Milovan
Well-Known Member
couldn't of said it better myselfWhile this is a very simple way of saying it, it's also spot on.
Personally, I am always ready to go back to full underground black market. So are all my old dealer friends.
couldn't of said it better myselfWhile this is a very simple way of saying it, it's also spot on.
Personally, I am always ready to go back to full underground black market. So are all my old dealer friends.
Decriminalization and education. Relieve them of the fear that they have about MMJ and teach them how to grow their own. That's what I see as a alternative.Dan, you keep saying dispensaries are unnecessary, but you won't suggest an alternative way for patients to acquire medication. I don't think your opinion holds any weight until you suggest a reasonable alternative.
I could care less about profits. I don't sell my meds for pure profit. Most of the time I take what's offered or they get it for free. I "donated" over a lb to patients from my last seasons grow and made less than it would cost you to buy a zip in the dispensary. So money is not my motivation.That is an option for some people, but in general that is pretty fantastical. Indoor gardening is intense, requires lots of knowledge, time and gear, and again, can fail at any point, leaving patients without medication. Outdoor has its difficulties too, with the limitation of one or two crops a year, again, both of which can fail.
Wishing dispensaries away to increase your profit margin on street sales is pretty ugly, but go for it, but doing it under the guise of helping patients is downright gross.
Actually I have. Private collectives/delivery services. Not as convenient as dispensaries, but dispensaries are becoming more of a burden than a convenience due to lack of competition.Dan, you keep saying dispensaries are unnecessary, but you won't suggest an alternative way for patients to acquire medication. I don't think your opinion holds any weight until you suggest a reasonable alternative.
That depends on what the numbers look like. If dispensaries were eliminated growers could make more money while charging patients less. Right now the price of bud for patients is at an artificially high rate because a small number of dispensaries are controlling most of the medical marijuana market. A non-dispensary based market eliminates that because it allows basically anyone to start their own collective without be subjected to heavy handed regulations.Wishing dispensaries away to increase your profit margin on street sales is pretty ugly, but go for it, but doing it under the guise of helping patients is downright gross.
If dispensaries end, collectives are still legal, probably more so since there will be no confusion about what a medical marijuana collective consists of. Right now law enforcement are having it both ways, when they bust a dispensary, they claim 215 doesn't make dispensaries legal, only collectives. But then when they bust a private collective, the call it illegal drug dealing and point to the dispensaries as what a legal collective is. If they rule one way or the other on the legalities of dispensaries, the question of what a medical collective is will be answered.I don't know... It seems like at least part of the reason the prices are low is because of the dispensaries. Before the dispensaries we were getting 4k a pack, and had no shortage of buyers. If all the clubs are gone, we're back to the beginning. No? Or is this what Oregon is doing?
Nixon tried that and it failed miserably.I came up with the idea that if the government wanted to stop dispensaries all they would have to do is set a price or cap on what they can charge for meds. The feds could just cap a price. An example $10 an 1/8th. The true cost to grow. That would put dispensaries out of business or atleast most of them. It's not what I think they should do, it's what they could do. A donation is a bullshit term, a true donation is at cost.
Yo, can you explain that?
Google Nixon Price ControlsAs Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman correctly predicted, however, Nixon's gambit ended "in utter failure and the emergence into the open of the suppressed inflation."
The people would pay the price — but not until after he'd coasted to a landslide re-election in 1972 over Democratic Sen. George McGovern.
By the time Nixon reimposed a temporary freeze in June 1973, Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw explain in The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy, it was obvious that price controls didn't work: "Ranchers stopped shipping their cattle to the market, farmers drowned their chickens, and consumers emptied the shelves of supermarkets."
Google Nixon Price Controls
The solution to high prices driven by high demand is more supply and more competition.
I don't think you're grasping the important part... it doesn't matter what the product is. Price fixing doesn't work. It doesn't matter your reason why.lol. I think you missed the whole point. It's hard to converse with people that are stoned. The whole point of the feds to destroy dispensaries, would be to make it fail by fixing the price of pot.
I agree. The only way to fix the prices is let dispensaries open on every corner or shut them all down and let everyone have private collectives. Either way the answer is more competition.I don't think you're grasping the important part... it doesn't matter what the product is. Price fixing doesn't work. It doesn't matter your reason why.