UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Compared to the absolute lack of evidence you provide it appears airtight...
surveillance of an unscather zimmerman isn't no evidence.
Compared to the absolute lack of evidence you provide it appears airtight...
With head injuries and a broken nose? He would have had a neck brace, immobilized and sent to the hospital. He wasn't treated because he wasn't hurt.
surveillance of an unscather zimmerman isn't no evidence.
Watch the actual video of the interview not an editorial on the interview.
Allegedly their are "medical records" to prove it.He was treated at the scene and Im sure SFD would testify to the extent of his injuries under oath.
Allegedly their are "medical records" to prove it.He was treated at the scene and Im sure SFD would testify to the extent of his injuries under oath.
A double negative? ::gasp:: You're drunk!![]()
The point is it really doesn't matter. Him being treated does not prove conclusively that he was attacked by Trayvon. We have to go off of what we know: He followed him. He shot and killed him.
That should be enough for people to agree that charges should have been filed. I'm seriously perplexed as to why there is any disagreement whatsoever..
Allegedly there are "medical records" to prove it.He was treated at the scene and Im sure SFD would testify to the extent of his injuries under oath.
shhhh... let's not get too deep into this. We all know the real reason but we're politely stepping around it.
Allegedly there are "medical records" to prove it.He was treated at the scene and Im sure SFD would testify to the extent of his injuries under oath.
He needs to put ' ' around "no evidence."
That threw me for a loop also
if there were any injuries there would've been pictures taken.... a broken nose normally leads to extensive bleeding and bruising around the eyes.... something worth taking a picture of if you are claiming somebody attacked you and you suffered a broken nose... yet there's no picture to keep as evidence to support the story....
hmmm...
And a gun shot to the head is normally fatal but not always.Do you know what coagulation means?
[youtube]zwDvF0NtgdU[/youtube]
And a gun shot to the head is normally fatal but not always.Do you know what coagulation means?
And Im sure they did take pictures.If they didn't I will ask why.But remember theres a murder investigation going on they are not giving out all the facts.