Hobbitgoblin
Well-Known Member
That's literary the opposite if this thread. But here both ways.What makes you think I was talking to you, lol?
That's literary the opposite if this thread. But here both ways.What makes you think I was talking to you, lol?
I didn't know that one needed to be directed to answer your posts. My bad.What makes you think I was talking to you, lol?
I remember that. I watched it.
Essentially yes. On that Doc Holiday levelI remember that. I watched it.
I guess it just comes down to who's the bigger badass.
The argument is two people fighting without sanctioned rules. A street fight as in two people fighting in the street. Like the thousands of street fights that happen across each country each day. When you add weapons that changes the entire argument. Why even say "boxer vs. MMA fighter"? Just say "guy with a knife vs guy without knife." Yes, anyone can have a weapon at any given time, and a deadly weapon trumps technical skill 99% of the time. That's not profound.Uh
Where do you think all those great boxers came from
The streets?
only thing limits a boxer is “rules” as to what they train to do
Plenty of bad men boxed
Cut loose a 156 lb mma “ bad ass on me in my prime and I would give him two shots before I took him outThe argument is two people fighting without sanctioned rules. A street fight as in two people fighting in the street. Like the thousands of street fights that happen across each country each day. When you add weapons that changes the entire argument. Why even say "boxer vs. MMA fighter"? Just say "guy with a knife vs guy without knife." Yes, anyone can have a weapon at any given time, and a deadly weapon trumps technical skill 99% of the time. That's not profound.
But for the sake of argument, is the boxer wearing his laced up gloves during the altercation, and does he get to begin the battle holding the unsheathed knife? If he has to retrieve it from his persons with gloves on I'm still going with the MMA fighter.
The Apple wins 90% of the time.Cut loose a 156 lb mma “ bad ass on me in my prime and I would give him two shots before I took him out
Non professional ambidextrous natural born fighter
The thing it is just apples to oranges
I’m not a fan of either sport but to believe mma fighters are the bad asses they claim let’s let other nfl linemen play and check results
Rhonda couldn’t whip my thigh for Pete’s sake
Anyone who chooses to fight on any capacity thinks they are a badass. That has nothing to do with it. Some fighters just have a wider skillset that can be used to exploit the vulnerabilities of less diverse fighters. It's been a long time Since Rhonda fought. She did not have a diverse skillset, and got destroyed once she started facing high level mixed martial artists.Cut loose a 156 lb mma “ bad ass on me in my prime and I would give him two shots before I took him out
Non professional ambidextrous natural born fighter
The thing it is just apples to oranges
I’m not a fan of either sport but to believe mma fighters are the bad asses they claim let’s let other nfl linemen play and check results
Rhonda couldn’t whip my thigh for Pete’s sake
I'd actually pay for pay per view for this fight. I already know who's gonna win though.Also there are quite a few ex-football players who have fought. A 90% chance is probably more accurate because anyone has a puncher's change. Traditionally the MMA guy would wait until you swung to shoot for a takedown. Nowadays you would probably just have your ankle kicked out before you got the chance. Some of these dudes would tumble into a leglock and destroy your mobility for months. You, me and everyone else on this forum would get smeshed to death by a smaller sized high level Dagestani. But if I have command over military grade weaponry, I could wipe all of Dagestan off of the map.