OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
they're close enough for the constitution, mr. andrew napolitano junior.
Not for your hero Eric Holder. According to him almost 800 years of case law is junk.
But you go ahead and vote Obama.
they're close enough for the constitution, mr. andrew napolitano junior.
So quite a thread I got going here, no real rebuttal, any republicans want to attempt to explain how you can maintain a free market when there is a government or rather how can you even have a truly free market so long as a government exists?
This is the main failure in the Republican philosophy, they advocate for a government and free market at the same time, then they point to the constitution or early America, well the fact is we have never had a truly free market and you can never have one so long as a government exists.
So now if they aren't going to go back to that tired old thing they are going to blame liberals, the other 'big government' advocates. I can go on about liberals/democrats all day and the failings of that philosophy but lets focus on this one.
So quite a thread I got going here, no real rebuttal, any republicans want to attempt to explain how you can maintain a free market when there is a government or rather how can you even have a truly free market so long as a government exists?
This is the main failure in the Republican philosophy, they advocate for a government and free market at the same time, then they point to the constitution or early America, well the fact is we have never had a truly free market and you can never have one so long as a government exists.
So now if they aren't going to go back to that tired old thing they are going to blame liberals, the other 'big government' advocates. I can go on about liberals/democrats all day and the failings of that philosophy but lets focus on this one.
Not for your hero Eric Holder. According to him almost 800 years of case law is junk.
But you go ahead and vote Obama.
if you're overly concerned, just don't move to the middle east, join al qaeda, and actively plot against the united states of america, and you'll be fine.
Too bad there's no proof of any claims you make.
Because this stuff best be done in secret. History shows it's only high quality leaders that behave like this though, obviously.
like i said, don't join a terrorist group and actievly plot against the united states and you will be fine.
like i said, don't join a terrorist group and actievly plot against the united states and you will be fine.
Well, we know Obama has due processed folks already, we don't know or have any proof they were ever terrorists. So I'm not sure why you keep repeating that.
Sadly you are mistaken. They say they want less government but every time one is in charge government gets bigger. It's called "talking out of both sides of your mouth". Meaning the GOP of course. They say one thing and then do the opposite while denying it. Republicans are morons.What makes it useless babble is saying that the right wants "big government"... that equates to verbal asshattery as we all know nothing could be further from the truth.
Edit: also I pointed out it came from Jack Handey to be an asshole, the OP put jack handy, which sounds like something I used to get in high school.
Well, we know Obama has due processed folks already, we don't know or have any proof they were ever terrorists. So I'm not sure why you keep repeating that.
i say it to your face
you mark ass trick
like i just did, aint no snitch shit
how about dont be a disingenuous little kid
i hate liars and thieves . . you definitely barely just above them, your a chicken hawk, trying to hype up others to do what you cant cuase you have no balls
Red I think was talking about you making threats to blow up his poodle. Not sure I remember that thread.
Sadly you are mistaken. They say they want less government but every time one is in charge government gets bigger. It's called "talking out of both sides of your mouth". Meaning the GOP of course. They say one thing and then do the opposite while denying it. Republicans are morons.
Your spelling is terrible, yet I have not seen Bucky correct it even once. Could ShitsHisPants be biased?
Nobody has addressed it because you are simply wrong...
Without government, a free market cannot exist. Without government you have anarchy. Because there are no established laws there is no equality and thus no free trade.
Free trade in the pure sense cannot exist but I have yet to hear of any republicans nor any libertarians demand that.
So, you have created a false argument and attacked it. Congratulations...
So how does government create "free trade" and how can their be a "free market" when government is intervening and changing the market?