white on white violence

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Of course we can talk about the hyper-violence of so called "white culture". Just because the snowflakes will be triggered doesn't mean that we can't exercise our 1A rights. That's freedom of speech.
i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civil

whites are prone to hyper-violence, like the holocaust, chattel slavery, imperialism, slaughter of natives, and so forth

but if we talk about white on white violence, will we be tarnished as politically incorrect?

i just want to be civil. i wish thoughts and prayers on our first responders
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civil

whites are prone to hyper-violence, like the holocaust, chattel slavery, imperialism, slaughter of natives, and so forth

but if we talk about white on white violence, will we be tarnished as politically incorrect?

i just want to be civil. i wish thoughts and prayers on our first responders
Political correctness is all about avoiding gratuitous insult but has nothing to do with avoiding facts or using clumsy language to avoid using a charged word.

Saying that the mass murderer is a white man is reasonable, especially if the reporter is consistent in naming which race/gender when reporting on mass murders. The reason we've generally gotten away from saying if a mass murderer is white is because the slayer is almost always a white man to the point that nowadays assuming mass murderers are white men should just go without saying. No need to make a big deal about it. Still, for consistency's sake we should probably call out white men when one of their own does the deed even though saying so would be repetitive.

I hope this post hasn't insulted anybody.
 

Andrewk420

Well-Known Member
White males have been the driving force of violence since mainstream history has been kept. Almost as if white/European males are proud of it.

One of the things that bothers me most about white males, is the fact that they are only capable of being tough when there is zero repercussion (like on the internet) or they have the element of surprise or numbers. It seems like if you get a lot of white males together in one place, and they have a top monkey to unite under, they feel stronger and are even more prone to violence.​
 

Gilligans Island

Well-Known Member
i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civil

whites are prone to hyper-violence, like the holocaust, chattel slavery, imperialism, slaughter of natives, and so forth

but if we talk about white on white violence, will we be tarnished as politically incorrect?

i just want to be civil. i wish thoughts and prayers on our first responders
Dude, let your kid out so he can play.... Geeeeze!
 

blu3bird

Well-Known Member
Political correctness is all about avoiding gratuitous insult but has nothing to do with avoiding facts or using clumsy language to avoid using a charged word.

Saying that the mass murderer is a white man is reasonable, especially if the reporter is consistent in naming which race/gender when reporting on mass murders. The reason we've generally gotten away from saying if a mass murderer is white is because the slayer is almost always a white man to the point that nowadays assuming mass murderers are white men should just go without saying. No need to make a big deal about it. Still, for consistency's sake we should probably call out white men when one of their own does the deed even though saying so would be repetitive.

I hope this post hasn't insulted anybody.
I find this post racially insensitive. Reported
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
every presidential assassination or attempt was done by a white male

more white on white violence. it has been going on for centuries
 
Top