Man o' the green
Active Member
Yes, it's unconstitutional.You ever heard of Social Security?
"The constitutional basis of the Social Security Act was uncertain. The basic problem is that under the "reserve clause" of the Constitution (the 10th Amendment) powers not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved for the States or the people. When the federal government seeks to expand its influence in new areas it must find some basis in the Constitution to justify its action. Obviously, the Constitution did not specifically mention the operation of a social insurance system as a power granted to the federal government! The Committee on Economic Security (CES) struggled with this and was unsure whether to claim the commerce clause or the broad power to levy taxes and expend funds to "provide for the general welfare," as the basis for the programs in the Act."
The supreme court struck down several social programs before FDR intimidated the SCOTUS to uphold his new deal policies. A reprehensible act considering the separation of powers. FDR was a dictator, the only way was by running over the constitution. The fact that he conducted the war well does not excuse him.