cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
A straw man argument is the refuge of liars.And Hillary Clinton was under investigation by the FBI back in 2016. Did that automatically make her guilty, or did you vote for her anyway?
A straw man argument is the refuge of liars.And Hillary Clinton was under investigation by the FBI back in 2016. Did that automatically make her guilty, or did you vote for her anyway?
The difference between you and me, is that I listen to all sides and then look into the issue myself, before coming to a conclusion.Accuses someone of confirmation bias… while demonstrating confirmation bias.
Thanks for the entertainment lol
Dude, it's not straw man. I realize that's your go to defense, when you got nothing else however. If your assertion is that someone shouldn't be considered due to an investigation, then that same assertion should swing both directions. However I've seen you state many times in the past, that an investigation is not the same as a conviction.A straw man argument is the refuge of liars.
then why do you keep posting disinformation?The difference between you and me, is that I listen to all sides and then look into the issue myself, before coming to a conclusion.
Your saying it isn’t does not change the fact if it. You mounted a classic argumentum ad hominem.Dude, it's not straw man. I realize that's your go to defense, when you got nothing else however. If your assertion is that someone shouldn't be considered due to an investigation, then that same assertion should swing both directions. However I've seen you state many times in the past, that an investigation is not the same as a conviction.
No I didn't. I simply pointed out your inconsistency on a specifically relevant point. That is not ad hominem. Nice try though.Your saying it isn’t does not change the fact if it. You mounted a classic argumentum ad hominem.
You may be correct on the ad hominem. Even so, inserting Clinton is a plain straw man.No I didn't. I simply pointed out your inconsistency on a specifically relevant point. That is not ad hominem. Nice try though.
That isn't a fact, it's an opinion. What is a fact, is that the pharma industry is one of the biggest lobbyist groups as well as advertisers in the country, and have immense control over the narrative which they want to project. It's a fact that even low level state senators like Richard Pan, who has received over a million dollars from pharma, write laws specifically designed to serve and protect big pharma, including "investigating" doctors who simply go against their narrative.The fact remains that CCCA is a known disinformation mill with antivax deception as their objective.
More straw men.That isn't a fact, it's an opinion. What is a fact, is that the pharma industry is one of the biggest lobbyist groups as well as advertisers in the country, and have immense control over the narrative which they want to project. It's a fact that even low level state senators like Richard Pan, who has received over a million dollars from pharma, write laws specifically designed to serve and protect big pharma, including "investigating" doctors who simply go against their narrative.
Sure, you always run away when you are stumped in debate. It's ok, I have dishes to wash before I take a shower and get moving for my day. Maybe I'll drink coffee today. It's the first day of school, and I have a horticulture class this afternoon.More straw men.
Your value as an amusement is reduced when you display drag-limited dishonesty mode. I will say good day, sir, and go on to more fruitful wastes of my time.
“Runs away while declaring other people are running”. This you?Sure, you always run away when you are stumped in debate. It's ok, I have dishes to wash before I take a shower and get moving for my day. Maybe I'll drink coffee today. It's the first day of school, and I have a horticulture class this afternoon.
From who, you? Hardly.“Runs away while declaring other people are running”. This you?
I interact with you because your reactions amuse me. You're a source of entertainment.From who, you? Hardly.
I don't generally interact with you, because you're boring. In fact I don't remember interacting with you in the past, that's how boring it is.I interact with you because your reactions amuse me. You're a source of entertainment.
“No u”. hahahaI don't generally interact with you, because you're boring. In fact I don't remember interacting with you in the past, that's how boring it is.
You proved my point perfectly. Bye bye boring guy.“No u”. hahaha
If only I could get other conservatives to give up as fast as you.You proved my point perfectly. Bye bye boring guy.