Rawn Pawl is not a libertarian. He is a fascist vanguard.

Dr Kynes said:
deflecting back to what you perceive as inadequacy in other ideas does not answer the funadamental question "What exaclty is the "Libertarian Socialist" theory and how do you propose it would operate?"

a question which thus far has not been answered, not even by chomsky, save to reassure us that it is not in fact an oxymoron. and we can take that to the bank...
Click to expand...

Actually, anarcho-capitalism is the oxymoron since hierarchy is inherent to capitalism. But to ruffle your breeches a little more, no, NO NO, the fundamental question is not in any way related Chomsky, nor is it to explain libertarian socialism. The fundamental question is, why the fuck are capitalists calling them selves libertarians, when they are in fact quite statist?
 
abandonconflict said:
Actually, anarcho-capitalism is the oxymoron since hierarchy is inherent to capitalism. But to ruffle your breeches a little more, no, NO NO, the fundamental question is not in any way related Chomsky, nor is it to explain libertarian socialism. The fundamental question is, why the fuck are capitalists calling them selves libertarians, when they are in fact quite statist?
Click to expand...

since only you and chomsky use that tired pharase "anarcho-capitalism" it cannot be called an oxymoron, it is better described as "A Strawman constructed by you and chomsky to discredit capitalism"

capitalism has a longstanding method of action, well established motivations, and a solid backstory.

Your "Libertarian Socilaism" is the perplexingly complex, and apparently purposeless Rube Goldberg Device that requires explanation.

yet despite many requests for clarification, none has been forthcoming.

capitalists can in fact be libertarians, since capitalism and liberty are not mutually exclusive.

if you can pull yourself away from your tireless work at the local Build-A-Bear, where you put in a full days work constructing shabby strawmen, perhaps you could explain (finally) the motivation, method and logic that governs "Libertarian Socialism"
 
Dr Kynes said:
since only you and chomsky use that tired pharase "anarcho-capitalism" it cannot be called an oxymoron, it is better described as "A Strawman constructed by you and chomsky to discredit capitalism"
Click to expand...

mqdefault.jpg

Buy gold
fluoride in the water
illuminati runs the fed
Jim Crow laws


Stop trying to deflect. If you want to understand the philosophy I agree with, go read about it. There is no shortage of literature on the subject. Start with Orwell.
 
abandonconflict said:
mqdefault.jpg

Buy gold
fluoride in the water
illuminati runs the fed
Jim Crow laws


Stop trying to deflect. If you want to understand the philosophy I agree with, go read about it. There is no shortage of literature on the subject. Start with Orwell.
Click to expand...

im not deflecting. i DID search the motherfucking shit out of that phrase, and came up with chomsky running his whore mouth, and a shitload of weak ass geocities sites. the concensus being, "Dude, "Libertarian Socialism" is the bestest philosophy EVAR!! and it's like totally not an oxymoron!"

george orwell never used the phrase "Libertarian Socilaism", nor did he ever espouse any of the views you claim to hold so dear.
all the shit you have actually claimed (when you actually make a definitive statement) is more in line with the Communist Manifesto than any of orwell's views, unless your confessing that in fact your views were the subject of the novel Animal Farm, or youre secretly part of the Pro-Big Brother faction who thinks 1984 was a transcendent vision of the future which could be...


your "go look it up yourself" jibber-jabber must therefore be construed as a complete lack of knowledge on the subject, or deliberate obfuscation.
 
By the way, Rothbard (founder of "American Libertarianism") coined the term anarcho-capitalism.

Did I mention that "American Libertarianism" was Rothbard's idea?

I find it tiring that you are still trying to keep up with me in debate when you have not educated yourself on political philosophy enough to know about the philosophy I agree with (when I'm vigorously avoiding pushing it anyway) yet I have taken the time to educate myself on that which I attack. That is why you have only to decry my ad hominem attacks on the stupid people and launch nothing but distortions in your arguments. You're better off talking about how socialists want you to share your toothbrush and underwear. At least then you can count on morons agreeing with you while I resort to ad hominem. I hate idiots.
 
Dr Kynes said:
im not deflecting. your "go look it up yourself" jibber-jabber must therefore be construed as a complete lack of knowledge on the subject, or deliberate obfuscation.
Click to expand...

Look at the title of this thread. Yet again Dr Keynes goes several pages in a thread in an attempt to thread jack. That is how I know you've lost.
 
abandonconflict said:
By the way, Rothbard (founder of "American Libertarianism") coined the term anarcho-capitalism.

Did I mention that "American Libertarianism" was Rothbard's idea?

I find it tiring that you are still trying to keep up with me in debate when you have not educated yourself on political philosophy enough to know about the philosophy I agree with (when I'm vigorously avoiding pushing it anyway) yet I have taken the time to educate myself on that which I attack. That is why you have only to decry my ad hominem attacks on the stupid people and launch nothing but distortions in your arguments. You're better off talking about how socialists want you to share your toothbrush and underwear. At least then you can count on morons agreeing with you while I resort to ad hominem. I hate idiots.
Click to expand...

yep. still at heart just a contemptuous little worm who believes his blind faith in some ridiculous rebranding of marxism makes him special.

sling your silly ad hominems all you like, youre still just pissing your own huggies and crying for noam chomsky's titty.
 
abandonconflict said:
Look at the title of this thread. Yet again Dr Keynes goes several pages in a thread in an attempt to thread jack. That is how I know you've lost.
Click to expand...

this thread is about what political philosophy ron paul subscribes to.

failing to describe a political ideology, and falsely labeling others does not alter ron paul's stance, but it sure proves you are a douche and a liar.

ron paul is a libertarian, You Are Not.

ron paul has a political philosophy which is well established and understandable. You Do Not.

ron paul will explain his views to any who ask, You Will Not

ron paul understands his own views and can articulate them. You Are A Douche.



discuss.
 
abandonconflict said:
Yes, that is correct.
Click to expand...

abandonconflict said:
now is the time to just shut up and praise Obama.
Click to expand...

i can take statements out of context too.

it's easy.

youre just become more and more desperate to escape your own marxism, but you can only do that by lying, and attempting to deflect.

ron paul at least has the strength of character to hold to his beliefs. you hide yours from any examination because you are well aware that you subscribe to the most thinly veiled, least well thought out and most ridiculous re-branding of marxism ever set forth.

"Libertarian Socialism" is just Stalinism with a happy face drawn on the oppressor's boot.
 
abandonconflict said:
When all else fails, brand political opponents "Marxist". It works because I'm not pushing my views.
Click to expand...

you are a marxist, and you push noam chomsky's views, while concealing your own motivations, which makes you a coward, a fool or a follower.

you cant get off chomsky's dick long enough to have an idea of your own, so you parrot his weak new-left marxism, and squawk about how evil everybody except noam choimky is.

yep. youre too afraid to have your own ideas or motivations and chomsky's bullshit and sweaters provide you with the psuedo-intellectual credibility you crave among the first year poli-sci majors, so why not?

those ribbed fisherman's sweaters must provide ample purchase for your grasping fingers when the chomsky dick-ride becomes a little too rough.
 
Please define "Zionist" for me.
I'm an Anarchist, but Chomsky is a fuckhead.
You quote Russell in your signature, if I'm not mistaken he was a supporter of Bolshevism.
 
NietzscheKeen said:
Please define "Zionist" for me.
I'm an Anarchist, but Chomsky is a fuckhead.
You quote Russell in your signature, if I'm not mistaken he was a supporter of Bolshevism.
Click to expand...

Please define fuckhead. You are mistaken, Russel was very critical of the Soviet Republic, but not because of his status in British class.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
NWO Library of Information; (no need for comments - but you can make them)
Replies
13
Views
3K
shnkrmn
shnkrmn
Back
Top