-Known Member
I never voted for trump, i voted for Jo Jorgensen..Libertarianism is the solution because the other two are utterly worthless..whats the big deal with people marrying who they wish, grow with what they wish and defend themselves with what they wish? its not a hard concept to grasp.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Does that include artillery and nukes? Or perhaps full automatic weapons? Voting for Trump means you have no morals, voting for libertarianism means you have no brain. The democrats want to legalize pot and are pro LBGTQ rights. You sound like you are fear driven and greedy, libertarians are like that, so are the vaccine resistant, the common theme is you believe bullshit and can't think straight or properly evaluate risks.
You need government help and guidance, perhaps a shock collar as well.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
It really doesn't matter. There are so few libertarians their vote didn't affect the election.
That said though, your white man entitlement is showing. Nobody believes your party is worth even a bucket of warm spit yet here you are extolling its virtues. Like the cray cray soap box preacher haranguing passersby, telling them to repent. Like the people passing the street preacher, we are pointing and laughing at you.
printer
Well-Known Member
So people go with life as they want with (I take it) no regard to their place in society as a whole? That is how I see libertarians, the concept is fine if you have big open spaces with few people to butt up against. Once you start getting more people in one area they doing their own things manages to effect the others doing their own thing. at some point they have to realize they have rights but also responsibilities to society. And not causing havoc that causes harm to other members of society is a big responsibility I do not think they have a right to shirk.
Which brings me to the 'bible belt' of my province. Deeply religious people, believing in government should not tell them what to do (many come from countries where the government ran over them), who give of themselves for mission work and the like. But they feel they do not have to be a part of the solution when a virus is messing up the society they belong in. Even on their death bed they believe it is something else and not a virus. Or that it is God's plan and it will happen wether they do anything or not.
So a question to you, what are you bringing to this conversation? What do you plan to add to it?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
@printer I don't think he even knows what you are asking about.
This from the Mises institute, the origination site of the made up ideology that rejects math and science because "confusing".
These great thinkers developed praxeology, a deductive science of human action based on premises known with certainty to be true, and this is what we teach and advocate. Our scholarly work is founded in Misesian praxeology, and in self-conscious opposition to the mathematical modeling and hypothesis-testing that has created so much confusion in neoclassical economics.
Circular logic: We say it is obviously true, so it's obviously true and obviously, science has wrong for the same reason.
This from the Mises institute, the origination site of the made up ideology that rejects math and science because "confusing".
These great thinkers developed praxeology, a deductive science of human action based on premises known with certainty to be true, and this is what we teach and advocate. Our scholarly work is founded in Misesian praxeology, and in self-conscious opposition to the mathematical modeling and hypothesis-testing that has created so much confusion in neoclassical economics.
Circular logic: We say it is obviously true, so it's obviously true and obviously, science has wrong for the same reason.
printer
Well-Known Member
I have no problem giving the 15 year old a chance.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
One wonders how such people balance a check book, or figure out the right change at the store without math... Also reason and logic are generally good things. Pray tell, how does one do physics or economics without math? Economics does have human factors, but they are measured statistically, more math.
I've always had trouble with how all this shit was rolled into the amoral philosophy of "objectivism" seems the opposite of objective, math is always objective 2+2=4
I wonder if Rob Roy ever read any Ayn Rand, he would worship at her altar.
PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure, but I suppose that my boss, his boss, and the big head boss who all have PhD's know that answer better than I, since they came up with the policy.
printer
Well-Known Member
Oh, all with no balls.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
PJ has explained before how he gets paid so he doesn't care if his venues lose money. The big wigs are willing to operate with 25% of capacity. They are making a safe choice, though. Clearly a lot of PJ's colleagues are out of work. PJ's fine so that's all that matters.
I've worked with dickheads like him. They are the worst slackers, the first to complain and nobody likes them.