The Pro Alex Jones Thread.

PVS

Active Member
yes thats the way to correct corrupt governments. consolidate them all and hand them complete and unconditional authority over the world.
must be that hitler youth education resurfacing.
 

TreesOfLife

Well-Known Member
technically: one who theorizes on conspiracies.
my definition in the context of forums: one who devotes their internet time to attempting to convince others that alex jones is right by posting alex jones links and pasting alex jones articles.

well...you asked :p
The majority 90%+ I got myself from google.I'm not attempting to convince others I just simply put out some new articals. I never said Alex Jones was right about everything. Though the majority of the time he links to the source artical or video. Someone else said it in another thread I forget which, but Alex Jones may be leading us the way the Powers That Be want. It just requires an open mind to see through the smoke and mirrors.
 

Dolce Vita

Active Member
yes thats the way to correct corrupt governments. consolidate them all and hand them complete and unconditional authority over the world.
must be that hitler youth education resurfacing.
the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the facts
 

PVS

Active Member
the new world order has learned from their mistake with hitler. there going to get the people to like whats coming their way. then they have no oppisition except for stoners like me. if i cant even convince you about whats going on, then how am i going to stand up and tell the world. the answer is they win and people like me are just the people who really know whats going on but we are mutes cos the gen pop will laugh at us and not look at the facts
by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.
 

PVS

Active Member
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
 

Dolce Vita

Active Member
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
well, yes and no. i say were open minded to the the nwo takeover. and we are closed minded in the sense that we wont go back to the mindset we had before we were open minded. you are the same way in reverse.
 

Microdizzey

Well-Known Member
im just being a smartass.

look the point i'm making is that its hypocritical to view your camp as open-minded and everyone else close-minded.
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
 

Dolce Vita

Active Member
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
i could not agree more, thanks for articulating this :hump:
 

TreesOfLife

Well-Known Member
by declaring yourself right and stating theory as 'fact' you instantly discredit yourself. i see no point in debating something with someone who is convinced that a theory is fact. it exhibits an unwillingness to ponder other possibilities, even if you suspect they are wrong. its similar to trying to convince an orthodox religious type of the possibility that there really is no god.
Then debate any of the articals posted please. Otherwise make an attack thread if you must attack each other.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
ok, convince me that im wrong. minds wide open!
You were wrong about the article on the Pope. He merely made the suggestion that there be more global oversight on the economy. He DID NOT call for a united world order. He DID NOT. But you made it sound like he authenticated the existence of a new world order. You do take links and blow them out of proportion. Then you tell us we're all wrong and you ask us to go away, claiming that you're the ONLY one who knows the truth. Do you understand how this makes you look? Take a step back and imagine from our point of view....

Here's how you sound. "Alright guys, this is a thread on Alex Jones. We're going to praise Alex Jones because he's right about everything. We're going to paste hundreds of links to videos and make unbelievable claims without any proof. I am right about everything. Do not challenge my opinion."

Sound absurd? Because it is.
 

jrh72582

Well-Known Member
This is true. All sides must be understood. I am always open to being proven wrong, but most of the time people who disagree just name call or say irrelevant things. No examples are provided. That's what dolce is trying to say I think. If you disagree with someones theory, you should provide reason to why you disagree. It makes for good intellectual conversation.

Everything is theory. Science is theory. ;-)
I don't have to provide proof for some of the criticisms I've been making. Dolce said that he wanted an 80% reduction in the population. I said that's a crazy idea. I then asked he would implement it - how he would control people's bodies by prohibiting them from reproducing. And I got told to leave.

So how can I provide evidence when I'm merely asking him to REFINE his argument so that it makes sense. I can't even understand most of what you guys say it's so far out there. So I need you to REFINE your argument. When you constantly refuse to do so, it makes you look like you can't refine it. Thus, there is not argument. There's only Youtube video after Youtube video after Youtube video..............

So tell me - what makes you think Obama is creating robots to destroy anyone who disagrees with him?

How can you feasibly implement a population reduction without taking away people's freedom?

Let's hear it.
 
Top