Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
Should have left there to rot......
Obama now negotiates with terrorists
- Thread starter BigNBushy
- Start date
Mindmelted
Well-Known Member
The word would be deserter.
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
I love regurgitated talking points. Don't even have to watch the news anymore 
Him being a deserter is only a theory with no proof / evidence that I've seen. Feel free to prove me wrong...it makes for a good talking point tho. It's like the unemployment thing...crying bout unemployment being high, it drops down and it must be because people stopped looking for work LMAO. So we trade hostages for an American soldier...that's kinda good right? But wait! He has to be a deserter because shit...Obama can't do something positive.
For the record I hate all politicians n am def. not an Obama supporter. IMO the pres is like a mascot with some nice puppet strings attached / scapegoat for when shit goes south in any situation.
Him being a deserter is only a theory with no proof / evidence that I've seen. Feel free to prove me wrong...it makes for a good talking point tho. It's like the unemployment thing...crying bout unemployment being high, it drops down and it must be because people stopped looking for work LMAO. So we trade hostages for an American soldier...that's kinda good right? But wait! He has to be a deserter because shit...Obama can't do something positive.
For the record I hate all politicians n am def. not an Obama supporter. IMO the pres is like a mascot with some nice puppet strings attached / scapegoat for when shit goes south in any situation.
Last edited:
kinetic
Well-Known Member
Some members of the GOP invoked Reagan when they voted for the amendment that disallows the dea from busting mmj dispensaries. Shouldn't they invoke his name rightously in this matter as well? The man did negotiate with Iranian terrorists when he gave them weapons for hostages.....
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
I'm guessing you don't know the meaning of "primary source" then, no?I love regurgitated talking points. Don't even have to watch the news anymore
Him being a deserter is only a theory with no proof / evidence that I've seen. Feel free to prove me wrong...it makes for a good talking point tho. It's like the unemployment thing...crying bout unemployment being high, it drops down and it must be because people stopped looking for work LMAO. So we trade hostages for an American soldier...that's kinda good right? But wait! He has to be a deserter because shit...Obama can't do something positive.
For the record I hate all politicians n am def. not an Obama supporter. IMO the pres is like a mascot with some nice puppet strings attached / scapegoat for when shit goes south in any situation.
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
I thought it meant Fox News when going after Obama or MSNBC when defending him?
I can say I saw a fuckin Unicorn and a primary news source confirmed it. Is that a true statement now? "I've Read" doesn't translate to "fact" for me."Folks, this is either a very bad case of Stockholm Syndrome or something far more nefarious is at stake," West wrote. "Regardless, there is more to this than meets the eye of Obama making a unilateral decision and announcement on a Saturday — when he believes no one is watching."
Lmfao...no one watching the President...
The left and right are both nutjob extremists for the most part when it comes to media, but the right is a lot easier for me to make fun of. Some of that shit is just...
Last edited:
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
How the fuck can news be a primary source?I thought it meant Fox News when going after Obama or MSNBC when defending him?
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
It can't. That's called a joke. News is supposed to be an outlet that provides us with info from primary sources n shit, but people act like they are a primary source a lot of times. You knew what I meant, I'd hope.
Show me the document.
Don't pick and choose parts of what I said (I see a good one u could use) to find a discrepancy or minor fluke. Give a real answer. It's a theory / speculation with no proof. That's the answer.
Last edited:
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
he's just pulling a reagan
Reagan gave arms for hostages. Arms that could not be used against us, our interests or our allies.
Obama gave terrorists for a hostage. Terrorists that may well act against us, our interests, or our allies.
I see how that's the same.
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
why couldn't the guns be used against us? were they smart guns?
No, they were just very far away.
greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
He deserted his post, deserted his platoon, and deserted his military oath ( which by the way he gladly joined, he wasn't drafted ) to seek out the Taliban ( listen to his platoons words ). He is a deserter plain and simple and he should be debriefed and then court martialed to a life in a place in Kansas. He is not a HERO, he is a deserter.
WORDZofWORDZCRAFT
Well-Known Member
oh how did they get hostages if they were to far away?
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Fun facts about Reagan lmao:
Reagan's Greatest Hits
Reagan's Greatest Hits
bu$hleaguer
Well-Known Member
Obama is pretty anti-military I think. This goes right along with his MO. UP UNTIL NOW, we didn't negotiate with terrorists. Now it's open season.
ayr0n
Well-Known Member
Why would we trade hostages for a Taliban member? are u guys serious lmao?? Show me. I need proof. If he was seeking out the Taliban why would he be held hostage by them? I'm confused on this bit...seems to shit on ur talking points a little. Could be wrong but it doesn't add up for me.
DonAlejandroVega
Well-Known Member
if the Taliban can make deals with terrorists.........why shouldn't we. we are the biggest thing in terrorism since Ashurbanipal of Assyria.