Trump's Wag the Dog Moment; Syrian chemical attack was a false flag!

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It is generally advised when rider finds his horse is dead that the rider dismount.

Too funny that @ttystikk would quote some nobody's blog to bump this thread when contained in the same blog is a report by the UN commission of inquiry on Syria saying this:

In its fourteenth report to the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, covering the period between March and July this year, the Commission noted that the Syrian air force used sarin in opposition-held Khan Shaykhun on 4 April, killing over 80 people, most of whom were women and children.

I'll just stick by what I pointed out when tty showed his susceptibility to false conspiracy theories in April:

Look at the list of subscribers to this false flag conspiracy theory: Alt right, Alex Jones, Russia, ttystik
To that we can add Iran. Why do I cite Iran? The author, Porter Gareth of the report is friendly to Iran. For example:

In 2014, Porter traveled to Tehran to participate in the "New Horizon" conference alongside 9/11 truthers, holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites.

I will give tty credit. He hasn't denied the holocaust yet. He has compared the holocaust to Palestinian suffering, so there is some movement in that direction. Considering where he goes for information, it's just a matter of time.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
It is generally advised when rider finds his horse is dead that the rider dismount.

Too funny that @ttystikk would quote some nobody's blog to bump this thread when contained in the same blog is a report by the UN commission of inquiry on Syria saying this:

In its fourteenth report to the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, covering the period between March and July this year, the Commission noted that the Syrian air force used sarin in opposition-held Khan Shaykhun on 4 April, killing over 80 people, most of whom were women and children.

I'll just stick by what I pointed out when tty showed his susceptibility to false conspiracy theories in April:


To that we can add Iran. Why do I cite Iran? The author, Porter Gareth of the report is friendly to Iran. For example:

In 2014, Porter traveled to Tehran to participate in the "New Horizon" conference alongside 9/11 truthers, holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites.

I will give tty credit. He hasn't denied the holocaust yet. He has compared the holocaust to Palestinian suffering, so there is some movement in that direction. Considering where he goes for information, it's just a matter of time.
Well he has sought succor with the holocaust deniers on RIU. Give him time. I wonder if he has really looked into the flat earth theory.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
It is generally advised when rider finds his horse is dead that the rider dismount.

Too funny that @ttystikk would quote some nobody's blog to bump this thread when contained in the same blog is a report by the UN commission of inquiry on Syria saying this:

In its fourteenth report to the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, covering the period between March and July this year, the Commission noted that the Syrian air force used sarin in opposition-held Khan Shaykhun on 4 April, killing over 80 people, most of whom were women and children.

I'll just stick by what I pointed out when tty showed his susceptibility to false conspiracy theories in April:


To that we can add Iran. Why do I cite Iran? The author, Porter Gareth of the report is friendly to Iran. For example:

In 2014, Porter traveled to Tehran to participate in the "New Horizon" conference alongside 9/11 truthers, holocaust deniers, and anti-Semites.

I will give tty credit. He hasn't denied the holocaust yet. He has compared the holocaust to Palestinian suffering, so there is some movement in that direction. Considering where he goes for information, it's just a matter of time.
False equivalency. The UN accepted American assertions of Saddam's 'nuclear weapons program' too.

Not exactly a credible source.

And you can't resist trying the Holocaust denier smear. So hate speech too?

And you wonder why you lack credibility.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
My theory then is that you have the intellect of a fourth grader.
You can't defend your positions so all you have are the very insults you decry.

You're an idiot, a hypocrite and a fake news sponge.

No-one likes you or your retarded views, what don't you get about that?

You can't even debate your position without being utterly destroyed every single time, you don't contribute anything.

At least I include facts between the "you're retarded" comments.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You can't defend your positions so all you have are the very insults you decry.

You're an idiot, a hypocrite and a fake news sponge.

No-one likes you or your retarded views, what don't you get about that?

You can't even debate your position without being utterly destroyed every single time, you don't contribute anything.

At least I include facts between the "you're retarded" comments.
I posted my evidence many times. I notice you refute nothing, you just name-call and shit post.
 
Top