"Why does anybody need an assault weapon"

Why? Fucking Zombies.

I have a right to be able to survive when the shit hits the fan and it continually does throughout history. Zombies, North Koreans, Earth Quakes, Alien Invasions, Solar Flares, the list is endless.

All empires eventually collapse, and when they do, the Huns show up.

lifegoesonbrah said:

Why would I answer your questions when you don't even acknowledge my questioning of your philosophy? Go ahead and make some vague abstract statement like, "the free market is feudalism". Have fun kiddo.

Click to expand...

You don't know anything about it and you seek to ridicule, then change your sig as soon as you find something that you think shows me supporting Laissez Faire. Honestly, you acted like a childish moron in that thread. Like you do in every thread. Like Kynes does. You started a thread to ridicule something you know nothing about. You and several other republicans came to ridicule libertarian socialism but know nothing about it.

At least when I made a thread about anarchocapitalism/voluntaryism/feudalism I have done some reading and criticized. You are only here to ridicule an anarchist because I have a different philosophy. It is a very small minority. Don't come appealing to me to describe it to you now, you only seek to ridicule, not criticize. You misquote and flippantly dismiss.

Your hero Rawn Pawl is just another racist republican. You're just a republican. You're not a libertarian.

can you please define your idea of this anarchists utopia? Top level shit, but anarchy means no govt. so who protects your shit? Or you think noone should own anything? its all gaias anyway? Without govt, or guns who is going to stop somebody from raping my wife or beating me up for looking at them funny? Morals?
Yea fuck govts, sounds great until you think about it for 3 seconds.
I'm confused by your stance is all. you denouce socialism. You dont like what is now called libertarianism, you obviously hate capitalists and republicans. You say your arent a commie.
You cant really think anarchy is a viable option? Even the fucking indians had governments.

oh and im seriously curious not trolling you. I'm positive I disagree with 99.9% of your philosophies but I'm interested in what you say. You are obviously well read and a good debater. A complete kook but thats only an opinion
I've never actually met someone that called themselves an anarchist that wasnt an 18 year old idiot with no life experiance in the real world. It seems you have life experiance and have done your research and came to the conclusion anarchy is what aligns with your thoughts.
How does an anarchists world survive without chaos?

DonPepe said:

We spend billions every year developing new and more efficient ways to kill people and you can't even understand why someone would need something as simple and basic as a tactical rifle?

In a world of nuclear warheads, rail guns, microwave cannons, curse missiles, and mini guns a fucking tactical rifle is the worst thing you can come up with......

consider eliminating some of the more destructive stuff then I will entertain your foolishness about simple rifles.

Click to expand...

This doesn't make any sense. When I get the home invasion, twice now, what do they bring? I can tell you they don't bring rail guns, microwave cannons, cruise missiles, or mini guns. You are on the false premise already.

A modern, light weight, recoil controlled, tactical rifle is just the thing for a single mother to protect her babies. A shotgun, you risk a short shuck, or need to reload a double barrel, and it can also still knock a 90 lb women on her ass in the heat of battle.

The 2nd A gives a RIGHT. You don't have rights like this. So, how could you understand? Just enjoy the fact we police the sea lanes for you.

ilikecheetoes said:

oh and im seriously curious not trolling you. I'm positive I disagree with 99.9% of your philosophies but I'm interested in what you say. You are obviously well read and a good debater. A complete kook but thats only an opinion
I've never actually met someone that called themselves an anarchist that wasnt an 18 year old idiot with no life experiance in the real world. It seems you have life experiance and have done your research and came to the conclusion anarchy is what aligns with your thoughts.
How does an anarchists world survive without chaos?

Click to expand...

an 18 year old idiot with no life experience in the real world. The claims of what he actually is varies a great deal.

ilikecheetoes said:

oh and im seriously curious not trolling you. I'm positive I disagree with 99.9% of your philosophies but I'm interested in what you say. You are obviously well read and a good debater. A complete kook but thats only an opinion
I've never actually met someone that called themselves an anarchist that wasnt an 18 year old idiot with no life experiance in the real world. It seems you have life experiance and have done your research and came to the conclusion anarchy is what aligns with your thoughts.
How does an anarchists world survive without chaos?

Click to expand...

He isn't an anarchist, he doesn't think people should be able to own certain things. He is part of a group called the vagueism movement. Basically they don't really explain their philosophy and try to be as vague as possible. Don't let his 19th century terminology fool you, his dear leader is a professor of linguistics and has taught them to be evasive and sound intelligent.

lol @ vagueism. I havent bothered to stalk his other threads but the few i've dipped my toe in I havent been able to get a clear view of his stance.

ilikecheetoes said:

oh and im seriously curious not trolling you. I'm positive I disagree with 99.9% of your philosophies but I'm interested in what you say. You are obviously well read and a good debater. A complete kook but thats only an opinion
I've never actually met someone that called themselves an anarchist that wasnt an 18 year old idiot with no life experiance in the real world. It seems you have life experiance and have done your research and came to the conclusion anarchy is what aligns with your thoughts.
How does an anarchists world survive without chaos?

Click to expand...

How can you see some as a good debater when they get so pissy when disagreed with?

Crashing vitriol is not debate.

Reading a few of the boneheads from centuries past, when he does not read Bill Clinton, Harold Brown, Don Rumsfeld, and Henry Kissinger, not Will Rogers, and not even Herb Cain makes him a dilettante, plain and simple.

like I said I havent stalked his threads but in this one and the last few he actually seems to be the one keeping a calm head. Baiting you guys and laughing when you curse and spit and spew. Also from the outside it generally looks like him and UB are winning the arguments unfortunately. Although UBs stock answer of you are a racist gets pretty old pretty quick.
But neither of them seem to let emotion affect the fight which is rare for libtards. In fact I was just thinking to myself that this is the only forum ive been on where the right is more angry than the left. SO much cussing and name calling from "our" side. I'll side with you for the most part, although I'm not a republican

So, you missed my post? I'm not a republican. I'm a card carrying Che-ist. I'm registered Independent and as the every so lovely, Uncle Buck stated, we have never seen anything won or lost on this forum. That why my author list varies so.

Who else will mention Will Rogers and Don Rumsfeld in the same sentence?

Now Buck and I will both troll each other when appropriate. (FDR sucked even as a 1 termer)

wait now Im totally confused. You are a commie pinko that wears the tshirt of a murdering sack of shit proudly? Yea I missed that I guess.

and FDR sucked. period, full stop.

ilikecheetoes said:

and FDR sucked. period, full stop.

Click to expand...

So gratifying to see others with this opinion so we don't repeat his madness.

pfft FDR will be looked at as obama light.
You think the TVA and the hoover dam were big. we got b-wheezy care. Everyone will be on the teat before its over. Hell I make a shit ton of money and I bet I could get some EBT/free phone/job training etc.. Its hard to ever get rid of the people giving free (sic) shit to the peoples.
This country is done for, its all downhill from here. I sometimes wonder if maybe we shouldnt have poll tests or landowners only voting. Damn idiots voting for idiots gets you nowhere.

ilikecheetoes said:

wait now Im totally confused. You are a commie pinko that wears the tshirt of a murdering sack of shit proudly? Yea I missed that I guess.

and FDR sucked. period, full stop.

Click to expand...

You missed one where I described sorting out, with the help of law enforcement, my very sordid past. And it almost got me killed. But, having a period to reflect and being totally against Democrats, I came to some other conclusions.

1- Democrat Progressivism is not Left, it represents a sediment into classes. Constant divided class warfare. Animal Farm with double-think. Totalitarian.

2 -We were correct all along, the Republicans have never counted for much and still don't.

3 - It dawned on me that Che would have totally, been in there with the Founders. He would have signed.

And Che hated the elitist dilettantes that think they can buy the peasants favor with goodies for a few, and promise for many. But, dangerous vitriol for the rest. A true Action man. He detested the idea of giving fish instead of teaching to fish. This was a most self-reliant man that went down fighting the puppets of the Catholic Church, like a good 'un.

So, I love him. And the entire message is screwed by progressives, I think. So, I'm not Left. The Left sold out long ago.

I see now that we live in a Che-ist Paradise. I'm home. I don't have to take sides unless I want to. It is all struggle.

It is completely adversarial from top to bottom and so it is a struggle. And it is a cleansing, hard fought, constant wrestle with self rule. It was set up and kick in gear, by very advanced thinking Che-ists, indeed.

When I saw that, I remained calm, continued to meditate my way out of jail, and resumed the struggle...as a citizen, re-born. And successful enough by my own measure. But, I take no political sides save the Che-ist Manifesto, called the US Constitution.


(FDR sucked even at a 2 termer)

Doer said:

This doesn't make any sense. When I get the home invasion, twice now, what do they bring? I can tell you they don't bring rail guns, microwave cannons, cruise missiles, or mini guns. You are on the false premise already.

A modern, light weight, recoil controlled, tactical rifle is just the thing for a single mother to protect her babies. A shotgun, you risk a short shuck, or need to reload a double barrel, and it can also still knock a 90 lb women on her ass in the heat of battle.

The 2nd A gives a RIGHT. You don't have rights like this. So, how could you understand? Just enjoy the fact we police the sea lanes for you.

Click to expand...

I'm sorry. What?

You say my post doesn't make any since then reply with this?!?

Why would you even think anyone would bring a rail gun, microwave cannon, or cruse missile to rob your house. The fact that you thought i was suggesting it leads me to seriously question your since ability to offer valuable insight in this discussion.

You also seem to be laboring under the delusion that i support gun regulations, which i do not.

I do currently have the right to own, bare, and carry arms. I rarely carry one but own a few, I use them mostly for hunting and recreational shooting but do own a few home defense weapons for protection of my home.

You also seem to suggest that you are a officer of the law here in the US, and that's down right terrifying. The way you lost your cool and typed out a hostile response with out even understanding the situation. Followed by insulting, aggressive language directed at an anonymous internet user who oddly enough seems to be supporting your argument weather you realize it or not. I don't personally have any sea lanes but thank you for policing them for me anyways.


EDIT: oh wait, i may have misunderstood some of your post..... do you think i am in mexico or some country other then the US? if so that explains a little of your post.

Oh, man...troll bait. Boo Hoo hudist are you? Get off the slipper slope, I say if you support the second. If you feel pounced upon and and aggressively insulted and respond like your anonymous ego is dangling off your actual sleeve, then I suggest you carefully swim back to the shallow end and try to stop crying. I'm actually sorry you feel insulted, but that's not my problem.

What did you mean by all that rail gun strange alternate of choice phrasing then...sarcasm? Pretty thin skinned if you present that.

BTW, my forum mate, you wish to instruct me? You have not seem aggressive yet. I have to save that for some of the VPs I work with. That's their thing....weird, but tiring.

Oh, and you might want to knock off the assumption spew until you make it back to where your feet are on the bottom.

I'm not a cop. But, thanks.

DonPepe said:

I'm sorry. What?

You say my post doesn't make any since then reply with this?!?

Why would you even think anyone would bring a rail gun, microwave cannon, or cruse missile to rob your house. The fact that you thought i was suggesting it leads me to seriously question your since ability to offer valuable insight in this discussion.

You also seem to be laboring under the delusion that i support gun regulations, which i do not.

I do currently have the right to own, bare, and carry arms. I rarely carry one but own a few, I use them mostly for hunting and recreational shooting but do own a few home defense weapons for protection of my home.

You also seem to suggest that you are a officer of the law here in the US, and that's down right terrifying. The way you lost your cool and typed out a hostile response with out even understanding the situation. Followed by insulting, aggressive language directed at an anonymous internet user who oddly enough seems to be supporting your argument weather you realize it or not. I don't personally have any sea lanes but thank you for policing them for me anyways.


EDIT: oh wait, i may have misunderstood some of your post..... do you think i am in mexico or some country other then the US? if so that explains a little of your post.

Click to expand...

Don't mind him, most of his post's are non-sensical, geriatric dribbles with large doses of ignorance...

Doer said:

Oh, man...troll bait. Boo Hoo hudist are you? Get off the slipper slope, I say if you support the second. If you feel pounced upon and and aggressively insulted and respond like you anonymous ego is dangling off your actual sleeve, then I suggest you careful swim back to the shallow end and try to stop crying.

What did you mean by all that rail gun strange alternate of choice phrasing then...sarcasm? Pretty thin skinned if you present that.

BTW, my fourm mate, you wish to instruct me? You have not seem aggressive yet. I have to save for some of the VPs I work for. That's their thing....weird, but tiring.

Click to expand...

i realized i misunderstood you post,... my bad... you couldn't pass the BLET so no worries about you being a cop.

I was listing top end weapon technologies to give some scale to the assault rifle / tactical rifle plight. I am sorry if it was not clear enough for you.

No worries man, i was being sarcastic, you make me a little sad for humans as a whole but pity is my strongest emotion concerning you.

You make me seem that i was not reader rite. I is understand how we felt where the time come to give what is read.

Is marijuana use considered chronic when you can longer put together coherent sentences? or is that just called stupid?

DonPepe said:

i realized i misunderstood you post,... my bad... you couldn't pass the BLET so no worries about you being a cop.

I was listing top end weapon technologies to give some scale to the assault rifle / tactical rifle plight. I am sorry if it was not clear enough for you.

No worries man, i was being sarcastic, you make me a little sad for humans as a whole but pity is my strongest emotion when reading your posts.

You make me seem that i was not reader rite. I is understand how we felt where the time come to give what is read.

Click to expand...

OK, I'm sorry then. I am a harbinger of sad and glad. Che-ism is sort of the opposite of Tao-ism in that way. Tao-ists see the harmony and Che-ist see the struggle with existence of even dust. (and much of our struggle is against dust!)

But, the Tao-ist would point to the Yin-Yang and the dot of opposite in the two colors intertwined. They say, there is the struggle.

And sorry if I show too much ass. I'm still reeling under the fact that even a washed up 3 termer like FDR can have some wild effects in Paradise. And Paradise can take it.
(no he was only a 2 termer....really?)

BLET, funny! I had to look that up. The thing, I have a much better chance of passing even the physical part than I ever had before. Kettlebell training.

But, no gun, no bullet for me without a pardon. hee hee...I'm even thinking to apply for that...why not?

Why? Hey, friend, you might want to edit that last sentence. Bucky keeps careful notes of all our errors.