Ruling class

ilkhan · Oct 25, 2009

This is Class warfare Bull-Shit.
You think if you have a million bucks you mean shit to these people?
You think because you own a buisness your in the Elite?
Please, the elite deal in trillions of worthless paper tickets you call dollars.
We've handed the bankers cartel power in the form of the FED.
And we are all fighting over who has a seadoo in his garage,
Or a vacation home on the lake.

You think a guy who went though medical school and makes 300k a year is your enemy?
Think Again.

Johnnyorganic · Oct 25, 2009

PVS said:
ok so you're just going to take the cowardly route and not address your little lie? you could have simply admitted error in judgement in posting it...but thats ok. go on posting your 'lol's and smilies. that will make you correct.

i addressed your accusation once as i shall again: the generally accepted elite/ruling/controlling/economical-ass-rapers-of-common-folk-like-you-and-i/etc are those making far beyond 250,000 household income. unless you feel that the difference between a 250,000 and 250,000,000 income is nothing to sneeze at. a doctor/lawyer married couple can easlily make 250,000 a year. an elite banking executive can easily make 250,000 as a monthly bonus...and feel cheated.

and here's the kicker: i never said that it wasn't an issue of income. i said "national median income". totally different things, which should be obvious to anyone with a rudimentary grasp of the english language. but you keep pushing your lies, misquotes, and distorting libel. whatever helps you win that internet!

You split hairs between the term income and national median income in some insipid attempt to accuse me of lying. You're awesome!

Can you explain to all of us what the definition if 'is' is, too? :-P

None of which takes anything away from my original point highlighted in the article I linked. The Democratic Party, protector of the oppressed and downtrodden, is also the party of the rich and powerful - Elites.

You thought I forgot about that didn't you?

We're done here. I made a point you cannot refute. Your only responses are attempts at deflection and stupid little attempted assaults on my character.

Nice try, Pee Wee. :clap:

Later....

RickWhite · Oct 25, 2009

PVS said:
technically 'elite' is a subjective term, but its most commonly used to describe the top 1% of household incomes. that would be multi-millionares and billionares:

from 2005 census:
$100,000 or more (15.73%)
$100,000 to $149,999 9.89%
$150,000 to $199,999 3.17%
$200,000 to $249,999 1.17%
$250,000 and above 1.50%

anyway, read your own "evidence" before trying to insult the intelligence of about 50% of americans.

"Democrats now represent 57 percent of the 4.8 million households that had incomes of $200,000 or more in 2008.
In 2005, Republicans represented 55 percent of those affluent households."

that simply means that roughly 10% of households of $200,000 or more have been swing voters from 2005-2008. how does this make democrats 'elitists'?

figures don't lie but liars figure

$250K isn't that much money. Sure it's a damn nice living but it's a far cry from being stinking rich. I think multi millionaires would be more along the lines of .001% and billionaires would be .00001%

But if 16% of Americans make over $100K that means that there are a whole lot of very prosperous people here. Sounds like Capitalism is doing good by a whole lot of people. Kind of hard to claim that the man is keeping you down with so many high wage earners.

PVS · Oct 25, 2009

Johnnyorganic said:
You split hairs between the term income and national median income in some insipid attempt to accuse me of lying. You're awesome!

more lies. i said simply:

PVS said:
"elite" does not mean "higher than the national median income".

nothing more. so keep distorting and lying.

Johnnyorganic said:
Can you explain to all of us what the definition if 'is' is, too?

derp

Johnnyorganic said:
None of which takes anything away from my original point highlighted in the article I linked. The Democratic Party, protector of the oppressed and downtrodden, is also the party of the rich and powerful - Elites.

i quoted a passage from your own article that proves you factually incorrect. you ignored it. 3 times. very mature. lets try again for those not keeping up (you):

PVS said:
"Democrats now represent 57 percent of the 4.8 million households that had incomes of $200,000 or more in 2008.
In 2005, Republicans represented 55 percent of those affluent households."

that simply means that roughly 10% of households of $200,000 or more have been swing voters from 2005-2008. how does this make democrats 'elitists'?

still you won't address it. rather you have employed babyish distractive tactics. people like you just stick your fingers in your ears and yell "la la la la la" until your opponents get bored and quit, so you can claim the win. what a weak way to be dude.

Johnnyorganic said:
You thought I forgot about that didn't you?

what the hell are you on about here? forget that you intentionally avoided the point? i have not dodged a single one of yours.

Johnnyorganic said:
We're done here. I made a point you cannot refute. Your only responses are attempts at deflection and stupid little attempted assaults on my character.

Nice try, Pee Wee.

Later....

derp "pee wee" how witty and clever. winnar!

NoDrama · Oct 25, 2009

You can have a 401K that says you have $2 million in it and it is actually worth NOTHING. Until you take that money out and turn it into an asset or a hard currency it is nothing but a symbol on a piece of paper. The true Elite know this and they already have so many assets that money is no longer the object, power and control are the object. Astor, Bundy, Collins, Dupont, Freeman, Kennedy, Li, Onassis, Reynolds, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Russel, and Van Duyn are what I consider "Elite". Most of the rest are just rich bastards and have no say in day to day society.

PVS · Oct 25, 2009

RickWhite said:
$250K isn't that much money. Sure it's a damn nice living but it's a far cry from being stinking rich.

well....yes...basically
i notice that you agree with me a lot while being sure that you are in total disagreement with me

RickWhite said:
I think multi millionaires would be more along the lines of .001% and billionaires would be .00001%

i think there are actually a lot more millionares in the u.s. than you speculate, but you're on the same track of thought that i am. such a miniscule percentage of the population holding such a vast majority of wealth and power.

RickWhite said:
But if 16% of Americans make over $100K that means that there are a whole lot of very prosperous people here.

keep in mind however that with the dollar getting weaker so does the impressiveness of a 100k/year income.

PVS · Oct 25, 2009

haha johnnyorganic, keeps negative rep'ing me.

remember kids: if you can't debate a position without lying and distorting, find vindication by abusing a superficial forum rating system

well played :roll:

libs r scared! · Oct 25, 2009

RickWhite said:
Boohoohoo. Maybe if you spent as much time trying to get ahead as you spend whining like a little bitch you might actually make something of yourself.

I for one hope there is a ruling class, it gives me a goal to shoot for.

"Losers whine about doing their best, winners go home and fuck the prom queen." Sean Connery.

ditto!
im the human resorce manager at Home Depot n u wouldnt beleive how many lib pukes ive had to shitcan for bein crybabies who think they should get paid to show up 5 minutes late then sit around all day.

Ruling class

ilkhan

Well-Known Member

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member

RickWhite

Well-Known Member

PVS

Active Member

NoDrama

Well-Known Member

PVS

Active Member

PVS

Active Member

libs r scared!

New Member