mahiluana
Well-Known Member
what percentage of the chip's output was light before it hit something
After experience of Cree following points in particular affect the lumen maintenance:
- the silicone that serves as the lens of the LED lamp
- the LED chip materials
- the manufacturing process
- the phosphor used and the technique by which this material is applied
http://www.burosch.de/technik/804-verschiebung-des-farbspektrums-der-led.html
yes there is an english version
---> ( this would be a good reason to use a watercooled lens like this...
So the problem of light loss starts inside the chip.
But let`s assume 100% light after trespassing the layer of the chip.
If now we use a lense, we have the same issue.
Transmittance of glas or pmma is about 92-93% .
The light loss is not so high inside the transparent lens, but crossing different materials
the light is reflected or broken at a certain degree.
Air ---> pmma, glas = 4% loss // pmma, glas ---> air = 4% loss
The lens also will get hot.
Now i have no instruments to measure blue light transmittance through water and latex,
but my eyes estimate not lower than 85%, because i was sitting in a dark room with the blue Cree Xlamp chip as the only light source.
i measured the heat of CREE Xlamp royal blue XT-E @ 500mA with 3,08 V for ten minutes
and i received 1,3W of heat power. That means ~ 80% heat power
from input If*Vf = 1,54W.
Blue light passes much better through water than red light.
Even if 15-40% of the light energy would be lost in the layers of water and latex and get converted into heat -
wouldn`t explain 80% heat energy in total - as in a coolmac led system you can store ~ 60%
of total input as heat energy if you tap it only from the backside of the chip and let the light stream free to the room.
Able to tap ~60% of the electric. power as heat( only from the bottom of a chip platine means -
there are left ~40% on the front side as light + heat.
I split it up in ~15-20% heat --- and ~20-25% light .
I estimate, that heat resistance through the upper silikon layer is 4 times higher than
heat resistance through the backside aluminium chip platine.
To estimate !!! what percentage of the chip's total output was light before it hit the condom...
i still pretend - it was ~25% than it will lose 15% of the light =(3,75%) which i have to add to my heat output.
As long as i find the converted light back in my heatexchanger - it`s not so bad.
I`m shure the energy efficiency of led light with a watercooled led lens would rise ~10%.
and light heat compliance could reach up to 95% like power heat compliance does since years.