New Obama ad

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
would you go away already... that is to j.green^^^^^^^^ your either a bot or a person who's brain is wired way wrong because youre not even responding anywhere near what a person should respond when making a statement in response to someone else...

you still have yet to prove that your not an auto generated user...

answer my questions like i asked earlier and ill leave you alone for good...

what was the name of what used to be the 9th planet?

and how do you feel???
 

deprave

New Member
There wouldn't be crack or meth and people wouldn't do those 2 drugs..It would be rare..I bet teenagers wouldn't be distilling alchol from hand santizer, doing whippits, and drinking cough syrup either....
 

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
anyways back to the thread... i guess its on the law and the legal system...

if any of you are interested in learning a little bit more about it i made a painstakingly long post in the legal edge forum... and on page 18-19 i put up some posts where that most people are oblivious(not their fault but they have been lied to) and that they should know that it is PERFECTLY LAWFUL TO CONSUME WHATEVER YOU WANT TO...

so just sayin if anyone cares to further educate themselves i thought id put it out there... i hope you all recognize whats at stake...
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
There wouldn't be crack or meth and people wouldn't do those 2 drugs..It would be rare..I bet teenagers wouldn't be distilling alchol from hand santizer, doing whippits, and drinking cough syrup either....
Snorting bath salts, smoking spice, yeah I completely agree, but look at tobacco, so addictive, so deadly, so widely accepted. I would hate for meth to be like that.
 

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
some people and you guys may already know the info... but just saying that way people can have the knowledge to take a stand...
 

deprave

New Member
Snorting bath salts, smoking spice, yeah I completely agree, but look at tobacco, so addictive, so deadly, so widely accepted. I would hate for meth to be like that.
It wouldn't be, those drugs only exists cause they are a cheap way to get high...most people wouldn't do crack and meth or would never start if you could buy actuall real drugs for cheap lol
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
No way man, some morality needs to be legislated. People are dumb about what they put in their bodies, I volunteer every Saturday at an addiction clinic that uses Ibogaine to treat addiction. Meth is as bad as Reagan said weed is, worse. That shit can't ever be legal imo.
 

deprave

New Member
I don't think it would of ever existed or been popular, if people could get real drugs from the market for cheap then why would they get those crappy wannabe drugs? They would get real cocaine, marijuana, opiates..

people wouldn't break up cocaine into Crack Rocks to sell....and they wouldn't be cooking explosives from sudafed...

There wouldn't be this attitude of..."OMG WHATEVER I CAN GET MY HANDS ON TO GET HIGH!!!" it wouldn't be so seductive either. The attitudes would change I think and it would be just looked at as medicine more and more. Not "Fun"...Sure there will still be people who become addicts but it would be dramaticlly less.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
I wish you luck with your favorite beverage.

View attachment 2148096
No Koolaid. Obama is at least 1,000 times more of a statist bitch than Paul. My only worry about Paul is "states rights" which only deflects issues. In many ways states rights is worse. Like marijuana. You think you're safe, but incriminate yourself because the state knows, then the state is "forced" to help the feds. But the state gets a portion of the bust!

I also have moral issues against Paul. He's personally a very bigoted person. He knows his time as president would only be one term. So he will do all he can to ban the big bad queer and overturn a Roe v Wade and in its place make a federal law banning it. While I have no problems with abortion being illegal, it's just the principle of him lying about not doing it. Also he wants to get rid of health care insurance, medicare and HMOs. I don't much agree with those either, but it took almost 40 years to get us here, it'll take more than four to phase it out. Unless Paul wants to get rid of the market sydtem. But isn't he for that? Which means for four years the medical industry will hold us hostage and use extortion to get us to vote a new president to play ball.

This is no way an Obama endorsement. He's worse than Lincoln, FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Nixon, HW Bush and Clinton combined. He needs to go. It doesn't matter who replaces him. That racist, anti-American, dumb fuck is the worst thing to happen to us. He's fooled the dumb idiots in America you can get everything for nothing and when he's failed to do so, they still lick his cock dry.
 

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
I don't think it would of ever existed or been popular, if people could get real drugs from the market for cheap then why would they get those crappy wannabe drugs? They would get real cocaine, marijuana, opiates..

people wouldn't break up cocaine into Crack Rocks to sell....and they wouldn't be cooking explosives from sudafed...

There wouldn't be this attitude of..."OMG WHATEVER I CAN GET MY HANDS ON TO GET HIGH!!!" it wouldn't be so seductive either. The attitudes would change I think and it would be just looked at as medicine more and more. Not "Fun"...Sure there will still be people who become addicts but it would be dramaticlly less.
exactly... just look at the countries which have changed and decriminalized drugs and or didnt go after them or really enforce them like they do in the us...

their crime rates went down and so did drug use INCLUDING harder drugs such as heroin etc...
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
It would seem like a novel idea in our culture, but addiction has been a problem for centuries. It was the British Empire's favorite way of suppressing Chinese social order for a couple centuries. History just doesn't agree with the view point that legalizing everything would result in the problem going away. Addiction, use, possession, even buying it can be legalized, with punishments replaced with addiction treatment (treat addiction as the disease it is) but making it legal to distribute is asking for problems.

You are never going to get doctors to agree that complete legalization is wise.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Any idiot could make and sell drugs, it wouldn't be coming from overseas, they would all be from Bob down the street.
They'd be made by Canna Sylvan of this forum, if legal. I don't have any moral issues with anyone killing themselves with drugs. If you're stupid, not my problem. There are tons more stupid people I can make money off of.
 

cannofbliss

Well-Known Member
cant +rep u deprave but tried to...

you brought up two very good points this one being the later about kids use... ;)

again like i said earlier in addition to your points...

to abandon...

just look at how drug use went down in the netherlands...

just follow their example as it has been proven to reduce even teenage use... like deprave said perfectly... they said the same thing there that it no longer had the same appeal, and the thrill was lost and thus no longer became cool...
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
fuck morals lol
The morally wrong thing to do would be for me to stop you from doing what you really want to do. If it doesn't harm me or others, do it till you die for all I care. But the moment you harm others or me doing your shit, I'll be after you faster than an Obama supporter can ejaculate to his picture.
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
I don't think kids would do drugs..it wouldn't be cool anymore.
Portugal is just some backward country. It only works for countries with nothing to lose.

Funny how liberals are so for the disadvantaged, but the same people they love, they treat with disdain. The liberal treats them worse than the KKK treats blacks and jews. The ones liberals advocate for aren't human to them, they're just pets.
 

deprave

New Member
Portugal is just some backward country. It only works for countries with nothing to lose.

Funny how liberals are so for the disadvantaged, but the same people they love, they treat with disdain. The liberal treats them worse than the KKK treats blacks and jews. The ones liberals advocate for aren't human to them, they're just pets.
What the hell are you mumbling about?
 
Top