Micro-nutrients are more in the range of parts per billion and are difficult to measure accurately.
what % do you get growing the same strain as them?
The 30% THC claim is dubious, but to attribute that to micronutrient ratios, is preposterous.
I’m not growing the same strains that I know of, I am told this is a consistent way to get plants that are capable of producing 30%+ THC to do so. Do you have any advice you care to share?
Why is that?
genetics not nutrients.
Any stated TCH % should be taken with a large grain of salt, the larger the number, the larger the grain of salt.
Proof.
How do you propose they don’t? That’s what I’m trying to figure out, and to the people I talk to that do this for a living say that is a very real thing.
lol. that's not how this works.
I'll borrow rkymtnman's response
Then exactly how does this work?
Keep using custom hydros chelated mix, that's what I use. You can get some chelated Mn also from mbferts.com. Mix the chelated micros with the chelated mn at a rate of 2:1 and that'll give you the desired 1:1.2 ratio of Fe:Mn. You could also add more boron, here's what I use for every 640 gallons. FWIW everyone else is right, micros aren't going in increase THC like you've been told. If such a thing were true, don't you think someone would be making millions selling a nutrient line that guaranteed to give you 30% THC with 3rd party lab results?