tomatoman66
New Member
I've seen a bunch of helpful posts regarding NPK ratios for veg and flower cycles. I'm landing on something like 1:1:1, and 1:1:2, respectively, with about .5 Ca, .3 Mg, and .2/.3 S
My questions is if anyone knows specifically whether or not people are referring to actual P and K, or P2O5, and K2O. A fertilizer label is giving % actual N, but not actual P and K amounts. Actual K = ~.83 of stated K2O, and actual P = .43 of stated P2O5. Gotta be careful when reading popular literature. It's designed for the average person, and these days, that ain't a very high bar.
Pretty sure people are saying P when they're technically referring to P2O5. There is a difference of more than a factor of 2, so it matters. For K, it's a small difference (.83 is pretty close to 1), but for P, it's much more significant (.43 is alot less than 1). If people are actually referring to P, that would help explain why so many bloom fertilizers are so high in P2O5. To get 4% P, you need 10% P2O5. Most seemingly technical things I've read suggest P ppm should be shockingly low, something like 20-40% of what actual N is!
In any event, the message seems to be that excessive P is bad, and to back off, especially given how many "bloom" fertilizers are very high in P. Having as much N as P during all phases of cannabis growth (except the very end/flushing time) seems smart
My questions is if anyone knows specifically whether or not people are referring to actual P and K, or P2O5, and K2O. A fertilizer label is giving % actual N, but not actual P and K amounts. Actual K = ~.83 of stated K2O, and actual P = .43 of stated P2O5. Gotta be careful when reading popular literature. It's designed for the average person, and these days, that ain't a very high bar.
Pretty sure people are saying P when they're technically referring to P2O5. There is a difference of more than a factor of 2, so it matters. For K, it's a small difference (.83 is pretty close to 1), but for P, it's much more significant (.43 is alot less than 1). If people are actually referring to P, that would help explain why so many bloom fertilizers are so high in P2O5. To get 4% P, you need 10% P2O5. Most seemingly technical things I've read suggest P ppm should be shockingly low, something like 20-40% of what actual N is!
In any event, the message seems to be that excessive P is bad, and to back off, especially given how many "bloom" fertilizers are very high in P. Having as much N as P during all phases of cannabis growth (except the very end/flushing time) seems smart