I've tested the original UFO, and just about every LED to grace the pages of high times since. The procyon, the Growl LED's, Super LED, the Illuminators and the newest eBay Tri-Band UFO's. My only problem with these are that their obviously made in the same chinese factories as the rest yet are claimed to be more efficient due to the fact the LED's are spread out a little on the board. To me the 318w is just as efficient as a 400w and shouldn't be claimed to be any better. That's right they don't produce nugs as FULL as those grown under HID. And of course when you grow with hydro your yield is higher, but then you get even more dense nugs because the light your using? No thanks I don't want moldy dense nugs. A heat signature of a uncooled 600w HPS is not even more than a human body.. If someone is using thermal imaging out of a bond movie maybe then will they notice the heat from the light. I think it's a shame that your trying to scam people on these forums and take their money.
Wow, the scum of the internet has slimily made it's way to RIU. What a shame, as I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say that we don't want your kind here. We've all seen your type: "I've tried everything, and got screwed on all of it, so my ego's crushed and there is no way that anyone will ever convince me again that they are smarter than someone else."
What I find funny, is how you make a complete ass out of yourself on here... You talk about a Tri-band on eBay!?!? LMFAO!!! You were tricked into buying that how? Oh ya, by your own lack of judgment and research, not because someone sold you on it or proved it worked ahead of time (again LMFAO). So you spent money testing what seems like thousands of dollars of useless grow lights, so you come on here crying about how mad you are? Then you try to attack me, since you obviously can't attack those scam companies you've been supporting... My god, I think anyone can see through you here...
You think my lights are more efficient because I spaced them out? Sorry, that just gives me a larger coverage area with a 60 degree LED. My lights ARE MADE IN CHINA, although there are literally 100+ factories that make them, so my lights don't come from the same place as everyone else (although I have no problems saying they are made in China). Another thing, if my lights ARE THE SAME, why is it that NO OTHER LIGHT IN THE WORLD, looks like mine does? Who cares if it's made in the same country, does that mean that all people in any given country, do everything the same? What, you think that I didn't do all the research, testing, and light design state-side? The reason my lights are so efficient, is because we give you the full spectral output that NO OTHER manufacturer does (especially none of the ones you listed). We also use 60 degree LED's, instead of the BS 120 degree LED's like everyone else, to direct the light at your plants in an intense beam that can penetrate. That's why they work better, it's not because of spacing. SIMPLE design points that other companies just can't seem to figure out...
Lastly, you contradict yourself. First you tell people that my 318W light compares to a 400W HID (of course this is completely false), and then you tell people that MY LIGHTS don't produce nugs as big or full as HID!?!? DID ANYONE ELSE FORGET THAT THIS JOKE has never used my lights? Funny how he can make such slanderous accusations about how my lights function, when he's never seen them operate... Then you tell people my yield is higher, and that I have more dense nugs, but you claim they have MOLD??? Dude, go crawl under a rock where you belong.
By the way, does anyone believe this guy when he says that the human body has the same heat signature as a 450 degree HPS bulb? My god I can't believe the shit people spew...
I read somewhere that your working on a "next generation" light.. So why are you still selling these if their not up to par with what's going to be coming out soon? Can't we all just accept LED is not what it claims to be as far as 1000w equivalency or even 400w equivalency on your 126w. A 126w LED is barely comparable with a 150w HPS in flower from what can be seen in grow journals, just depending who the grower is. And of course if you want more yield grow Hydro. kiss-assThe people who you've given free lights to haven't been all that happy anyway.. Aside from the high of getting free supplemental lighting.
Again, making false, BS accusations, with nothing to back yourself up. But that's how people like you operate. Information doesn't have to be right, hell you don't even care if you sound like a moron, you're still pissed that you spent soo much testing these other LED's, and now I have customers destroying their 150W HPS with my 63W light. Would you mind showing people, VIA ONLINE RESULTS, where my 126W only compares to a 150W HPS??? That's right, YOU CAN'T.
I find it amazing that somehow you don't understand time. I'm working on a future model which takes TIME. So I'm supposed to stop everything dead in my tracks, because in the future something better will get released? How many screws do you have loos anyways? I'll be making a PRO model light, that DOES NOT mean I won't be carrying my current models anymore, it means there will be a higher quality model available, with a higher lumen output, for those who can afford it.
And Again, I've supplied ONE person with free lights, and his name is Ed Rosenthal. His results haven't been published, nor started, so how is it you say he isn't happy with my lights? There is no one else I've given anything to, and the people who are using my lights, and are posting results, are doing nothing but praising the product. What's funny is that people like you will continue to disbelieve everyone, even when there are 100+ people claiming the same, awesome results using my lights.
I'm sorry if you just can't bear to see a smart woman succeed. It's not my fault the other people who designed the lights you wasted money on, lacked my intelligence. You've been reported, now get off the thread or quit acting like an asshole.
