Why do HID lights have better penetration?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Show me the mathematical errors please.
I pointed out several times your Bibled numbers are highly inflated (or downplayed when it's about HID) and do no reflect reality. See the other thread in which I explained the difference with reality... if Sunnie hasn't deleted that one yet. Weird selective moderating going here but what else is new...

"HPS is 35% efficient, LED is 49% efficient" Just a typical example.

It's like saying a car can go 80 miles per hour and a boat 40 and then conclude you'll go from point A to B 2 times faster in the car thus the car is the better choice or superior. You don't care about helping growers make an informed decision. The whole efficiency thing you guys are blinded by measures just one thing, your bias.
 

bicit

Well-Known Member
I pointed out several times your Bibled numbers are highly inflated (or downplayed when it's about HID) and do no reflect reality. See the other thread in which I explained the difference with reality... if Sunnie hasn't deleted that one yet. Weird selective moderating going here but what else is new...

"HPS is 35% efficient, LED is 49% efficient" Just a typical example.

It's like saying a car can go 80 miles per hour and a boat 40 and then conclude you'll go from point A to B 2 times faster in the car thus the car is the better choice or superior. You don't care about helping growers make an informed decision. The whole efficiency thing you guys are blinded by measures just one thing, your bias.
Please quote it. I want you to break it down for me nice and slow like. Enlighten me.
 
Last edited:

churchhaze

Well-Known Member
I pointed out several times your Bibled numbers are highly inflated (or downplayed when it's about HID) and do no reflect reality. See the other thread in which I explained the difference with reality... if Sunnie hasn't deleted that one yet. Weird selective moderating going here but what else is new...

"HPS is 35% efficient, LED is 49% efficient" Just a typical example.

It's like saying a car can go 80 miles per hour and a boat 40 and then conclude you'll go from point A to B 2 times faster in the car thus the car is the better choice or superior. You don't care about helping growers make an informed decision. The whole efficiency thing you guys are blinded by measures just one thing, your bias.


Except for the fact that you didn't say anything meaningful.
 

churchhaze

Well-Known Member
You see guys.. that math you did.. it's like a car... no ... it's more like a truck.... it's moving fast.... it's moving slow.... now you see why 35% makes no sense. I'm just trying to help people make informed decisions. Why does everyone hate me ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top