rep if you used a veg spec bulb in flowering what would happen? rep

Fditty00

Well-Known Member
The plant would grow a happy life! People use hps to vegg all the time. They might not be as big, but they would do just fine. For cheap fix, add a few daylight cfls to help. Good luck, smoke well..
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
If a shift to red spectrum aids growth and development, then doesn't it stand to reason what failing to make that shiftwould do?
 

Straight up G

New Member
The plant would grow a happy life! People use hps to vegg all the time. They might not be as big, but they would do just fine. For cheap fix, add a few daylight cfls to help. Good luck, smoke well..

lol you are confused I would use a HPS to veg but what I meant was I have a veg spec bulb but should be using a flower spec..

Your bud would not grow to their full potential. Yes, you will have buds, just smaller fluffier buds. That's all.
rep'd

If a shift to red spectrum aids growth and development, then doesn't it stand to reason what failing to make that shiftwould do?
It does, but not to what degree..
 

Straight up G

New Member
thanks all I am going to get a flower spec bulb but the reg won't change as they are autoflowering, what do you do just swap them in the dark period??
 

Fditty00

Well-Known Member
Vice versa, mh to flower. Itll b fine. I seen a episode of urban grower, that had a dude using a mh for a huge medi-grow. His shit looked awesome. Good luck..
 

thelastpirate

Well-Known Member
I have both vegged and flowered under them both. I even did a grow where one side of the room got MH the other HPS, with the 2 combined in a "mixed spectrum" in the middle.
I found NO DISCERNIBLE DIFFERENCE between the 2. Veg with HPS or flower with MH. I promise you that if you do YOUR job right, any differences in yield will be negligible, if you even notice a difference at all. MH buds might be a BIT less dense in some strains.
I veg and flower under 1K HPS bulbs and am getting right at, or more than, the proverbial GPW.

day 43.jpg

Room @ dayt 43.jpg

trichs.jpg

DSC00713.jpg

Vice versa, mh to flower. Itll b fine. I seen a episode of urban grower, that had a dude using a mh for a huge medi-grow. His shit looked awesome. Good luck..
 

tyke1973

Well-Known Member
You would still get a crop but the size of the overhall yeild would be effected unless it was a h.p.s or h.i.d both will give you good results with flowering.I use a h.p.s light for all my growing be it vegging or flowering and i would have to say that a h.p.s is the best overhall light on the market for everthing to do with growing.But if you are going to use something like a flouresent then i would change the spec coulour to more of a flowering coulour.But to be honest if i had to go back to the old days of useing floresents then i would stop growing the yeild that you will get do not make it worth the rist that you are takeing........................tyke...............................................................
 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member
i have my orange bud flowering under cmh right now until i have room in the flower room, back in the day i read that indoor growing was done with mh before they started to use hps
 

Straight up G

New Member
y does everyone think this is about different lamps the op is about veg/flower spectrums not recommended types of lamp for veg/flower..
 

Jerry Garcia

Well-Known Member
I like to alternate between mh and hps for flower. I just switch out my bulb every other week or so. Though I like to use MH for the first couple weeks of flower, as I've read this will limit the "stretch." I think that's a bunch of bull, as they stretch no matter which light I use, but I still do it.
 

Hobbes

Well-Known Member
.

MH will give you tighter buds, smaller but the overall weight will be similiar.

Potency will be similiar.

The blue spectrum will slow transition into flower.

Flowering under MH will take about a week longer than HPS.

The plants will take longer to switch into flower and will stretch more - though other people claim their plants stay shorter in flower under MH.

I used MH for 2 years (Hortilux) and prefer HPS. I have a perpetual grow or I would try HPS for the first two weeks of flower, MH in the middle and HPS for the final two or three weeks. There's an "Ideal Kelvin" chart, for each week of flower, but I can't find it. I'll post it here if I come across it.



.

bongsmilie
 

Straight up G

New Member
same thing:dunce:
we are discussing the spectrum regaurdless of what lamp you use

I am using a HPS I do not want advice on what lamp you use I have asked what effect a veg spec bulb will have on my flowering plants MH or any other type of lamp is totally irrelivant in this thread

if you cannot diffrentiate between what I am asking and what you are saying we will never be on the same page..

[all] read the op then the thread
 
I

Illegal Smile

Guest
Not surprisingly, plant scientists or even advanced growers have not run experiments to learn exactly how much doing the wrong thing would hurt the grow. So the question "how much will it hurt if I do this or that thing wrong" has to remain unanswered - except to say "try it and let us know."
 

Straight up G

New Member
I do understand what you are saying rob but this is about different bulbs not lamps

I am not saying for a second that you are wrong and I am right just misunderstood, you know a lot more about growing than me
 

Hobbes

Well-Known Member
.

SUG I hope you don't mind me posting these here, they go into changing light spectrum/kelvin during stages of life.

BOG (Bushy Old Grower) said that he lowered his light levels towards the end of flower to increase potency, I'm not sure if it was by producing more trichomes or more cannaboids in the existing trichomes.

I'm a believer in high K at the end of flower for resin/cannaboid production but I run a perpetual grow which makes it more difficult. I'm looking for low wattage, high lumen spot lighting in the UVB range but very little exists with more than 10% UVB with the range we need for a spot light.



.
 
Top