Ontario’s Liberal government has missed an opportunity to create a competitive recreational marijuana market with its plans to restrict sales to provincially run stores, according to a new analysis from a think-tank.
The analysis by the C.D. Howe Institute, to be released Wednesday, faults the province for its refusal to allow the private sector involvement in pot retailing.
“More competition between businesses would constrain operating costs and keep prices low,” the institute says in its report. “Lower prices in the legal market would make it more likely to be competitive with the existing black market.”
The report also faults the province for its plans — once the federal government actually legalizes recreational cannabis likely this summer — to severely restrict the number of outlets that will sell pot. The province has said 40 stores will be in place initially, with 150 by 2020.
The result, the institute says, will be inconvenient access for many people leading them to stay with the black market.
“Recreational consumers are highly unlikely to switch their dollars to the regulated market if there isn’t easy access,” the report states. “This means that there will be significant opportunity for the black market to continue operating in all the areas without enough legal stores to meet market demand or that are convenient to access.”
The report notes that Alberta, for example, is making privately run stores responsible for marijuana retailing although even a mixed model of licensed establishments operating alongside government retail stores could deliver better market coverage faster than the province could on its own.
Additionally, the study proposes changing the way alcohol is taxed to applying taxes to the level of alcohol content rather than on volume.
Overall, the report by Benjamin Dachis — called Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario — argues that the province is on an “unsustainable” fiscal course.
It takes aim at government spending that is out of line with its ability to raise revenues, saying the government should adopt a long-term fiscal policy that requires surpluses, not just balanced budgets.
Among its various ideas, the study argues for keeping health-care costs under control by limiting payments to family doctors, making free drug programs for those under 24 and seniors income-tested rather than universal, and slowing increases in the minimum wage.
The general minimum wage in Ontario jumped to $14 an hour this year from $11.60, and is set to rise to $15 per hour on Jan. 1, 2019. Some have argued the increase will hurt small businesses and lead to job losses.
The study also calls for scrapping rent controls and transfer taxes as a way to curb dramatic increases in housing costs.
“The government’s policies have focused mostly on curtailing the demand of housing,” the report states. “In contrast, the actions so far for boosting housing supply have been largely limited to minor rebates on some types of development charges and taxes for multi-residential units.”
Ontario voters are expected to go to the polls June
Mark says:
March 20, 2018 at 9:32 pm
Legalization does not mean to let people profit. Profit means more consumption, marketing and the goal is not HUMAN HEALTH but getting rich using other people’s vulnerabilities.
Normalize it? Really? Increase sales till what?
Capitalism would say 100% of adults should partake every day. That’s the optimal goal for the for profit sector.
Never ENOUGH money. After harm, apologize, lie that you did not know and wait it out.
Why does anyone NEEF storefront.
Adults should have a home address and if I am not mistaken AMAZON is doing just fine with mail order.
But no, greedy humans wanting a Porsche on some collective groups expense.
This is not inventing a tool that saves or improves lives .
An intoxicant. Why would we want the free market involved? So workers get paid crap so Fantino et all make millions.
So the little store guy gets a doctor’s wage while paying his staff f all
The analysis by the C.D. Howe Institute, to be released Wednesday, faults the province for its refusal to allow the private sector involvement in pot retailing.
“More competition between businesses would constrain operating costs and keep prices low,” the institute says in its report. “Lower prices in the legal market would make it more likely to be competitive with the existing black market.”
The report also faults the province for its plans — once the federal government actually legalizes recreational cannabis likely this summer — to severely restrict the number of outlets that will sell pot. The province has said 40 stores will be in place initially, with 150 by 2020.
The result, the institute says, will be inconvenient access for many people leading them to stay with the black market.
“Recreational consumers are highly unlikely to switch their dollars to the regulated market if there isn’t easy access,” the report states. “This means that there will be significant opportunity for the black market to continue operating in all the areas without enough legal stores to meet market demand or that are convenient to access.”
The report notes that Alberta, for example, is making privately run stores responsible for marijuana retailing although even a mixed model of licensed establishments operating alongside government retail stores could deliver better market coverage faster than the province could on its own.
Additionally, the study proposes changing the way alcohol is taxed to applying taxes to the level of alcohol content rather than on volume.
Overall, the report by Benjamin Dachis — called Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario — argues that the province is on an “unsustainable” fiscal course.
It takes aim at government spending that is out of line with its ability to raise revenues, saying the government should adopt a long-term fiscal policy that requires surpluses, not just balanced budgets.
Among its various ideas, the study argues for keeping health-care costs under control by limiting payments to family doctors, making free drug programs for those under 24 and seniors income-tested rather than universal, and slowing increases in the minimum wage.
The general minimum wage in Ontario jumped to $14 an hour this year from $11.60, and is set to rise to $15 per hour on Jan. 1, 2019. Some have argued the increase will hurt small businesses and lead to job losses.
The study also calls for scrapping rent controls and transfer taxes as a way to curb dramatic increases in housing costs.
“The government’s policies have focused mostly on curtailing the demand of housing,” the report states. “In contrast, the actions so far for boosting housing supply have been largely limited to minor rebates on some types of development charges and taxes for multi-residential units.”
Ontario voters are expected to go to the polls June
March 20, 2018 at 9:32 pm
Legalization does not mean to let people profit. Profit means more consumption, marketing and the goal is not HUMAN HEALTH but getting rich using other people’s vulnerabilities.
Normalize it? Really? Increase sales till what?
Capitalism would say 100% of adults should partake every day. That’s the optimal goal for the for profit sector.
Never ENOUGH money. After harm, apologize, lie that you did not know and wait it out.
Why does anyone NEEF storefront.
Adults should have a home address and if I am not mistaken AMAZON is doing just fine with mail order.
But no, greedy humans wanting a Porsche on some collective groups expense.
This is not inventing a tool that saves or improves lives .
An intoxicant. Why would we want the free market involved? So workers get paid crap so Fantino et all make millions.
So the little store guy gets a doctor’s wage while paying his staff f all
