stiffnuts12
Well-Known Member
Is there much of a difference in growth when using a veg led over a full spectrum? What's the advantages of a veg light?
Yes, there is a significant difference.Is there much of a difference in growth when using a veg led over a full spectrum? What's the advantages of a veg light?
Yes, but I'm not sure it's that simple. You may be able to cram more tops in the same space if the plants are more compact.Research by Bugbee states that, in their testing, plant yield was reduced by 0.77% for every % of blue light between 4 and 20%.
In a video by him that i watched, it came across as it doesn't make much difference.Research by Bugbee states that, in their testing, plant yield was reduced by 0.77% for every % of blue light between 4 and 20%.
I can't remember the video he talked about these findings, but this is from their study:In a video by him that i watched, it came across as it doesn't make much difference.
skip to 14 mins
@OP i am currently flowering an Auto in my veg tent (4000k), its only 2 weeks into flower but its looking fine to me
The lowest fraction of blue photons was 4% from HPS, and increased to 9.8, 10.4, 16, and 20% from LEDs. There was a consistent, linear, 12% decrease in yield in each study as the fraction of blue photons increased from 4 to 20%. Dry flower yield ranged from 500 to 750 g m-2. This resulted in a photon conversion efficacy of 0.22 to 0.36 grams dry flower mass yield per mole of photons. Yield was higher at a PPFD of 900 than at 750 μmol m-2 s-1. There was no effect of spectral quality on CBD or THC concentration. CBD and THC were 8% and 0.3% at harvest in trials one and two, and 12% and 0.5% in trial three. The CBD/THC ratio was about 25 to 1 in all treatments and studies. The efficacy of the fixtures ranged from 1.7 (HPS) to 2.5 μmol per joule (white+red LED). Yield under the white+red LED fixture (10.4% blue) was 4.6% lower than the HPS on a per unit area basis, but was 27% higher on a per dollar of electricity basis. These findings suggest that fixture efficacy and initial cost of the fixture are more important for return on investment than spectral distribution at high photon flux
Thanks for posting the details - a 12% drop in yield due to a 16% increase in blue is a drop in yield of 0.75% per 1% increase in blue photons not 0.77%.I can't remember the video he talked about these findings, but this is from their study:
Cannabis lighting: Decreasing blue photon fraction increases yield but efficacy is more important for cost effective production of cannabinoids
LED technology facilitates a range of spectral quality, which can be used to optimize photosynthesis, plant shape and secondary metabolism. We conducted three studies to investigate the effect of blue photon fraction on yield and quality of medical hemp. Conditions were varied among studies to...journals.plos.org
Not a huge difference, but a difference anyhow.
I think the X6 Mini is a great light! I have an X2 veg and an X3 for flower but I would have bought the Mini if it had been on the market when I bought my lights. The uniformity is amazing.Well I have the chilled growcraft 6x600 watt led was thinking about getting the chilled mini for veg just not 100% on it just yet
And nary a blue photon to be found!Have a 5x5 area in my basement I want to veg in. I would like to keep the areas separate. I have the chilled x6 and a hlg 600 rspec in my current room
I hear ya - I started with a Mars SP 3000, then got the X3 flower, I added a little Vipar Spectra XS-1500 to take care of some branches that "fell" out of my tent, and then picked up the X2 when it was on sale this Summer.I like chilled over hlg. Don't get me wrong hlg is good and what I started out with. Nut st this point saving money is nice as well
Yes, but the reduction in yield is due to more compact growth. It may be possible to counter that by having more plants/tops for the same area.A 10% decrease in yield, for example, means I get 20 ounces instead of 22 ounces. A commercial grower won't be too happy with that. Granted, some of the variable costs will drop but a 10% loss in yield means a 10% drop in income.
on the whole the terms "veg spectrum" and "full spectrum" are meaningless buzz words used by led light manufactures to sell lights.Is there much of a difference in growth when using a veg led over a full spectrum? What's the advantages of a veg light?
This is correct. A good spectrum is a good spectrum and will veg and flower faster than a heavy blue spectrum. It is a bit of myth that you need more blue light during veg. The term "full spectrum" is also overused in this industry. A full PAR spectrum should run from at least 400-700nm. An extended PAR spectrum should go beyond 700nm into the Far Red range. Very few LED lights on the market have light below 430nm so they miss out on the Violet end of the spectrum which counters cell expansion (stretch). A small amount of UVA can also induce more root growth for propagation so is desirable for all stages of growth, just like you find in sunlight throughout the year. We don't sell a "veg light" but we do sell a propagation/leafy green light that has a little more blue in it mainly to thicken the epidermis in leafy greens and boost root propagation in clones and seedlings.on the whole the terms "veg spectrum" and "full spectrum" are meaningless buzz words used by led light manufactures to sell lights.
their is no standard manufactures use for what a "veg", "flowering" or "full spectrum" should look like so everyone just makes it up as they go along.
almost all manufactures "veg" lights are at best simply normal white 70/80cri 5000k diodes that they use for their "full spectrum" or "flower" lights without the added 660nm red diodes, at worst they swap the red 660nm monos for more blue 450nm monos (bad idea).
their is more than enough blue in nearly all "flowering" and "full spectrum" led lights for vegging, you will probably notice worse growth under a dedicated "veg" spectrum than "standard", "flowering" or "full spectrum" lights.
I know this is an old post, but I'm new to LEDs and I have a question! I was researching some things and came across this post. Seems like some knowledge In here, so here goes nothing.This is correct. A good spectrum is a good spectrum and will veg and flower faster than a heavy blue spectrum. It is a bit of myth that you need more blue light during veg. The term "full spectrum" is also overused in this industry. A full PAR spectrum should run from at least 400-700nm. An extended PAR spectrum should go beyond 700nm into the Far Red range. Very few LED lights on the market have light below 430nm so they miss out on the Violet end of the spectrum which counters cell expansion (stretch). A small amount of UVA can also induce more root growth for propagation so is desirable for all stages of growth, just like you find in sunlight throughout the year. We don't sell a "veg light" but we do sell a propagation/leafy green light that has a little more blue in it mainly to thicken the epidermis in leafy greens and boost root propagation in clones and seedlings.
you want the correct ppfd for each stage of growth. forget about uv and purple; use the correct potency of light for each stage, if it where me i would veg without the purples and uv and only use it to give that extra umph in weeks 6 7 8 9 of floI know this is an old post, but I'm new to LEDs and I have a question! I was researching some things and came across this post. Seems like some knowledge In here, so here goes nothing.
It seems that nowadays most LEDS are made with a full spectrum of different colored lights, with no ability to switch certain colored leds on and off. Most have a dimmer, but other than that, all the different colors, UV and IR's just stay on, the whole way through the grow. I've only seen a small percentage that offers that type of versatility... Sayhon's SH2000 unit comes to mind, with a UV/IR supplement switch, that cuts them on and off at will. BUT, then again, I'm also not looking at super expensive grow lights!
My particular upgraded China light is 240w; it's basically two 12x12" quantum panels, bolted together with a reflective hood. Together, they are loaded with 360pc of 3500k "sunlight" leds, 200pc of purple leds, and 16pc of UV leds - for a grand total of 576 LEDs across both boards... Each panel has its own driver and has a "bloom booster" switch. The problem is you only get access to the purple and UV leds through the bloom booster, which I was under the assumption only was used during flower.
But since every LED distributor is using them all together now anyways, would I be better just having all 500+ LEDS cranking at once? Or will that not be as effective as the pure sunlight spectrum during veg? I'm so used to MH and HPS, this is all so confusing..... thanks for any input!!!!
(I've attached photos of my grow lights specs and the Sayhon unit i was referring to!)