USCB Radical feminist porn professor goes nuts

Red1966

Well-Known Member
for whom is adoption easy? certainly not the child, certainly not the parent; certainly not to the state, and certainly not for the adoptive parents. I was specifically referring to a rape scenario abortion. I fail to see a clear logical line between my statements (in which were contained no justification for anything beyond abortion in the case of insemination and fertilization via rape) and permitting the murder of adult children by their mothers, which is really just murder by people who have a familial relation (no differnet than fratricide, patricide, or matricide). As such, the horror these crimes induce does not carry over into the legal code--it is not punished more severely by decree, but rather by the discretion of judge and jury.
Yes, we should pretend that less than 1% of pregnancies constitute the norm.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
The same way you study any kind of film. i'm done trying to catch up on all of this. I apologize for the previous posts and don't know how I can let myself get taken in by some of these threads. you guys hate knowledge production and can't understand that it might help us to study things that some sects of the poulation revile. You have to study pornography if you want to understand why and how some people really like it and others are so vehemently opposed to it. This is also an ironic form of incompetence on your part. Earlier you alleged i was interested in some form of censorship--something about 18 year olds cussing out teachers being assault, (perhaps where you live) but here you don't even recognize that limiting what scholars study is a massive form of censorship. furthermore, schools are legislated differently and only now are we starting to see more formal, criminal charges taking place in the school context. this is wrong and backwards, and actually not how schools function best. but that's just what years of pedagogical research show. on a forum ostensibly for the cultivation of a plant whose effects on the human psyche are expansive, it is surprising how many mental pipsqueaks troll about these fora.
This is the "politics" forum. If you don't like the conversation, quit coming here.
 

greentrip

New Member
Multi-quote function, buddy, it's your friend, use it..




"I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported – which was to say – that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade." -Obama
in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion — even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Not in the sense that they are "more alive" than skin cells. Something is either alive or it isn't, skin cells are equally as alive as a zygote is. Are you denying that fact?
So killing you is no different than killing a zygote? You are no more alive than skin cells. You seem to be supporting my case. Maybe you should just stick to sucking up to buck. You don't do well on your own.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So killing you is no different than killing a zygote? You are no more alive than skin cells. You seem to be supporting my case. Maybe you should just stick to sucking up to buck. You don't do well on your own.
Me thinks Mr. Obtuse Logic has signaled a retreat!
Or perhaps too busy sucking up to buck in some other thread?
i bet you join groups of racists for the civility and just happen to enjoy the lack of dissent that comes with such a carefully chosen group.

:)
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
So killing you is no different than killing a zygote? You are no more alive than skin cells. You seem to be supporting my case. Maybe you should just stick to sucking up to buck. You don't do well on your own.
LOL! Of course killing me would be different than eliminating a zygote before viable fertilization, what kind of retard wouldn't think so?

I am no more alive than skin cells, no. Get an education, Red
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
LOL! Of course killing me would be different than eliminating a zygote before viable fertilization, what kind of retard wouldn't think so?

I am no more alive than skin cells, no. Get an education, Red
I'm uneducated, yet both of us make more than you. Why would one need an education when doing just fine? Maybe you're the one in need of an education.
 

JohnnySocko

Active Member
The whole abortion debate to me highlights the illogical polarization between left and right:

- a persons right to choose how/what/when to do with their own body is a absolute fundamental right
- still when it comes to reproductive rights, men have zero decision in the liability
- many pro-choice-rs refuse to work towards the mutually beneficial goal of reducing abortion as a viable alternative towards family planning

just like I think executions should be, I think people that consider abortion as a viable choice should be shown the whole bloody thing in living color
 

Dr.J20

Well-Known Member
So, you're taking my advice? It's not " 'murica", its RIU!
the purpose of using the colloquialism " 'murica " was to highlight the absurdity of your previous post, in which, instead of responding to me, you said "this is the politics forum, if you don't like the conversation then you can just get out" which is an exact parallel of the argument "if you don't like america, you can just get out!"
This was such an oft repeated clarion call by the extreme right that South Park spoofed it in the episode "i'm a little bit country." I was merely pointing out that you are a moron; i guess i forgot that you do a more than adequate job of that yourself.
 
Top