Michigan Medical Card and Gun Law

chemphlegm said:

with friends like that...
lawyers always tell us how much worse it would be if...... that makes us feel better about the cash we give to the justus system, to keep it going.
not really a gun lesson, but an expired card and selling weed illegally to an informant, that was thought of as a friend. sucks, but these lessons are tough to learn for some. thanks for sharing.

Click to expand...

It wasn't a lazy public defender, it was a high priced criminal defense lawyer with a impressive record that was willing to take it too a jury but my friend would not take a chance on serious hard time, took the county time. Why would the lawyer lie about telling him the charges would have been worse with his card current?

no worries, lawyers only lie to clients, workmates, judges, and jurors, we're safe

illegally selling weed with an xpired card to a police informant is less charges/time
than illegally selling weed with a valid card to a police informant ?

can we check that??

your friends lawyer sucks ! high priced defense attorney working on a 4 gram sale of weed
and the dudes wifes cpl owned pistol(was he packing it during the sale I wonder?)
takes a plea and does time anyways? wtf

Federally, no..nope..not at all, state, sure. I dont know why no one cites the part of the mmma where it states no right or privelage shall be denied. Has it been used in court yet? I dont think so, none have had the balls to go through with a trial i guess, or just had incompetant lawyers.

aint the balls man, its the ridiculous attorney fees and shenanigans they play in marijuana court.


NO right/privi denied" is truth, but we dont expect an illegal act, like growing marijuana and guarding it with a gun, or lying on a federal form to change for pot? those laws in place long before marijuana. if we used illegal drugs we were not allowed to buy a gun right? even in 1990. nothign changed there I think, we just now notice how laws affect us, as cannabis users imo.

now, telling a person they cannot eat their medibles in their rental is unconcstitutional, and a great example of this notion.

pergamum362 said:

Federally, no..nope..not at all, state, sure. I dont know why no one cites the part of the mmma where it states no right or privelage shall be denied. Has it been used in court yet? I dont think so, none have had the balls to go through with a trial i guess, or just had incompetant lawyers.

Click to expand...

but the state is not charging us for guns and mj, the feds are, because its a fed law, like growing pot, states dont care, feds do.
so its a federal issue, not a state one. feds could car less about the status of your card, if there is a card, patients, permits etc.
feds would not use an informant buy of four grams of marijuana either. lawyer is a liar unless op was holding the wifes gun at the time, or branded it somehow, shod it to the narc etc. then, whats the beef really ? dude selling outside of his registry, doesnt know his own friends, and has an expired card. goofball is all, dime a dozen, tough to discern the law and its enforcement with these types, compared to those getting their guns returned when they show compliance

Well..i dont see the feds knocking on to many small household grows. What i have seen, is state prosecutors use that federal law to bully state compliant patients/caregivers into submiting to a plea deal.

pergamum362 said:

Well..i dont see the feds knocking on to many small household grows. What i have seen, is state prosecutors use that federal law to bully state compliant patients/caregivers into submiting to a plea deal.

Click to expand...

thats what I've missed. seeing that would change my opinions