What about Kasich?

UncleBuck said:
so when are you going to admit that your policy of racial segregation is harmful?

maybe once you evolve beyond the 2nd grade attempts at insult?
Click to expand...

I don't have policies regarding a persons race in the way that you insinuate. I judge people as individuals. You do not.

The funny part of the "insult" is the infantility (sic) and repetition of it, Poopy Pants. Clearly anyone that would drop a steaming load of dung on a floor in a desperate attempt to seek acceptance by his peers, should be familiar with that. Don't I get any cred for not calling you stupid?
 
UncleBuck said:
actually, bernie is beating the GOP harder than hillary is.

ya retarded anti-semite fuck.
Click to expand...

The only thing Bernie is beating is his dick while writing about it in some dank basement.

I know you get turned on by this stuff, so....I grant you permission to return to typing with both hands and clean your Poopy Pants.

0454.jpg
 
UncleBuck said:
then why have you stated that it should be legal to deny service to someone based solely on their skin color?
Click to expand...

Nice try Poopy Pants. I have said it's wrong to use force to initiate a human interaction. It's also wrong to PREVENT humans from interacting if all the involved parties agree to it and their actions are confined to the involved agreeing parties.

I take the liberty position, you take the prohibitionist position. No surprise there.
 
Rob Roy said:
Nice try Poopy Pants. I have said it's wrong to use force to initiate a human interaction. It's also wrong to PREVENT humans from interacting if all the involved parties agree to it and their actions are confined to the involved agreeing parties.

I take the liberty position, you take the prohibitionist position. No surprise there.
Click to expand...

I thought he took the squatting position...
 
Rob Roy said:
Nice try Poopy Pants. I have said it's wrong to use force to initiate a human interaction. It's also wrong to PREVENT humans from interacting if all the involved parties agree to it and their actions are confined to the involved agreeing parties.

I take the liberty position, you take the prohibitionist position. No surprise there.
Click to expand...
We currently have just that.

If I own a private club I can restrict access to my hearts desire.

If I own a publicly available store I lose that ability for fairly obvious reasons. If I'm engaged in selling goods and services that people need I can't restrict access for arbitrary reasons.

But if I own a golf course I can keep it to the good ol boys.

That is the law.
 
ThickStemz said:
We currently have just that.

If I own a private club I can restrict access to my hearts desire.

If I own a publicly available store I lose that ability for fairly obvious reasons. If I'm engaged in selling goods and services that people need I can't restrict access for arbitrary reasons.

But if I own a golf course I can keep it to the good ol boys.

That is the law.
Click to expand...






I'm not much of a golfer, but if was, I wouldn't use a golf course that discriminates based on race or sexual orientation etc.

I'm also not much for running others lives, so if you owned a golf course and wanted to only permit left handed people riding glitter bedecked ponies to go there, I'd say that's up to you. Although, I might consider putting you out of business, by opening a more welcoming golf course across the road from you.

The law? Meh, fuck the law. Do the right thing and live your own life and let others do the same.
 
Rob Roy said:
I'm not much of a golfer, but if was, I wouldn't use a golf course that discriminates based on race or sexual orientation etc.

I'm also not much for running others lives, so if you owned a golf course and wanted to only permit left handed people riding glitter bedecked ponies to go there, I'd say that's up to you. Although, I might consider putting you out of business, by opening a more welcoming golf course across the road from you.

The law? Meh, fuck the law. Do the right thing and live your own life and let others do the same.
Click to expand...
Fuck the law?..

When Thomas Cromwell was on trial for his life for his slight agains Henry VIII he had a brilliant exchange with the judge.

He was trying to point out that he had broken no law and that his convictionwould be illegal.

He said "you'd break the law to catch the devil, wouldn't you?"

The judge replied, "I'd cut down every law in the Kingdom if I could punish and catch that monster."

Cromwell replied, "and when you caught him and he turned on you, in that moment of grave danger, where would you turn for protection, having cut down all the laws that would save you?"

In a country ruled by law and not man the law is one of the most, nay the most important part of society."
 
ThickStemz said:
Fuck the law?..

When Thomas Cromwell was on trial for his life for his slight agains Henry VIII he had a brilliant exchange with the judge.

He was trying to point out that he had broken no law and that his convictionwould be illegal.

He said "you'd break the law to catch the devil, wouldn't you?"

The judge replied, "I'd cut down every law in the Kingdom if I could punish and catch that monster."

Cromwell replied, "and when you caught him and he turned on you, in that moment of grave danger, where would you turn for protection, having cut down all the laws that would save you?"

In a country ruled by law and not man the law is one of the most, nay the most important part of society."
Click to expand...


Perhaps you missed what I said after "fuck the law", which was "Do the right thing and live your own life and let others do the same". In other words, the law is often wrong and when it is, ignore it or break it. For instance a runaway slave was "breaking the law", so are Cannabis users etc.

If the law coincides with what is right, do THAT, not because it is a law, but because it is right.

When freedom is outlawed only outlaws will be free.
 
UncleBuck said:
oh, so you had no point. no rebuttal.

in that case, what i said about you being a racial segregationist stands.
Click to expand...

No, I'm just not up for crushing (again) you in a one sided debate over subjects we've covered before.

So, uh, can a person delegate a right they do not possess?
 
Rob Roy said:
No, I'm just not up for crushing (again) you in a one sided debate over subjects we've covered before.

So, uh, can a person delegate a right they do not possess?
Click to expand...

you claimed that people were being forced to serve others. that is not possible unless someone was forced to open a store to the public.

so it's not that you are not up for a debate, it is that you have already lost by lying and making shit up.

you are a racial segregationist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

doublejj
TRUMP’S TEAM IS GRILLING CIVIL SERVANTS ABOUT WHO THEY VOTED FOR: REPORT
Replies
1
Views
234
Chronic1978
Chronic1978
hanimmal
AP News: Trump campaign’s Russia contacts ‘grave’ threat, Senate says
Replies
7
Views
709
hanimmal
hanimmal
H
Mimosa Evo experience & advice
Replies
3
Views
153
Southside112
Southside112
hanimmal
Third Party Shitcannery, the mega-richs' hopes of Netanyahu'ing Trump back into office.
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
hanimmal
hanimmal
M
What are you're steps you take when you front someone weed and then they don't respond back?
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Bud man 43
B
Back
Top