People against Ron Paul:
- Want something for free
- Think that life is fair (refer to bullet #1: getting things for free makes life more "fair")
- Think that it's ethical to obligate others to work for someone else (refer to bullet #2: life is fair, even if you have to extort/rob people to make it fair)
- Don't understand basic math (cannot/refuse to understand basic economics or monetary policy)
- Can't read their native language (the constitution is written in English)
- Don't understand natural rights and/or unalienable rights (refer to bullet #5)
- Don't understand the first amendment
- Don't understand property rights
- Think statutes are lawful even if they violate an amendment (cannot/refuse to acknowledge that laws aren't just, if they break an amendment)
- Manipulate the adherence to the constitution, into a form of radicalism
- Trolls (those that know he makes sense, but just don't want to acknowledge it, thus they spew hatred towards those with a logical thought process - ignorance causes this)
Now that about sums it up. Anyone who is against Ron Paul likely falls under at least one, of the above categories, in regards to their specific disagreement(s). If one falls under one of the above categories, it's not so much a result of one's disagreement, rather it's a result of ignorance that causes the disagreement to begin with. It's pretty simple.
Following a written law (constitution) doesn't leave room for ignorance, and that is all Ron Paul wants to do. The other candidates want to do everything in their power to test written law, which is ignorant. That's pretty simple too.