Nugbuckets Lab

ColdArmySoldier

Well-Known Member
do you use a ring light? or find yourself using a ring flash mostly?
I only use my ring flash (worth the extra money). I don't like the ring lights because most of them just stay on all the time and they don't communicate with your camera. Ring flashes with i-TTL allow the camera to adjust its exposure settings to compensate for the flash, just like the flash built into the camera. Plus a lot of ring lights just don't get bright enough. While I usually use manual aperture/shutter speed mode (I have it hooked up to my Mac using Sofortbild, a free program that lets you adjust all the setting on your camera -aperture, shutter speed, exposure, etc.- along with take pictures remotely), I can still get some pretty awesome pictures from automatic modes (such as the "macro" mode). I have an older Nikon D40.
 

Bobotrank

Well-Known Member
Ring lights are nice because they are shadowless... They get in every crack and crevice, and make your trichs pop nicely. Great for a fill when used in conjunction with overhead and/or backlighting. Gotta run. :peace:
 

nugbuckets

Well-Known Member
Shes coming down!
300
shots into this project, and i finally got the shot i was looking for!.....thought she was too ripe, but she pulled it off!......moved my whole scene outside in the wind, but nailed it anyway........i am really happy with this shot!..........very busy weekend wrapping up the "main-lining" gig with the harvest and documentation of this plant......am putting together something really nice for you nerds to check out Sunday night.....bringing it full circle baby!....stay tuned.......;-)

subcool#7.jpg
 

nugbuckets

Well-Known Member

quick update.......

sun scene getting ready, veggies killin' it.........the torched cheesequakes doing really well.........and the cody-less "qush that could".....going reeeeeeaaaaalllll sloooow.....

single cola 004.jpgsingle cola 005.jpgsingle cola 006.jpgsingle cola 007.jpg
 

murp

Member
Shes coming down!
300
shots into this project, and i finally got the shot i was looking for!.....
Very beautiful, Nugs, a bloom and a shot to remember....congrats. This is the kind of shot that keeps me coming back to these forums, that plus new info like your mainlining method. Excellent work dude all around, dude, thanks for contributing it.
 

farmerEd

Active Member
just want to say...you are an inspiration brother!!
went out today and bought some pretty nice tomato cages from HD...man they were pricey tho like 7.00 bucks a piece


but yea keep doing what you do
Ed
 

ThatGuy113

Well-Known Member
Shes coming down!
300
shots into this project, and i finally got the shot i was looking for!.....thought she was too ripe, but she pulled it off!......moved my whole scene outside in the wind, but nailed it anyway........i am really happy with this shot!..........very busy weekend wrapping up the "main-lining" gig with the harvest and documentation of this plant......am putting together something really nice for you nerds to check out Sunday night.....bringing it full circle baby!....stay tuned.......;-)

View attachment 2223525

Cant wait to see it



....also the pic is fantastic.
 

Robear

Member
in the process of training my blackberry cut and i currently have 16 heads on the plant. i am itching to top it one more time to get 32 , then training into a tomato cage and aiming for 2 ft colas.
my questions
1. is 32 too much, im looking for rocks. no fluff. would 32 be too thick of a canopy to work for this method?
2. is a 2 ft cola too long, would a more compact plant be better for the dense nugs that are achieved.

any insight is appreciated thanks
 

nugbuckets

Well-Known Member
in the process of training my blackberry cut and i currently have 16 heads on the plant. i am itching to top it one more time to get 32 , then training into a tomato cage and aiming for 2 ft colas.
my questions
1. is 32 too much, im looking for rocks. no fluff. would 32 be too thick of a canopy to work for this method?
2. is a 2 ft cola too long, would a more compact plant be better for the dense nugs that are achieved.

any insight is appreciated thanks
i think 16 works real good.....8 is the best for longer colas, then 16, 32 is best for a short very wide, scrog type of scene....
 

nugbuckets

Well-Known Member
Soil test......trunk detail........my Amish mix producing 1.5X the trunk mass....the right pic is panned closer, but if you look at the lighter, the trunk on the left is as wide as the lighter, the right, not so much!....check out the difference in "knuckling"!.....she is obviously absorbing enough Calcium!;-)
9.jpg10.jpg
 
Top