Oregon man jailed for collecting rainwater
- Thread starter Mr Neutron
- Start date
- Status
WyoGrow
Active Member
Well obviously you don't. So now use the half a brain you are referring to here and research what the federal government regulates concerning "navigable waters".
WyoGrow
Active Member
I brought up "navigable waters"....... and no, you haven't proven that aspect of my argument wrong. In fact you are just proving how little you actually understand WTF you are actually talking about. You don't have to be able to navigate a boat on it..... hell, it doesn't even need to have water in it year round for it to be covered by the NWPA.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
How does a front garden lower property values? Are property values of other people's property the deciding parameter in what you get to do with your own property?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
My town is making me paint the outside of the house or face 2700 dollar fine
medicineman
New Member
I must be blind as I cant see a real path of a dry creek anywhere near his "lake". What got my attention and probably is the real reason behind the controversy, is the proximity of his neighbors lake a few hundred yards down stream. I'd venture a guess that the neighbor had more than a casual interest in this guys water activities and this is probably way more political than purveyed in the local newspapers.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Aren't you the lucky one!
Post #38 #68
After post 68, you must have done a little research, cause you immediately backed off the navigable water argument. FAIL
I noticed the same thing and agree it must be some kind of dispute with a neighbor.
Looking at the property on Google Earth, it clearly shows no signs of any significant streams, creeks, tributaries or any other water source feeding into or out of any of the ponds.
The northern most damn was supposedly there for more than 37 years, had there been a prior problem with the officials, I'm sure it would have been mentioned in the news articles.
To me it reeks of a local political battle.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it doesn't if it is a nice garden.
if it is an eyesore, it does.
if there are neighborhood rules about uniformity, that decides what you get to do with your front yard.
the entitled, selfish libertarian attitude doesn't get to reign supreme over the wishes of the entire rest of the neighborhood. sorry.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you fail so fucking hard.
go check post #38. not a mention of "navigable water".
guess who did bring up navigable water in posts #37 and #39?
hint: he's a person whose main contributions have been failing, and who's lacking in the ability to use nitrogen properly.
you just make this entirely too easy for me to enjoy a laugh at your expense.
Wrong again, WyoGrow brought it up on post#34
Post#34
Post #38 You copy and pasting the Navigable Waters Act and defending it with your quote below.
Page #68 You copy and pasting the Navigable Waters Act once again and defending it with your quote below
Not only are you a dumb fuck that can't shut his mouth, you're a proven POS liar!
^ This guy is so lazy he doesn't even want to pump his own gas, lol.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
^this guy is so obsessed with me he starts a sock puppet and follows me around for a year. but he's totally not harboring any latent homosexual feelings.
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
Your arguments are so distorted that nobody knows what you're fighting over anymore... 
.....
.....
lifegoesonbrah
Well-Known Member
LOL do you really mail people gay porn? Thats pretty funny.
Nope. I never said you brought it up, I said you made the argument for it and lost, read much?
BTW, did you ever figure out that indoor plants need more than 12 hrs of light to sustain vegetative growth? LOL
Samwell Seed Well
Well-Known Member
captian obvious saves another life
- Status
Similar threads
