#NRAlogic

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
go back and read the my posts that you glossed over while you were calling people names.
this thread was actually starting to devolve into reality until you came back talking about how your AR15 will overpower tanks, drones, and jets.

and you're too much of a vagina to explain it again, because you know it's a laughable, idiotic fantasy that exists only in minds as deluded as yours.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
that will be great in a fight against a government after we've had enough and they've spent every dime we've given them (now) and the dimes of my children (now) and grandchildren (soon), great great grandchildren (in 50 years).

the right to bear arms is not for hunting, it's for defense against a tyrannical government which every government has proven to devolve into over time, bar none.

the end
That's the logic that'll serve you well. Don't try and stop the problem with activism or protesting en masse, wait until the problem get's so bad you guys descend into civil war and have no choice but to fight, in more ways than one. I hope you're not involved with oncology...
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
even that is fantasy, but not as fantasy as a bunch of hicks with AR15s and no supply lines taking down the greatest military power the world has ever seen.
Well it was suggested here that they all just shoot into the airframe of the aircraft to bring them down :roll: I guess with the tanks they will just point their AR and demand the tanks to stop
 

echelon1k1

New Member
even that is fantasy, but not as fantasy as a bunch of hicks with AR15s and no supply lines taking down the greatest military power the world has ever seen.
mrsoetoros presidency also needs invasive surgery to cut out the cancers - his supporters aren't much better...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well it was suggested here that they all just shoot into the airframe of the aircraft to bring them down :roll: I guess with the tanks they will just point their AR and demand the tanks to stop
i don't think they'll even get to fire a shot.

just cut off their supply lines until they starve. they'll come out waving a white flag in exchange for a decent chinese food buffet.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
i don't think they'll even get to fire a shot.

just cut off their supply lines until they starve. they'll come out waving a white flag in exchange for a decent chinese food buffet.
because they can't hunt?

I think what you are missing is that not all of us think like they do where you are. If it was bad enough that people were "taking up arms" against the government, they would have a lot of help. Food, weapons and shelter would be available for years.

1st, I can't see the military firing on those they swore to protect (unless they get brainwashed into believing we are all traitors, a real possibility). 2nd, I can't see bombing. 3rd, Have you not seen Red Dawn? There was an Aussie version that was even better (girls were hotter) called Tomorrow When the War Began or something like that. If you watch either of these movies you would know that a group of teenagers could bring down an army if they are really sneaky.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I take it you haven't seen the movies?

Seriously though, it's obvious through your posts that you believe people would shrivel up and die without our government. People survived before it, during it, and we will after it. Another will rise and take it's place, rinse and repeat. Disarming the populace speed this process up. You seem to think that if we open the door just a crack some crazy Fienstein type won't shove it open.

Also, yes, we do think that is the end game goal of your side. Baby steps. You succeeded in cracking the single payer door open (it's inevitable now, we can't survive what we've created) while lying about what Obamacare was, you guys can't be trusted and most people are now realizing this.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
because they can't hunt?

I think what you are missing is that not all of us think like they do where you are. If it was bad enough that people were "taking up arms" against the government, they would have a lot of help. Food, weapons and shelter would be available for years.

1st, I can't see the military firing on those they swore to protect (unless they get brainwashed into believing we are all traitors, a real possibility). 2nd, I can't see bombing. 3rd, Have you not seen Red Dawn? There was an Aussie version that was even better (girls were hotter) called Tomorrow When the War Began or something like that. If you watch either of these movies you would know that a group of teenagers could bring down an army if they are really sneaky.
Thanks for the laugh
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
which is exactly what i said.



so close. you were doing so well.

but it's actually the complete opposite. his mom was lying in bed in her pajamas when she got four to the dome.

it's not that he had to kill his mom to get the guns, clearly he got the guns to kill his mom.
Ooh soo close, but wrong.

Lanza killed his mother with her pistol she kept nearby, then he got the big guns.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you're still in this deluded mindset where your AR15 is gonna fend off the government.

just pathetic. pathetic beyond words.
Correct, you need an AK-47 or variant to do that. Look at Afghanistan, shithole country with a tiny population was able to hold off the 2 greatest superpowers of the last century with little more than rocks and Aks.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
then tell me about how your AR15 is gonna totally defeat a battalion of tanks flanked by fighter jets.

you have such a great grasp on reality, it should be no problem.
Talk about deluded. LOL someone thinks that government would send a hundred billion dollars worth of equipment and men, plus all the support for those things just to get you out of your bunker. LOL he doesn't realize that government has to pay for these things and when you are actively hunting the tax base, chances are they stopped paying their annual tribute. In no scenario does government send a tank or a fighter jet after a single ordinary person just because that person has a rifle.

When Buck goes to get groceries he drives several states away in a jacked up blown suburban getting 4mpg and throwing $50 bills out the window at each stop. He wonders why he is going broke and can no longer drive to Montana for groceries but instead has to shop at the local market and drive a vehicle that gets a sensible amount of miles from a liter of petrol.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
i don't think they'll even get to fire a shot.

just cut off their supply lines until they starve. they'll come out waving a white flag in exchange for a decent chinese food buffet.
Your talking about people termed "preppers" here, you know, the kind of fella who stores away 2-5 years worth of food and supplies? People with 300,000 rounds of ammo for each caliber, generators, solar panels, underground hideouts. Diesel tanks of a hundred thousand gallons buried in the ground, the means to produce food and turn bad water into good.

For some reason i just think you haven't REALLY given it much thought at all.

What happens when the number one economy in the world is removed from the global scene? Think a bank failure was bad?

How many countries would side with the rebels and provide them aid, arms and support?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Your talking about people termed "preppers" here, you know, the kind of fella who stores away 2-5 years worth of food and supplies? People with 300,000 rounds of ammo for each caliber, generators, solar panels, underground hideouts. Diesel tanks of a hundred thousand gallons buried in the ground, the means to produce food and turn bad water into good.

For some reason i just think you haven't REALLY given it much thought at all.

What happens when the number one economy in the world is removed from the global scene? Think a bank failure was bad?

How many countries would side with the rebels and provide them aid, arms and support?
are these the same people to claim to own a m203 with no paperwork, no tax stamp and for 500 coins on the internet:roll::finger:
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
are these the same people to claim to own a m203 with no paperwork, no tax stamp and for 500 coins on the internet:roll::finger:
Is this coming from the guy who says grenade launchers are classified as firearms? Or is this coming from the guy who makes up shit?

FYI A M203 with a 37mm barrel is still a M203, you can buy the barrel separate, but gotta pay the price. No difference really, not like anyone without substantial resources could ever hope to own more than a couple of the explosive rounds, although they aren't illegal to own. The 37mm does everything i need it to do without the expense. No reason to have a 40 unless you can afford the explosive rounds. I hear it said on the interwebs that the 37mm training rounds can be easily modified to go boom, but I wouldn't know anything about that.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Is this coming from the guy who says grenade launchers are classified as firearms? Or is this coming from the guy who makes up shit?
show me where I said this or you LIE again...the rest of the shit you said was again bullshit so need to show it:finger: 37mm flare launcher is not a m203grenade launcher. It fires distress flares from a 37mm smooth bore and cannot accept 40mm munitions.
 
Top