kpmarine
Well-Known Member
Why is it that I see so much concern about presidential elections, but not a word about congressional elections? The legislative branch has the power to amend the constitution, ratify treaties, override presidential veto, make the budget, LEGALIZE MARIJUANA, etc. The executive branch has what? Veto? Pretty much everything the president does must be approved by, or can be canceled out by, some sort of congressional action. The "founding fathers" never wanted the general population to elect the president, hence the electoral college. The supreme court is the only branch with more power. The president appoints justices, but the senate has to approve that too.
Think about it for a second... Though they didn't declare war in the formal sense, congress did approve the military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan.(For you people that just blame Bush for that.) Congress had to approve every bailout that happened. Congress also approved our actions in Libya.(For you people that just blame Obama for that.) These are just a few of the examples that come immediately to mind. I'm only 24, and have only recently taken a real interest in such things, so maybe I'm missing something. But I have to ask: Why don't I see nearly as much (if any) debate about congressional elections, compared to the presidential elections?
Think about it for a second... Though they didn't declare war in the formal sense, congress did approve the military activities in Iraq and Afghanistan.(For you people that just blame Bush for that.) Congress had to approve every bailout that happened. Congress also approved our actions in Libya.(For you people that just blame Obama for that.) These are just a few of the examples that come immediately to mind. I'm only 24, and have only recently taken a real interest in such things, so maybe I'm missing something. But I have to ask: Why don't I see nearly as much (if any) debate about congressional elections, compared to the presidential elections?