WHERES THE REAL GROWERS! BRING YOUR A GAME TO THIS POST!

S

spitxfire

Member
LOL, said my piece, and if you go back, I posted a funny pic when entering the thread, and was just here to see Hammerheads response. I stated clearly my opinion on omri, you asked me to "type legibly", I caps it for you, since you're blind, then you implicitly state, I have no evidence to back it up. Key word is implicit. Because I can read what you typed, but thats not what you meant. I just thought it was funny how you stated "listen to people with evidence not opinion" but youre proving to do anything but that... ANyways peace. If I delete my acct, will the posts I posted stay up?
 
Dankfactory

Dankfactory

Well-Known Member
AlphaPhase said:
Hydro and organics are great. Neither better than the next for a personal gardener though, hydro wins on commercial scale by a land slide. Don't blame the nutes used (non "organic" are not dangerous, they are pure and contain less harmful chemicals than organic do, people just need to read about these things instead of hearing something bad and passing it on with). All in all, if it tastes and burns like shit, blame the grower not the elements feeding the plants. If people feel better eating organic, by all means have fun. Growing organic, go for it. Just don't knock the mineral salts before knowing what they consist of. Don't just accept that hippy bill said so because he heard it from hippy Bob and hippy Jay said so too. That doesn't make it true.. :hump:


Just my 2 cents. And here's some bud porn so you know I know how to grow the dank. I know everyone loves pics

View attachment 3413675
Click to expand...
"Hydro and Organics." What an amusing statement. As if the topic can be comparatively analyzed within the confines of those two examples. I'm afraid it's not that simple Homes.

I would imagine that by now, everyone knows that Salts are Salts are Salts. Nobody is debating that reality. Iron is Iron. Boron is Boron. How one arrives at that ionic state is the critical point here, not simply that the ionic state was achieved. How and what is processed to get to the ionic form is why the phrase "other ingredients" appears on a package of product labeled as 'fertilizer' (and 'pesticide'). These ingredients do not have to be disclosed! Only the advertised benefit, or guaranteed analysis is what truly appears on a synthetic nutrient bottle. The rest of the stuff in a bottle or box or bag(chelated toxic metals and who knows what else) is at the whim of the manufacturer.

While there can indeed still be toxic elements present in purely organic material, (i.e: cadmium),
the debate does not simply end with the ideology of " Synthetics and Organics is all the same dudes, cus it's just Salts! Check out my little Humping emoticon, cus I just fuckin PWN'd this topic compadre!!!!"

Wrong.

A quality synthetic can absolutely be no different than Organic and the end product would not be any healthier for you to eat or smoke either way, but you simply don't know what else you're getting a lot of the time with synthetics.

I'll stick with Organics, personally.
 
phil k

phil k

Well-Known Member
green ... green... weeeeeeeeeed.... builds up a cloud in my head.... makes me forget what i said...... and makes me feel fine....
 
phil k

phil k

Well-Known Member
definitely agree... you can easily grow a quality grow with anything synthetic... still sticking with organics here!

Dankfactory said:
"Hydro and Organics." What an amusing statement. As if the topic can be comparatively analyzed within the confines of those two examples. I'm afraid it's not that simple Homes.

I would imagine that by now, everyone knows that Salts are Salts are Salts. Nobody is debating that reality. Iron is Iron. Boron is Boron. How one arrives at that ionic state is the critical point here, not simply that the ionic state was achieved. How and what is processed to get to the ionic form is why the phrase "other ingredients" appears on a package of product labeled as 'fertilizer' (and 'pesticide'). These ingredients do not have to be disclosed! Only the advertised benefit, or guaranteed analysis is what truly appears on a synthetic nutrient bottle. The rest of the stuff in a bottle or box or bag(chelated toxic metals and who knows what else) is at the whim of the manufacturer.

While there can indeed still be toxic elements present in purely organic material, (i.e: cadmium),
the debate does not simply end with the ideology of " Synthetics and Organics is all the same dudes, cus it's just Salts! Check out my little Humping emoticon, cus I just fuckin PWN'd this topic compadre!!!!"

Wrong.

A quality synthetic can absolutely be no different than Organic and the end product would not be any healthier for you to eat or smoke either way, but you simply don't know what else you're getting a lot of the time with synthetics.

I'll stick with Organics, personally.
Click to expand...
 
AlphaPhase

AlphaPhase

Well-Known Member
All ferts and soils are listed on a gov website breaking down exactly what isn't on the labels, you can check for yourself if you like. You'd be amazed at the heavy metals in organics compared to non organics. I think this topic should be laid to rest though. To each thier own.
 
Dankfactory

Dankfactory

Well-Known Member
AlphaPhase said:
All ferts and soils are listed on a gov website breaking down exactly what isn't on the labels, you can check for yourself if you like. You'd be amazed at the heavy metals in organics compared to non organics. I think this topic should be laid to rest though. To each thier own.
Click to expand...
Yes. I would like to see this "government website," which monitors and lists all of the extraneous ingredients for every nutrient company currently operating including internationally, where much of the nutrient trade lies, along with how they accomplish their analysis.
That would be great. Just a link. We don't need to hijack the thread.

In the meantime, while we're all waiting, indeed, back on track. One of my six tables.
 

Attachments

shishkaboy

shishkaboy

Well-Known Member
spitxfire said:
LOL, said my piece, and if you go back, I posted a funny pic when entering the thread, and was just here to see Hammerheads response. I stated clearly my opinion on omri, you asked me to "type legibly", I caps it for you, since you're blind, then you implicitly state, I have no evidence to back it up. Key word is implicit. Because I can read what you typed, but thats not what you meant. I just thought it was funny how you stated "listen to people with evidence not opinion" but youre proving to do anything but that... ANyways peace. If I delete my acct, will the posts I posted stay up?
Click to expand...
I think so. Ask admin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top