if this is true.. then some1 should be doing a side by side.. 2 tents.. 1 uvb 1 none.. and then show us in lab results.. I don't wana hear oo ya its more potent.. cause u smoked it .. I wana see this on paper.. because big growers and smart people like sam skunkman have done this n noticed nothing different.. and the results ive read about uvb and shit has all been threw growing SEED .. all seeds are going to be different usually anyways.. soooo.. if some1 does this with clones.. and has lab results to back it up.. show it .. kuz I don't think it matters.. ive been growing for a while and genetics an environment are everything!!!
Why don't you run these tests? Instead of coming here whining why no one has done side-by-side grows with lab tests on UVB results..
And speaking of "labs"-- what exactly should they be looking for: altered cannabinoid profiles? overall trichome count? terpene variations? specific cannabis genetics/strains/phenotypes that react better to ultra violet b? or which levels of UVB intensity used? how about exposure times? --And can you refer those interested parties to a lab that is (solely studying the effects of UVB exposure regarding cannabis' enzymatic processes prior to cannabinoid/trich formation??)
--Only place I've heard of such a lab that is remotely touching the subject is in Israel..
"
because big growers and smart people like sam skunkman have done this n noticed nothing different.." --That really doesn't mean squat in academic terms, but hey, feel free to believe in whatever you want
You demand answers? Go do some REAL research on your own, instead of-- "But so & so said UVB doesn't work, so it must be 100% factual.." /facepalm
If only science was that easy~
Everyone has opinions (and are free to share them) but to dismiss UVB as just another pseudo mumbo-jumbo without actually doing any real research yourself, is just absurd. Besides, your input doesn't contribute much in-regards to UVB in general~