I'm going to put few comments with red color in your essay, Odin:
================================================
Plenty of intelligent people have told you that you cannot identify the heaviest yielder in veg. It is apparent that you have already made up your mind and are only looking for responses that support your incorrect assumption.
I have never even thought about identifying the heaviest yielder in veg. Instead I was thinking about tossing the smallest ones which are ridiculously smaller or less vigorous compared to the rest. For what reason are you bending my words like that, you cunt? Think about the difference of what you just said and what I said. Based on your expression I get a feeling that next people that I'm going to quote from this thread now are very unintelligent:
1) My experince indoors is the most vigirous will produce the most, not the best...
2) High yeilding plants that are slow to veg is not a commercially desired traits over a high yeilding plants that are quick to veg. From a business point of veiw id say your crazy looking for slow growing plants at any stage.
3) If you want the biggest yields then clone the fastest and biggest plants and select from them, if you want the best quality grow 100 plants and select the strongest. Lets not confuse simple practice.
4) For fast turnover you want the fastest vegging plants as they will be turning 12/12 early for a sea of green. That is the best way for business if you don’t care about plant potential. Grow a ton of little plants over and over as fast as possible. Yield per year not per plant.
5) Selecting slow growing plants is redundant, after you have done two grows ive completed three and outyielded your slow growers by a few hundred grams. Biological efficiency is a general rule we can apply, never have i had a small veg plant finish with bigger yeild than a bigger veg plant of the same strain.
6) On many occasions the strongest vegging plants will perform strong in flower. You can use it as a guide yes. But to say it's an absolute evey time would be misleading.
7) If you have a small number of bought seeds, grow and clone every one. If you have a ton of your own F2s or crosses, sprout as many as you can in your available space and then have several rounds of elimination, removing the runts and stragglers as they grow and crowd each other out. Breeder Steve pops thousands of seeds at once and then cherry picks while they are still very small. You can spot leaf shape, internode spacing and vigor very early on.
8 ) What if you have 10,000 seeds? You couldn't possibly grow them all out. You can't spot keepers in seedling stage, but you can remove the plants that exhibit unwanted or less desirable traits early on. Whorled phyllotaxy/triploid for example. If you sprout more seeds than you need, you can remove those, and those show right away. If you only sprout as many as you will flower, you're stuck growing them. It's a numbers game and the more you start with the more choosey you can be and the more likey you will end up with phenos that exhibit traits that you want.
9) This has “stumbled” away from my point that “you cannot properly identify your keeper without blooming it” and towards “but you can identify nasty crooked little midget dicks”. <<<------ this was said by yourself btw)
Well, as stated to the point of painful redundancy, you need to bloom each and every single plant.
Even the nasty crooked little midget dicks. You cannot tell, at all, what that plant will yield without blooming it, nobody fucking knows, the damn thing has never been flowered before.
Even the nasty crooked little midget dick has never been flowered before. A plant may be slow, for whatever reason, in it’s initial run from seed, but grow vigorously from clone, and ever after. This is what I had implied in my anecdotal tales, but they went over your head.
I like the way you express yourself with a help of fancy words that I have to google to find the meaning, but I'm not going to take your input as an absolute truth. Although I feel like there might be few really good thoughts that you have brought out. Thanks.
Now that you’ve been so rude, I’d also like to point out that you will not be successful in your “pheno hunt” due to your piss poor grow skills. Your plants are in sad shape. Not at deaths door, but appear much like the starved Ethiopian children from the charity commercials.
Well, funny thing is that even if you sound like you know stuff and you obviously are more experienced at growing.. and taking into account how you criticize me negatively, I'm still able to produce more mass per x amount of time than you are. And the most funny thing about it is that I've never said I'm a good grower. I only remember calling myself a noob, which I am. I have a lot to learn and I'm sure I will get better and better. I hope to inspire at least few people though, that even a noob can grow for 1.6g per watt by vegging for 4 weeks and flowering for 10 weeks. Your “keeper” will likely be the plant with the highest stress resistance (giving you the most favorable outcome), but you will miss out on the plant that produces the best yield/flowers in optimal conditions (may, or may not be “one and the same”).
This is a very good point. Might miss out, but might not aswell (I hope). My last yield was so big that I didn't expect it to take so much time to trim. For that reason I couldn't pay enough attention on my vegging plants. They were kept under the same conditions, but got a bit stretched out. I can see that myself too. They just got transplanted into bigger pots and fortunately they will be under very good conditions from now on and they wil get to veg for another 2 weeks before I flip them. It’s funny, because it’s an analogy that I commonly use. “You can’t take a starved Ethiopian kid, feed him a few slices of pizza, pump him full of steroids, and expect gold in the Olympics”.
You want to talk condescendingly to us, but are here asking a fuck ton of stupid questions, and can’t grow to save your ass.
Press back and look at all the other threads out there and tell me again I am asking stupid questions Look at how much useful time you have already spent here thanks to my questions. I'm asking a growing related questions which this forum should be about. I'm asking my questions the way that pisses people off. Got it, but for some reason it makes many people try harder when discussing something. Are you retarded, trolling, a “Retarded Troll”. (Not a question)
However, it’s not too late for you. Much like the “runts” in veg, you’re still in your infancy, with a chance to “grow”. Given time, you might just turn around and surprise us all and turn into a decent grower. That, or your “Fail” is so epic that your plants fire you. If we were to implement your “ass-umption”, we’d cull you right now and toss your ass in the trash, but we won’t do that, because we know that there may still be hope.
Ye ye ye. Try and beat my 1.6g per watt, you lame smartass. I know you don't believe it thanks to your narrow and pessimistic way of looking at life, but that's the best part of it - I take it as a compliment and as a most satisfying moment to brag about my results. It's just that.