i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civilOf course we can talk about the hyper-violence of so called "white culture". Just because the snowflakes will be triggered doesn't mean that we can't exercise our 1A rights. That's freedom of speech.
Political correctness is all about avoiding gratuitous insult but has nothing to do with avoiding facts or using clumsy language to avoid using a charged word.i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civil
whites are prone to hyper-violence, like the holocaust, chattel slavery, imperialism, slaughter of natives, and so forth
but if we talk about white on white violence, will we be tarnished as politically incorrect?
i just want to be civil. i wish thoughts and prayers on our first responders
Dude, let your kid out so he can play.... Geeeeze!i don't want to be politically incorrect here, i just want to be civil
whites are prone to hyper-violence, like the holocaust, chattel slavery, imperialism, slaughter of natives, and so forth
but if we talk about white on white violence, will we be tarnished as politically incorrect?
i just want to be civil. i wish thoughts and prayers on our first responders
I find this post racially insensitive. ReportedPolitical correctness is all about avoiding gratuitous insult but has nothing to do with avoiding facts or using clumsy language to avoid using a charged word.
Saying that the mass murderer is a white man is reasonable, especially if the reporter is consistent in naming which race/gender when reporting on mass murders. The reason we've generally gotten away from saying if a mass murderer is white is because the slayer is almost always a white man to the point that nowadays assuming mass murderers are white men should just go without saying. No need to make a big deal about it. Still, for consistency's sake we should probably call out white men when one of their own does the deed even though saying so would be repetitive.
I hope this post hasn't insulted anybody.