Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

Genetically Engineered Cannabis yes or no?

  • Total voters
    369
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Click to expand...

"Obama betrays America yet again by signing the 'Monsanto Protection Act' into law"

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039668_Monsanto_Protection_Act_Obama_deception_GMOs.html#ixzz2P2gIxYkz

Thursday, March 28, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Excerpt:
"(NaturalNews) President Barack Obama campaigned on promises to end secret prisons, decriminalize marijuana, balance the budget, honor the Second Amendment and make health care affordable. But what really unfolded was an explosion in the national debt (now $16 trillion and climbing), the signing of the NDAA, a claimed new power to kill any American at any time, even on U.S. soil, the use of military drones to murder American children overseas, a full-on assault against the Bill of Rights, a doubling of health insurance rates and the destruction of the U.S. economy.

But that's not all.

Now Obama has signed the "Monsanto Protection Act" into law, stabbing America in the heart yet again and proving that no matter how convincing politicians appear on the campaign trail, they are still sociopathic liars in the end."

Bill Summary & Status
113th Congress (2013 - 2014)
H.R.933
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:h.r.933:
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Or, I could say, Obama avoided letting certain types of tree huggers betray America, by signing the Bill.

Just a point of view.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
What is the actual title of the bill? "Monsanto Protection Act" is deliberately pejorative, tarring the entire act with the brush of one piratical firm. cn
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Of course it's not called that. And the only reason anyone reads these hate spew rags is to learn how to hate spew.

H.R.933
Latest Title: Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013
Sponsor: Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] (introduced 3/4/2013) Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills: H.RES.99, H.R.1265, S.444
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 113-6 [GPO: Text, PDF]
Note: A House explanatory statement was printed in the March 6, 2013, Congressional Record, beginning on page H1029. A Senate explanatory statement was printed in the March 11, 2013, Congressional Record, beginning on page S1287.

Someone search these links and show me even one mention of Monsanto. I could not find it. And I can't find anyone printing the specific provision of this Law that allows what is claimed.

Please show me the text, and I will judge it.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
H. R. 933—35
SEC. 735. In the event that a determination of non-regulated status made pursuant to section 411 of

the Plant Protection Act is or has been invalidated or vacated, the Secretary of Agriculture shall,

notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon request by a farmer, grower, farm operator, or producer,

immediately grant emporary permit(s) or temporary deregulation in part, subject to

necessary and appropriate conditions consistent with section 411(a) or 412(c) of the Plant Protection

Act, which interim conditions shall authorize the movement, introduction, continued cultivation,

commercialization and other specifically enumerated activities and requirements, including measures

designed to mitigate or minimize potential adverse environmental effects, if any, relevant to the

Secretary’s evaluation of the petition for non-regulated status, while ensuring that growers or other

users are able to move, plant, cultivate, introduce into commerce and carry out other authorized

activities in a timely manner: Provided, That all such conditions shall be applicable only for the interim

period necessary for the Secretary to complete any required analyses or consultations related

to the petition for non-regulated status: Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed

as limiting the Secretary’s authority under section 411, 412 and 414 of the Plant Protection Act.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
H. R. 933—35
SEC. 735. In the event that a determination of non-regulated status made pursuant to section 411 of

the Plant Protection Act is or has been invalidated or vacated, the Secretary of Agriculture shall,

notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon request by a farmer, grower, farm operator, or producer,

immediately grant emporary permit(s) or temporary deregulation in part, subject to

necessary and appropriate conditions consistent with section 411(a) or 412(c) of the Plant Protection

Act, which interim conditions shall authorize the movement, introduction, continued cultivation,

commercialization and other specifically enumerated activities and requirements, including measures

designed to mitigate or minimize potential adverse environmental effects, if any, relevant to the

Secretary’s evaluation of the petition for non-regulated status, while ensuring that growers or other

users are able to move, plant, cultivate, introduce into commerce and carry out other authorized

activities in a timely manner: Provided, That all such conditions shall be applicable only for the interim

period necessary for the Secretary to complete any required analyses or consultations related

to the petition for non-regulated status: Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed

as limiting the Secretary’s authority under section 411, 412 and 414 of the Plant Protection Act.
Click to expand...
lulz. i couldnt even find sec 735 in the version of the bill passed by the senate and house.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c113:6:./temp/~c113JBzkV0:: this is the Enrolled Bill, as it will become law, and theres no sec.735 at all in the index.

is this all bullshit or am i just to Easter Bunny Baked to see it?

further the text you have provided doesnt grant immunity to monsanto or any company, it allows cultivators to apply for a waiver when a plant's regulatory status is in question so they can grow it until the issue is settled.

thats the way our system works, if it's not ILLEGAL or the legality is in question, the assumption is that it is LEGAL.

this section (if still in the bill) has Fuck All to do with monsanto. it's just more hyperbole and fearmongering.


edit, found it, it's in Title IV, under General Provisions.

im too high.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
DNAprotection said:
"Obama betrays America yet again by signing the 'Monsanto Protection Act' into law"

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039668_Monsanto_Protection_Act_Obama_deception_GMOs.html#ixzz2P2gIxYkz

Thursday, March 28, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

Excerpt:
"(NaturalNews) President Barack Obama campaigned on promises to end secret prisons, decriminalize marijuana, balance the budget, honor the Second Amendment and make health care affordable. But what really unfolded was an explosion in the national debt (now $16 trillion and climbing), the signing of the NDAA, a claimed new power to kill any American at any time, even on U.S. soil, the use of military drones to murder American children overseas, a full-on assault against the Bill of Rights, a doubling of health insurance rates and the destruction of the U.S. economy.

But that's not all.

Now Obama has signed the "Monsanto Protection Act" into law, stabbing America in the heart yet again and proving that no matter how convincing politicians appear on the campaign trail, they are still sociopathic liars in the end."

Bill Summary & Status
113th Congress (2013 - 2014)
H.R.933
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:h.r.933:
Click to expand...
and again, instead of citing the evidence for your outrageous claims, you throw out more blogger's claims and eco-loon website assertions as "proof.

the relevant section does not even appear to be in the link to the entire giant bill dealing with every facet of the government.
you threw out wild accusations and then bumped a raw bill on our laps as if we should all read the thing, which you havent read, obviously, rather than the relevant portion.

you assume nobody will sit down with a tumbler of whiskey and read the thing line by line, which is what i just had to do, and theres SHIT about legal protection for anyone, just waives for plant cultivars in regulatory limbo

youre full of shit.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I had to go to the top of Thomas and search for the bill. H. R. 933. Then get the Text. (down in the chooser boxes about in the middle of the row. I used .pdf to search for 735.

I checked and this is from the certified copy passed into Law.
 
Figong

Figong

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
and again, instead of citing the evidence for your outrageous claims, you throw out more blogger's claims and eco-loon website assertions as "proof.

the relevant section does not even appear to be in the link to the entire giant bill dealing with every facet of the government.
you threw out wild accusations and then bumped a raw bill on our laps as if we should all read the thing, which you havent read, obviously, rather than the relevant portion.

you assume nobody will sit down with a tumbler of whiskey and read the thing line by line, which is what i just had to do, and theres SHIT about legal protection for anyone, just waives for plant cultivars in regulatory limbo

youre full of shit.
Click to expand...
Agreed, when the same mofo writes articles with subjects like this: "USDA agricultural census program is a covert surveillance operation to compile government database of food and farm assets" I can't help but wonder what the fuck he's smoking - he must have some really really good shit.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Yeah, I had to go to the top of Thomas and search for the bill. H. R. 933. Then get the Text. (down in the chooser boxes about in the middle of the row. I used .pdf to search for 735.

I checked and this is from the certified copy passed into Law.
Click to expand...
since it's such a sweeping and devastating knife in the back of the eco-loon lobby i figured it should be in the index. but it's just a minor procedural change to grant waivers to farmers who wnat to grow a crop not regulated, but not declared Un-Regulated during the "we dont know" period of government deliberation.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
and again, instead of citing the evidence for your outrageous claims, you throw out more blogger's claims and eco-loon website assertions as "proof.

the relevant section does not even appear to be in the link to the entire giant bill dealing with every facet of the government.
you threw out wild accusations and then bumped a raw bill on our laps as if we should all read the thing, which you havent read, obviously, rather than the relevant portion.

you assume nobody will sit down with a tumbler of whiskey and read the thing line by line, which is what i just had to do, and theres SHIT about legal protection for anyone, just waives for plant cultivars in regulatory limbo

youre full of shit.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure I said this in post #2 or #3...

(Of the "Monsanto Protection Act" thread apparently, I must be too baked to distinguish between these two piece of shit threads).
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
I realize, as usual, it's the opposite of what the Luddites say it is. The same with DC vs Heller.

The truly stupid among the Earth First types would dearly love to ruin an entire crop season to make a point. And this is what our system is for. It's for WE, not the fringe Henny Pennys that MAKE MONEY from gloom and doom.

This is a new limit on the progressive judiciary to keep them from messing with cropping the food supply.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
I'm pretty sure I said this in post #2 or #3...

(Of the "Monsanto Protection Act" thread apparently, I must be too baked to distinguish between these two piece of shit threads).
Click to expand...
What you using? I'm not a indica guy, but damn this stuff called Granddaddy Purp was awesome. The flavor nice. It didn't couch lock me.

I need to grow me some. But I've no idea what to get. There's a few types, like: original, Bay 11, Candyland, Phantom Cookies and Ken's.

I usually HATE indica.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
What you using? I'm not a indica guy, but damn this stuff called Granddaddy Purp was awesome. The flavor nice. It didn't couch lock me.

I need to grow me some. But I've no idea what to get. There's a few types, like: original, Bay 11, Candyland, Phantom Cookies and Ken's.

I usually HATE indica.
Click to expand...
This is mall dope but it seems sorta 50/50% indica/sativa.

Iv got total "shampoo effect" going last few days tho, time is somewhat distorted and smaller details are messy.

So overall, it's doing it job ;)
 
Callisto

Callisto

Member
that monk woman was kind of trippy but anyone can do that just fill your lungs up with air and you'll float while still breathing ....buoyancy
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
d4n said:
Control the food and you control the world. Montsanto can suck my sweaty balls.
Click to expand...
monsanto doesnt control food, they sell chemicals fertilizers pesticides and entirely optional GMO cultivars.

why is this so hard for you guys to understand?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top