Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7IYou have to admit that I described a democracy correctly. Because I did.
Citing examples such as gang rape and marijuana regulation bring questons of the degree to which the individual rights are exploited for the benefit of the majority.
Either you are on-board with the democratic process or you are not, in which case, as the saying goes, "love it or leave it".
I don't call it freedom, I call it democracy. And I'm not trying to claim it is perfect or really, today, even all that good. I agree with 86% of the country, in a recent CNN poll, who think government is broken.
Democrats are liberal; Republicans are conservative. They have, in the past, been able to legislate. Lately, they have not. Why? Because they no longer represent the people. They represent themselves and corporate America, to a large degree, and they have become ineffective legislators.
The "news" media, liberal and conservative, is in the business of ratings, not news. The result is an uninformed or misinformed electorate incapable of deciphering the real political truth. An informed electorate is a critical necessity in a democracy.
I think the only way out of this mess is to elect legislators who recognize the problems and want to fix them.
For instatnce, I don't agree with Ron Paul's social platform, I do agree that his economic policies are sound, ie I think they would result in an economy that would thrive. But, there would be chaos and suffering during the transition through a radical change in how America functions economically.
I also like Ron Paul because I think he is honest and believes what he says, and he does not cater to lobbyists.
I am totally disgusted by the Democrats for their postion on tort reform. It is contrary to their stated values and it is one of the issues at the core of the healthcare debate and, really, at the core of the lobbyist issue. Shame on them.
In summary, I think it is a bit more practical to talk about specifics that are relevant today, and leave the Democratic theory debate to the philosphers.
Perhaps this will explain my philosophy of freedom. I think freedom is always relevant, don't you?