What about Kasich?

He also has some racist tendencies. He once told me I should "thank a black person" (alive today) for the work of long ago dead black people.

That came from his idea that based solely on similarity of race with dead people, people alive today should somehow be thanked for work other people did. From his racist slip up, it's easy to infer that he judges people not as individuals, rather on their race.

He does have a history of failing to clean up after himself too.

don't you favor a policy in which it is once again legal to kick people out of stores and deny them loans based solely on their skin color?
 
don't you favor a policy in which it is once again legal to kick people out of stores and deny them loans based solely on their skin color?


I favor property owners having the final say on how their property and their body is dispositioned regardless of their race or gender.

I often think some people will disposition their things differently than I would, but as long as they don't shit on other peoples property, I figure it's none of my business, to be a prohibitionist, like you.
 
Kasich has one single purpose. GOP marching orders are for him to deny Trump Ohio.
Other than that, he's just a tool with no realistic chance for nomination
 
If he loses Ohio, it's game over Johnny

Yep. What's a shame is we the American people will not choose someone with integrity, leadership, & people skills. We have resigned ourselves to choosing leaders who are charismatic, are "kewl", and good at conning the people witness Obama who is nothing more than an egomaniac that acts out like a high school kid.

It will take a gladiator like Trump or Cruz to kick Billary's ass.....unless the FBI gets to her first and then it's her subservient jew boy in play who is no match for any of the Republican candidates.

I like Kasich for his leadership skills and vision but like I said, he's too nice to be elected.
 
Yep. What's a shame is we the American people will not choose someone with integrity, leadership, & people skills. We have resigned ourselves to choosing leaders who are charismatic, are "kewl", and good at conning the people witness Obama who is nothing more than an egomaniac that acts out like a high school kid.

It will take a gladiator like Trump or Cruz to kick Billary's ass.....unless the FBI gets to her first and then it's her subservient jew boy in play who is no match for any of the Republican candidates.

I like Kasich for his leadership skills and vision but like I said, he's too nice to be elected.
Kasich is too far to the left on immigration. I see him as the guy who could most likely make amnesty happen. I wouldn't ever vote for him.

Cruz would make a great president, but I see electability as an issue with him. He won't be able to win in northern states and bring over independents/ blue collar Democrats. His plan is to motivate the 5 million or so conservatives who never showed up to vote for Romney. He's a great guy, but it's not enough.

Trump can beat Hillary, plus we still have Ted in the senate. 2 is better than 1, that's how I see it. bongsmilie
 
Yep. What's a shame is we the American people will not choose someone with integrity, leadership, & people skills. We have resigned ourselves to choosing leaders who are charismatic, are "kewl", and good at conning the people witness Obama who is nothing more than an egomaniac that acts out like a high school kid.

It will take a gladiator like Trump or Cruz to kick Billary's ass.....unless the FBI gets to her first and then it's her subservient jew boy in play who is no match for any of the Republican candidates.

I like Kasich for his leadership skills and vision but like I said, he's too nice to be elected.

 
I favor property owners having the final say on how their property and their body is dispositioned regardless of their race or gender.

I often think some people will disposition their things differently than I would, but as long as they don't shit on other peoples property, I figure it's none of my business, to be a prohibitionist, like you.

so you favor a policy of racial segregation then, one which causes demonstrable harm to people. got it.
 
so you favor a policy of racial segregation then, one which causes demonstrable harm to people. got it.


No, I favor people engage on a consensual basis of the individuals involved. Other people, rather than you or I should decide the nature of their relationships.

What causes a demonstrable harm is when one party to an interaction is involuntarily included. Another harm is created when two parties that wish to associate are prevented from doing so. Your government has done both, silly you for licking their boots.

To not be invited back to the birthday party when you were kid probably did hurt your feelings, but hey you shouldn't have crapped on the floor the previous year...nobody likes a weirdo or people that cause demonstrable harm.
 
No, I favor people engage on a consensual basis of the individuals involved. Other people, rather than you or I should decide the nature of their relationships.

What causes a demonstrable harm is when one party to an interaction is involuntarily included. Another harm is created when two parties that wish to associate are prevented from doing so. Your government has done both, silly you for licking their boots.

To not be invited back to the birthday party when you were kid probably did hurt your feelings, but hey you shouldn't have crapped on the floor the previous year...nobody likes a weirdo or people that cause demonstrable harm.

no matter how you sugarcoat it, we know what you want. you want it to be legal for white people to deny service to black people. i have quotes of you stating this.

so let's not play these little games where you pretend not to be a klan member.

now tell me, are you really so deluded that you think this practice of racial segregation was harmless?
 
no matter how you sugarcoat it, we know what you want. you want it to be legal for white people to deny service to black people. i have quotes of you stating this.

so let's not play these little games where you pretend not to be a klan member.

now tell me, are you really so deluded that you think this practice of racial segregation was harmless?



upload_2016-3-11_19-41-50.png
 
why are you too cowardly to own up to your embrace of racial segregation?

and why are you so stupid that you think it was harmless?


I don't embrace forced human relations. You do.

Forcibly making people associate or preventing people that wish to associate from doing so, are things you wrongfully endorse.


You attempt to hold two opposing points of view at once. You cannot use a coercive means and gain a just end as the means is part of the process.

I won't stoop to calling you stupid, because you're not, but you are a Poopy Pants.
 
I don't embrace forced human relations. You do.

Forcibly making people associate or preventing people that wish to associate from doing so, are things you wrongfully endorse.


You attempt to hold two opposing points of view at once. You cannot use a coercive means and gain a just end as the means is part of the process.

I won't stoop to calling you stupid, because you're not, but you are a Poopy Pants.

so when are you going to admit that your policy of racial segregation is harmful?

maybe once you evolve beyond the 2nd grade attempts at insult?
 
Back
Top