Red1966
Well-Known Member
" too invested in his idiotic position to ever admit he's wrong"....lol
Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.
- Thread starter jahbrudda
- Start date
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
That's how science works, see, if something were to come along and change the scientific consensus, I'd change my opinion along with it, because I realize I'm not smarter than the collective of tens of thousands of people with advanced scientific degrees who study the shit day in day out
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
and how many have NOT endorsed this untestable unproveable theory?
lol seriously, you think No Opinion on an issue like this is a Yes Vote?
do try to be less facile.
science academies and scientists rarely come out and declare something is bullshit.
they only do so when they can prove it's bullshit, but the AGW/ACC/Whatever Acronym is Fashionable This Week bullshit is so vague and untestable it's almost impossible to prove, and entirely impossible to disprove.
you are engaging in the Appeal To Authority, God of the Gaps, and No True Scotsman fallacies all at once.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
How many have said it's a hoax? How many have even disagreed with the consensus?
You think 'no stance' means no
I think 'no stance' means... no stance
lmfao
Prove that's what they think or shut your lying cockholster
All credible scientists accept the theory of gravity, I accept it too, I guess I'm appealing to authority there, too, huh, retard?
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
the "theory of gravity" is not a nebulous series of claims based on secret data, arcane mathematical assumptions, flawed computer models and assholes who jink with the numbers and alter data to make their claims seem plausible, while backpedaling furiously.
you are now engaging in reductio ad retardum.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
There is nothing secret about ACC
The computer models aren't flawed
The individuals involved in 'climategate' were exonerated by 8 individual independent investigations into wrongdoing
& you can't stand any of it
Try again
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!
somebody doesnt read reports or understand the material.
hint: it's YOU!
secret data is key to AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail
the models are 100% non-predictive, dont account for dozens of major weather/climate factors, and have consistently failed to produce useful results.
Climategate scammers were "exonerated" by a coverup.
one of em was "exonerated" by a panel from U Penn, who also "Exonerated" joe paterno, shortly before he was convicted of kiddy diddling.
Climategate 2, Scientific Fraud Boogaloo is still being fought in the courts as the participants claim "trade secrets" and "commercial interests" to prevent the DA from seeing their bullshit data.
numerous well respected climatologists have stated emphatically that AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail is a politically motivated scheme, and scientifically invalid.
the key players in AGW/ACC/New Bullshit Acronym Every Time The Models Fail hucksterism have indicted their agenda from their own mouths (as previously stated in detail in previous threads on this subject) and fools like you think wikipedia is the Source Authority on the IPCC's backpedalling claims.
heckler73
Well-Known Member
Which one of those have you read?
This is what the Energy Budget looks like according to Salby:
This is what it looks like to you:
cultSCIENCE!!!!!111!@
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
That's why every single thing about it is transparent, huh...
Must be why the worlds majority of climate experts accept ACC...
CONSPIRACZY!!!! COVERUP!@@@@ 9/11!!!!!!
HOAXORZ!!!!!
FYI, nobody who says that is "well respected" in the scientific community
HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAXES!!!!!
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
the one that says CO2 is a greenhouse gas
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
If ACC is real, why did ACC "scientists" put temperature measuring devices at the site of an airport?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Just to confuse you and the rest of the Tea Party retards
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Here all this time I thought it was slight of hand trickery so dum dum liberals can have talking points and conservatives can say say, "nuh uh, god did bitches." And conclude with a sing along from Veggie Tales.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Nope, it was to confuse Tea Party retards all along. Also to harness HAARP and stifle chemtrails and convince the public 9/11 was an inside job while simultaneously propping up Al Gore as the ACC hero of the universe and save the polar bears and panda bears from extinction because we think they're so cute!
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
What you smoking right now? Mine is nowhere near as good.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
ever so mildly retouched.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Because his original quote stole your position.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
guess he's getting tired of all the sock puppets you employ to make it look like others share your delusions and agree with your lies.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you're saying NASA is just being a "huckster" here?
you're positing that this is all some sort of a hoax?
what if phillipe rushton endorsed the theory, would you believe it then?
