What Exxon Has Long Known

Uhh you DO know there is one candidate that is not being bankrolled by billionaires and PACs...

Oh, you mean Trump. You're right, no PAC and no billionaires bankrolling him, just spending his own cash. He is also the only candidate openly telling people to keep their money and not donate it to his campaign.

Thanks, I forgot about him.
 
Oh, you mean Trump. You're right, no PAC and no billionaires bankrolling him, just spending his own cash. He is also the only candidate openly telling people to keep their money and not donate it to his campaign.

Thanks, I forgot about him.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/afte...-donations-trump-starts-an-online-fundraiser/

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=2016&id=N00023864&type=f

Shhhh you're wrong. Bye bye. now let's keep talking about Exxon and covering up climate change.
 
Trump's average unsolicited donation comes in at 50$ a pop. If anonymous people want to donate to Trump,
then what's the problem?
.... Which millionaire or billionaire is soliciting the Trump campaign?
 
I like how you replied to a comment that wasn't directed at you as if the mere mention of "right wing idiot" was enough to get your attention.

You are what you are.

It did get my attention, as the member that made it was blaming the wrong people for diverting the thread. The insult you slung is inconsequential. I've developed a filter that kicks in when slobbering morons start insulting the intelligence of their betters.
 
Oh, you mean Trump. You're right, no PAC and no billionaires bankrolling him, just spending his own cash. He is also the only candidate openly telling people to keep their money and not donate it to his campaign.

Thanks, I forgot about him.

I'll be taking his advice. It might just be the one and only time, but I thought I'd be open-minded.
 
Did any of the leaked documents discuss what Exxon's strategy might be in the face of global warming and a growing scientific and political consensus to do something about it?

Let me guess; they used the Koch brothers strategy; deny, confuse and distract so they can continue to profit at the expense of the planet.
 
Did any of the leaked documents discuss what Exxon's strategy might be in the face of global warming and a growing scientific and political consensus to do something about it?

Let me guess; they used the Koch brothers strategy; deny, confuse and distract so they can continue to profit at the expense of the planet.
They actually hired some of the same folks who made a living denying the harms of smoking tobacco.
 
I've developed a filter that kicks in when slobbering morons start insulting the intelligence of their betters.

then why did you not kick your own ass for predicting a 54-40 romney win, even as i told you how wrong and deceived you were?
 
then why did you not kick your own ass for predicting a 54-40 romney win, even as i told you how wrong and deceived you were?
2012? Romney was a weak candidate. Picked by the establishment republicans and the media.
It won't happen in 2016. Romney is garbage
 
2012? Romney was a weak candidate. Picked by the establishment republicans and the media.
It won't happen in 2016. Romney is garbage

your buddy bought into the "skewed polls" shit just like you did, beenthere.

your idiocy being less recent does not make it less idiotic, or less noteworthy, or les sinformative about what kind of moron you are to buy such shit and eat it up.
 
Back
Top