Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
Much of it? Hardly.did you note the part where i grant that your motives are not race-related?
are you trying to skirt the fact that much of this IS race-related?
Some of it? Probably. And it's not isolated to the Right either.
Rhetorical question: Are the vicious attacks on Sarah Palin masking an underlying and widespread plague of misogyny in the Democratic party?
You do remember John McCain, I trust. There was considerable speculation over his eligibility to serve as President. He withheld nothing.hahahahahahahaha. right.
i remember when they hounded bush to show his long form. i was around when they were asking how reagan got into whatever college he went to.
did i mention hahahahahahahahahaha already?
Apparently the game you are playing is that the Left is free of the scourge of bigotry.bullshit. i see the game you are playing.
race bait the left. when the left points out the race component, call them race baiters and accuse them of playing the race card. frame yourself as the innocent victim. talk about all the racism against whites.
you poor, persecuted white christians. always having to suffer a war on christmas and whatnot. you poor, poor souls.
boo fucking hoo.
Surely you are not throwing me in with the 'War on Christmas' crowd. If you recall I'm the one who opposes 'In god we trust" on the currency.
Although the South is very Conservative, it is also heavily Democrat.many other parts of the country are fiercely conservative yet went for the 'flaming liberal progressive' (snark? yes, snark!).
or do you deny that the midwest is fiercely conservative?
did i mention snark?
Hear that? That's your flimsy theory going out the window.
Snark spelled backwards is krans.edit: look at fucking utah. all blue. are they not fiercely conservative? again, snark.
edit #2: those liberal fucking mormons. fucking amateurs!