The tack in Montana is for the Republican supermajority to attack the judiciary. Since the judiciary upholds current law, and the reactionary legislature doesn't like law when it doesn't favor them, they are working on the underpinnings.Culture warriors in Montana get slammed by district judge — and are left holding the bill for their shenanigans!
Birth certificate rule is unconstitutional, judge holds state in contempt, liable for entire suit • Daily Montanan
Judge Michael Moses declares Senate Bill 280 unconstitutional and holds the State of Montana in contempt for not following the orders of the court and the state's Supreme Court.dailymontanan.com
"If democracy gets in the way of what Montana's GOP legislators want to do, then democracy in Montana has to go. "The tack in Montana is for the Republican supermajority to attack the judiciary. Since the judiciary upholds current law, and the reactionary legislature doesn't like law when it doesn't favor them, they are working on the underpinnings.
Bill that would change how Montana supreme court justices are elected is lacking needed support
House Bill 915 would make it so the governor appoints Montana supreme court justices for eight-year terms with prospective appointees needing approval from the Senate.www.ktvq.com
I looked for an article on the impetus for this legislation (you, I and the chickens know dominionists are at the root of this) but the new destructive reformatting of Google for iPhone frustrated the search.The tack in Montana is for the Republican supermajority to attack the judiciary. Since the judiciary upholds current law, and the reactionary legislature doesn't like law when it doesn't favor them, they are working on the underpinnings.
Bill that would change how Montana supreme court justices are elected is lacking needed support
House Bill 915 would make it so the governor appoints Montana supreme court justices for eight-year terms with prospective appointees needing approval from the Senate.www.ktvq.com
It's really about power. It's been a running dispute for a while. I am not sure what really started it, but I think it was a GOP plan from the beginning to attack abortion rights. So, yes, dominionists.I looked for an article on the impetus for this legislation (you, I and the chickens know dominionists are at the root of this) but the new destructive reformatting of Google for iPhone frustrated the search.