just watched some.
I disliked the part where he recommended the Ukrainians negotiate with a despot.
While I am sympathetic to an antiwar stance, not differentiating between Putin and Biden is the sort of bullshit that can accompany an all-sides approach to war. By that criterion, the French Resistance were war criminals.
This is how a simplistic humanitarian impulse can turn, or be turned, into effective pro-fascist propaganda. I don’t think it was intentional, but filtered through his blinders of sentiment. That guy is worldly enough to know better, so shame on him.
I disagreed with the part where he recommended the Ukrainians negotiate too. I think he starts with the same mistake we all make at times, which is to believe that everybody is like ourselves. From that perspective, Putin can be negotiated with. From that perspective we can look at how NATO did in fact push to Russia's borders and discuss how maybe we shouldn't have threatened Russia into making a preemptive strike against a Ukraine that was going that way.
So, you are right Waters is following simplistic humanitarian beliefs to place the people of Ukraine in what I see would be the lions den. I see Waters as playing the classic role of useful idiot. But that's different from what Trump and right wing authoritarian followers are doing with the subject. That's different from what Putin is doing with his propaganda machine. They are using it as a wedge to peel off support from Democrats or inside NATO. Or they tried that tactic and it blew up on them. Putin has unified NATO and helped heal the harm Trump did to it.
I can listen to Waters and not be bothered by it. I wish we could have discourse like that again. That kind of discussion is healthy.
When he applied the rationale to Pearl Harbor (with not one word about what Japan did), the necessary corollary is that he is not ok with us providing the impetus to break Hitler’s Germany. I furthermore reject his thesis that the Russians had already won. Without our nibbling at the edges in ‘42 and ‘43, Stalingrad, which was a damn close thing, would have pivoted the other way.
So instead if nine million dead in the camps, try nine hundred million. He would not have stopped until he had all of Eurasia and Africa under the yoke of the swastika, minus China and Indochina that go to Japan.
Never forget that he considered Slavs, as white as western Europeans, as inferior and to be removed.
I didn't hear what he said about Pearl Harbor as a condemnation of the US for entering into war. He made the point that the US was isolationist before Pearl Harbor. We didn't come into the war as liberators, we were pushed into it by that attack. I also didn't hear him condemning the US for fighting in that war, he claimed Russia won it before the US even got started.
I'm not defending what he said, I'm just saying I'm OK with somebody being passionately wrong. So long as they don't argue using fake bullshit ginned up by propagandists or otherwise. Waters kind of protest is not a threat to our society.