---soil vs hydro battle---

I think this may has been the topic of many treads but I was recently at a grow shop earlyer and the 2 owners told me that there was no significant diffrence?? I though that Hydro was the best in terms of quantity and quality...but that was just from word of mouth.

Iv been growing outdoors for 5 years and im taking it inside this time... I know hydro takes a little more care and presence (monitiring ph, ppm and so on...) but does growing hydroponicly really make that big of a diffrence?

personally from what I know, it does have an effieciency in production by 10-15% under optimum conditions and proper monitoring, but like most it has cost obviously apart from the running cost, which is its less forgiving then soil....
just my opinion mate, but soil keeps an eye as thats the way nature intended unless its an aquatic plant.

You can get RAPID and KILLER results from either... It really depends on personal preference. From what little experience I have dealing with other growers, it really boils down to which one your personality-type blends better with, and which one you have more of a knack for.

I am not saying you cannot be an expert in both, but as far as real results you can expect, it really depends on your personal aptitudes and preferences.

Hydros faster and cleaner and i change rez every 2wks easy just top off rez and adjust nutes in between changes.
Fuck ups happen faster too.
I'll bullshit with yall later Woodstock just started on the tube & i gotta load my pipe.