Which is the most valuable to protect?

schuylaar said:

Polls aren't shows- besides what an unusual selection of the four presented as choices.

Click to expand...

Were I at work, the answer would be “the less reactive hydroxyl group”. Were my work military, a likely answer is “my ally’s exposed flank”. Were I an athlete, the reply depends on my sex.

“Protect” means different things to different people and in different situations. Op needs to define terms unless op enjoys being pwnt on semantics.

cannabineer said:

yes because it is why the GOP hates CRT. It reveals systematic, systemic injustice toward nonwhite nonmale Americans. Your task is to find a source that isn’t from Fox etc. whose veracity is known bad.

Click to expand...

Did you know CRT is taught college level graduate studies and pretty much not before. As a college graduate, I had to look it up since I've never heard of it.

We need to start a really good conspiracy theory and see if it takes hold..someone would have to go over to Truth Social and plant it though..who's game? It'll be our conspiracy so we'll know it's us.

cannabineer said:

Were I at work, the answer would be “the less reactive hydroxyl group”. Were my work military, a likely answer is “my ally’s exposed flank”. Were I an athlete, the reply depends on my sex.

“Protect” means different things to different people and in different situations. Op needs to define terms unless op enjoys being pwnt on semantics.

Click to expand...

I think he's asking which is the most valuable and just didn't ask it correctly because translator isn't going to take his language and automatically put in proper English form.

schuylaar said:

Did you know CRT is taught college level graduate studies and pretty much not before. As a college graduate, I had to look it up since I've never heard of it.

We need to start a really good conspiracy theory and see if it takes hold..someone would have to go over to Truth Social and plant it though..who's game? It'll be our conspiracy so we'll know it's us.

Click to expand...

It is as dishonest as GQP agents talking about pedophilic “grooming” of the prepubescent. It’s never too late to manufacture a scandal that has tactically offended evangelicals at its root, and advances the dominionist agenda as a result.

I’ll decline on formulating a hoax. I don’t want to contribute to the wholesale erosion of independent thought currently going on. Fighting evil with evil tends not to help.

schuylaar said:

I think he's asking which is the most valuable and just didn't ask it correctly because translator isn't going to take his language and automatically put in proper English form.

Click to expand...

indeed. “Valuable” is not an objective term. Let’s establish an airtight envelope of agreed-upon definition before fitting that definition to specific instances.

cannabineer said:

yes because it is why the GOP hates CRT. It reveals systematic, systemic injustice toward nonwhite nonmale Americans. Your task is to find a source that isn’t from Fox etc. whose veracity is known bad.

Click to expand...

You think my task is to source your premise.

ActionianJacksonian said:

You think my task is to source your premise.

Click to expand...

Yours; see post 241.

cannabineer said:

Were I at work, the answer would be “the less reactive hydroxyl group”. Were my work military, a likely answer is “my ally’s exposed flank”. Were I an athlete, the reply depends on my sex.

“Protect” means different things to different people and in different situations. Op needs to define terms unless op enjoys being pwnt on semantics.

Click to expand...

Most proficient means of the day.
Edit: clearly says arms
Cliff notes: protect with firearms.

cannabineer said:

Yours; see post 241.

Click to expand...

241, 233, 224, 220, 218, 217, 212

Or did you just skip pages?

schuylaar said:

We need to start a really good conspiracy theory and see if it takes hold..someone would have to go over to Truth Social and plant it though..who's game? It'll be our conspiracy so we'll know it's us.

Click to expand...

We could have signet rings

Sir Napsalot said:

We could have signet rings

Click to expand...

Let me tell you the biggest Freemason Building in existence is in my town. As large as the Supreme Court facing City Hall. You can't go near to look they have discrete roping along the bottom of the stairs.

bam0813 said:

. . . . . . . . . . . I guess what im bothered by most is the pig pen you speak of . Its just my opinion there isnt a single honest one to get facts from. I all see and hear is my source is honest and accurate and reliable no mine is . Bullshit they all mislead . . . . .

Click to expand...

Try the Newhour for a couple three weeks and then say there is not an honest news site. As I said, it is paid for by the viewers with a few underwriters. Any time the news touches on one of their underwriters, they say up front that so and so is an underwriter of the Newshour. Then they go ahead and report the news. They hire the best and the brightest. Not the best looking. Until NBC news lured the big one away, they had the widest and skinniest correspondents in TV.

Also the ten minutes of opinion they have per week is obviously opinion. They have the same two columnists on each week. (we are still mourning the passing of Mark Shields)

I don't know what news sites you use, but the things you were repeating were all easily debunked. Just looking to see if the site is a real newspaper is a good start. Like the Columbus Dispatch and Indianapolis Star, the papers that reported about the 10 year old rape victim. Real newspapers try hard to get the story right before going to press. When in doubt, google the news site and byline just to see what else they have available.

NPR is another source that is paid for by the users. They have millions of folks they have to please. The way they please them is with honest and open reportage. Here is a story about the story.


As it turns out, the girl's mother had reported the rape to Franklin County's Children Services agency, which referred a complaint to Columbus police on June 22nd, according to Detective Huhn's testimony Wednesday. According to Huhn, the abortion took place in Indianapolis on June 30 - the day before the article about her plight was posted by the Star.