Harassing the family members of a dead vet is the act of a coward. They know damn well that what they are doing is hateful and to me the act of a coward.
Beating anyone for practicing free speech & peaceful assembly is more so the act of a coward, than those practicing these rights.
Anyone who physically assaults someone practicing their rights, knows damn well what they are doing, and it's a futile attempt to deny someone of their rights, at that given time. Thus it's the act of a coward, because only cowards try to deny other's rights via physical threats & assault.
I have a bank envelope in our safe at home with $1500 in it for such occasions. It's my "oops I got pinched and need bail $ fund.". I'm no bully, but I'd gladly take a charge for defending a bets family and allowing them
to bury their loved one in peace.
It's great that you can bail yourself out, but $1500 is pocket change as to what you will pay for physically assaulting someone, for what is not legally justified in any way, shape, or form.
Maybe it's because I'm a veteran, maybe it's because I have some kind of basic respect for people. If they wanna protest they have that right, just have some decency and don't harass a dead vets family. You don't see vets protesting and harrassing dead hippies families.
If you had a full sense of respect for people, you wouldn't threaten to deny them of their rights with physical force and/or intimidation. That's not respect, it's cowardice.
Again, free speech & peaceful assembly in the sense of this argument is not harassment. Of course the courts would like to change this, because society lacks thick-skin, and the courts love infringing on rights because of such people lacking thick-skin.
They wanna gather in a large group, so will we. They want to get people's ire up and they do. Save the morality bullshit for someone else. I have 0 respect for those fucks, spineless religious nuts. Let's see Jesus save them
from the beatings they all deserve.
And one who physically attempts to deny free speech & peaceful protest with physical force & intimidation, deserves no respect as well, and much less respect than someone simply practicing their rights. One who practices this type of right-denying cowardice, deserves beatings as well.
Sometimes standing up for what's right and decent isn't easy and involves risk. These people know damn well the reaction they're gonna get, they ask for it. You don't poke a bear and then act shocked when
said bear rips off your legs
The only reason they get the reaction they get, is because society is filled with cowards who lack thick-skin.
Preserving rights, is what's right. Denying rights on any premise is unacceptable. Sometimes it involves risk practicing rights, such as these protest-group gatherings.
Religion ultimately has no bearing on the basis of the argument, even though it's the premise as to why they are conducting themselves the way they are.
It's a free speech & peaceful assembly issue, first and foremost. Not a religious issue.
