The u.s. defense budget and the "war on drugs"

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
b5150 said:
That they do an for what, so buck can gain 10lbs every post.... And whatever "gods" point is? To dis on you. Even tho, all i was trying to say is how much money is wasted in the U.S. on worthless shit
Click to expand...
If we been as successful at preventing terrorism against US citizens as you described, how can you say the money was wasted? I work for the earth quake prevention office in N Fl. We've never had a earth quake. So they increased our budget because we were so successful.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
If we HAD been as successful at preventing terrorism against US citizens as you described, how can you say the money was wasted? I work for the earth quake prevention office in N Fl. We've never had aN earth quake. So they increased our budget because we were so successful.
Click to expand...
some nobel prize winning grammar there, red.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
bizarrojohnson said:
Yea, i could talk about this war on drugs bullshit all fucking day. But i can't type it, that'll take way too long. But in essence, fuck the war on drugs, fuck reagan, fuck anyone who agrees with the war on drugs and fuck anyone who disagrees with me on this topic. Good day.
Click to expand...
Reagan? I fucking thought it was fucking Nixon who fucking started the fucking war on fucking drugs?

Fuck.
 
Totoe

Totoe

Well-Known Member
Anyone that goes to college knows Wikipedia is not a source for academic writing. This does not discredit the use of Wikipedia on internet forums, where constituent access to scholarly resources such as ebsco, proquest, jstor, etc, probably does not exist, except for a select few. In the world of the interwebs, Wikipedia is every bit as valid as the guardian, daily mail, cnn, fox, msnbc etc., and depending on the choice wiki's vetting process may actually be better.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Totoe said:
Anyone that goes to college knows Wikipedia is not a source for academic writing. This does not discredit the use of Wikipedia on internet forums, where constituent access to scholarly resources such as ebsco, proquest, jstor, etc, probably does not exist, except for a select few. In the world of the interwebs, Wikipedia is every bit as valid as the guardian, daily mail, cnn, fox, msnbc etc., and depending on the choice wiki's vetting process may actually be better.
Click to expand...
At least it isn't under the scummy control of the Murdochs.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Reagan? I fucking thought it was fucking Nixon who fucking started the fucking war on fucking drugs?

Fuck.
Click to expand...
It was Nixon, but the laws go all the way back to the Harrison tax act of 1914. It took a while for the CIA to be started and then moved into position to fund all their operations with "Black pools of Dark money" from illicit drug trade.

Pretty much for every major wrong happening in the USA there is government mixed up in it somewhere.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
It was Nixon, but the laws go all the way back to the Harrison tax act of 1914. It took a while for the CIA to be started and then moved into position to fund all their operations with "Black pools of Dark money" from illicit drug trade.

Pretty much for every major wrong happening in the USA there is government mixed up in it somewhere.
Click to expand...
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions"

Just ask Anakin Skywalker.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top