Michelle Bachman Plans To Eliminate Pornography And Gays And Restore Slavery

*BUDS

*BUDS

Well-Known Member
i think she wants to put all the gays and the porn with the terrorists in guantanamo bay.
 
sync0s

sync0s

Well-Known Member
There was no talk of restoring slavery...

Lol @ whistle ass and hoping for higher unemployment

As embarrassed as I am, this proves Minnesotans are mildly retarded...

If more people knew about this, she would have completely lost gay vote, black vote, and all men votes... lol
 
deprave

deprave

New Member
yea sorry about that was stoned when I wrote that (still am) but
Sharia law - can replace slavery if I could edit the title
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I didn't actually hear any of the arguments Olberman made. Bachman may have said some BS things, but its been spun way out there. She never says"I hope unemployment increases so I can get elected" She never says Slaves had it better in 1860 either. Mostly Olberman putting words in her mouth and taking most things out of context.
 
plantvision

plantvision

Active Member
I agree spin doctors at work, but she is a bit of a loose cannon. And her husband is one of the biggest Medicare abusers also. As she professes health care reform her husband is ripping off the system.
 
Carne Seca

Carne Seca

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I didn't actually hear any of the arguments Olberman made. Bachman may have said some BS things, but its been spun way out there. She never says"I hope unemployment increases so I can get elected" She never says Slaves had it better in 1860 either. Mostly Olberman putting words in her mouth and taking most things out of context.
Click to expand...
She signed a pledge that said exactly that. A pledge she read through and signed with her very own paws.... er hands. And... To the previous poster... she never HAD the "gay" vote. The gay community knows exactly who she is and the damage her husband and his clinic does.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Carne Seca said:
She signed a pledge that said exactly that. A pledge she read through and signed with her very own paws.... er hands. And... To the previous poster... she never HAD the "gay" vote. The gay community knows exactly who she is and the damage her husband and his clinic does.
Click to expand...
What pledge? The one about slavery or the one about Gays?

BTW I don't see what the big deal is with gay Marriage. I mean NOTHING CHANGES, all your gonna do is pay more taxes and have some legal protections is all. big fucking deal.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
deprave said:
[video=youtube;-sViEHourgs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sViEHourgs[/video]

more info: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/07/bachmann-signs-pledge-for-ban-on-porn-and-same-sex-marriage.htmlhttp://wp.me/p1DM1G-dj & Sources
Does this include her husband lmao? 2 ez olberman 2 ez



Tea Party People There is only one canidate, his name ryhmes with Pon Raul

None Other then than the father of the tea party:

View attachment 1684079
Click to expand...
boy, olberman is such a good source of non-spun news. you should keep listening to him. he is so truthful, and has such a good head on his shoulders. he is certainly educating and informing the lefties very well......dopey
 
ink the world

ink the world

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
boy, olberman is such a good source of non-spun news. you should keep listening to him. he is so truthful, and has such a good head on his shoulders. he is certainly educating and informing the lefties very well......dopey
Click to expand...
Jeff, you might not appreciate the source but the info is spot on. Pretty much EVERY media outlet picked up on her signing that pledge, oh wait; I bet Fox didnt give it much air time...probably why you missed it right?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
kind of misleading title.

there was nothing in there about restoring slavery, just ignorance about slavery. i'm not sure where they found the stats that more slave kids had 2 parents than kids of today, but it is a shitty thing to say. it totally ignores that (even though it was illegal to do so) very young children were split apart from their families. whether they had two parents or not is pretty irrelevant when you are a slave.

bachmann and santorum are nucking futs.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
UncleBuck said:
kind of misleading title.

there was nothing in there about restoring slavery, just ignorance about slavery. i'm not sure where they found the stats that more slave kids had 2 parents than kids of today, but it is a shitty thing to say. it totally ignores that (even though it was illegal to do so) very young children were split apart from their families. whether they had two parents or not is pretty irrelevant when you are a slave.

bachmann and santorum are nucking futs.
Click to expand...
agreed....falls on floor....the point she fucked up is that black families were better off before the great society of johnson. after 40 years of social justice programming, the black family is poorer and less likely to come from a "normal" type family, two parents, out of wedlock births, abortions, way more of them are in jail percentage wise, more of them gunned down in black on black violence since the democrats of the inner cities built them 40 story cages to house them in. of course the dems called it "affordable" housing and such, but what it really is, is a giant cage to keep "those darkies" all in one easily controlled place.

no need for them darkies to be inhabiting our white liberal neighborhoods. only a liberal could look at a housing project and think it was gonna work real good.

that is what point needs to be made and it is easily provable. because these social programs have devistated the black family.

but she fucking blew it.
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
UncleBuck said:
kind of misleading title.

there was nothing in there about restoring slavery, just ignorance about slavery. i'm not sure where they found the stats that more slave kids had 2 parents than kids of today, but it is a shitty thing to say. it totally ignores that (even though it was illegal to do so) very young children were split apart from their families. whether they had two parents or not is pretty irrelevant when you are a slave.

bachmann and santorum are nucking futs.
Click to expand...
the one thing i take exception to slightly is that all slave owners were the same. they werent. and all slaves werent treated equally. and, the were other slaves besides blacks around the world. slavery as far as i remember was an african invention. i might be wrong but i think virtually every type persons were held as slaves. pols, irish, chinese....pretty much anyone who was a peasant under a king.

although it would be virtually impossble to know for sure, she may be right that the families structure was better. but as you said, its irrelevant.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jeff f said:
the one thing i take exception to slightly is that all slave owners were the same. they werent. and all slaves werent treated equally. and, the were other slaves besides blacks around the world. slavery as far as i remember was an african invention. i might be wrong but i think virtually every type persons were held as slaves. pols, irish, chinese....pretty much anyone who was a peasant under a king.

although it would be virtually impossble to know for sure, she may be right that the families structure was better. but as you said, its irrelevant.
Click to expand...
i'll give you a choice: two parents in a slave household, or one adoptive parent in a non-slave household. which one will you pick every time?
 
jeff f

jeff f

New Member
UncleBuck said:
i'll give you a choice: two parents in a slave household, or one adoptive parent in a non-slave household. which one will you pick every time?
Click to expand...
just as this post is irrelevant. we dont know, we only know some of the horror stories and some of the positive stories. i am not saying anything as to the validity of her statement, only that it is totaly irrelevant.

slavery was a worldwide pox on all peoples houses. currently its still a plague on certain black african society and arabic society. they are the only two who still currently own slaves.

and if you read and follow the forefathers words, they clearly were looking to eventualy try to elliminate the practice. many said it was an abominal practice. basically it was a black and white christian movement that lead the charge to abolish it.


but as i will say again, it has no relavence to the discussion in todays terms. but the social programs of the sixties should be front and center argument and i think conservatives could make a very good argument and win the issue
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top