Lumens For The Layman... Your First Grow Light

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
Hello again.

So you've read through this thread:
https://www.rollitup.org/t/nutrients-for-noobs-making-it-through-your-first-grow.850705/

You have your dirt and your go-go juice ready. You've got twenty-four 2-gallon grow bags, and you have your grandma's antique bed lamp hanging upside down in your closet... time to pop some beans. Right?

no.jpg

Slow down there...

(Disclaimer*- This is not meant to be a terribly in-depth or end-all-be-all post, but I hope it helps clear up some things for the grower with zero knowledge or experience at all in growing indoors. Do your research.)

First off, granny's lamp ain't gonna do the job. Those round lights you've seen for 55 years? Yeah those don't work. At all. No, seriously... put the 55-pack you got at Sam's Club down... turning your closet into Liberace's dressing room isn't going to grow anything.

To start off, let's narrow down your choices and then we can go from there into a little more detail. Your common choices you will be dealing with are:

CFL/Tubes
HPS
MH
LED

Pick one and make sure you love it, because your lighting is probably going to be your most expensive investment aside from maybe your tent.

Each light has different pros and cons to them... and literally, each one produces a different type of light.

The "color" (or wavelength, really) of light is measured in temperature, specifically Kelvins. The higher the K number, the more blue. The lower, the more red. Each color also has certain benefits to them.

Blues tend to promote more vegetative growth, promote shorter node length (less stretching), and help promote higher resin production.

Red light tends to be better for bud production.

Either can work the whole way through. Just ask the guys that flower with MHs, or the guys that veg with HPS. It will all work, and a lot of people will start with a blue MH or CFL/Tube for vegging and then move to a more red/yellow HPS for flower. It's all growers preference.

CFLs and Tubes can be purchased in either 2700k or 6400k temperatures (or close variations of those). HPS are usually in the 2300k range, and MH can range from 4000k-5500k depending on what you buy.

Remember, the lower the number, the more red... better for flower.
The higher the number, the more blue... better for veg.

So let's see what each one has to offer...

---

CFL/Tubes

Pros:
Dirt cheap (for CFLs, tubes can get expensive, fast)
Cheap and easy to replace
Can maneuver around your plants in ways other lights can't
You can mix your spectrums easily
Awesome for seedling/clones/vegging

Aaaaand, that's about it really. They are flimsy, a pain in the ass to get around, burn the shit out of you when your are trying to check trichomes... and yet that's still what I use. I'm cheap, what's your excuse?

Cons:
All of the above
Lower yields
Less lumens per watt than any other lighting available (more on that later)
Have to stay close to the plants
Can be almost as expensive as an HID (in the case of some of the higher-priced T5 fixtures/etc)
Lose efficiency after only a few months (no, just because your lights are shining, doesn't mean the light is the same as it was 6 months ago)
Can be as hot or hotter than well-cooled HIDs
Have almost zero light penetration (light isn't getting past the first two leaves, sorry)
There's others, believe me... the list is getting long enough.

But they do work, and they work well if you know how to use them. Notice in the Cons I didn't say anything about quality. I will put my CFL buds up against anyone else's buds any day. Just don't expect huge commercial yields out of them. I get a little less than a QP every six weeks out of my 400w of CFLs that I spent $40 on. That works for me. Others want a lot more. For those that do, there is the HID route, so let's look at those.

HIDs - High Intensity Discharge

So here's the money-makers for most people. If you are going for monster commercial crops, chances are that you have looked up which 1000w HPS/MH you are going to put on your Christmas list.

We've already talked about the colors they produce, but (as you know if you have shopped around) they also come in a bajillion different watts and set-ups. And yes, I've counted, and that is a scientific number... a bajillion combinations.

HPS

The Godfather of growing ganja. The tried and true way for most commercial growers (and a lot of smaller scale growers also) to light up their lives.

Pros:
Bigger buds
Can be purchased in many different watt sizes tailored for your size
Bigger buds
One light - You won't be fighting to get around your twenty CFLs
Better penetration than CFLs or Tubes
Last longer without losing efficiency
Easy to install and maintain
One light - You will be moving one light up and down and not twenty
Bigger buds
And finally - Bigger buds.

Notice a few of those are on there twice. I felt the need to point those out a little.

Cons:
Can be hotter than CFLs or tubes - (can be, CFLs are hot as hell also, and a well-cooled and vented HPS can actually run cooler in your tent than twenty open-air CFLs...)
Can be expensive - Compared to CFLs they are expensive, but some Tube fluoros can run you almost as much as a small HPS setup
Only one spectrum
Your pictures will look like ass
Hoods can be heavy (especially small built-in-ballast types)
Light only comes from one direction
Usually need to be placed farther away from plants (more stretching)
Bigger buds... oh wait, wrong list.

As you can see, HPS have a lot going for them, and that's why a lot of people use them. Proven, and easy to maintain, these are most growers go-to light for flowering.


MH

Pros:
See HPS
Slightly better resin production
Tighter nodes on plants (less stretch)
Bigger buds than CFLs

Cons:
See HPS
Slightly smaller buds than HPS
Pictures will look slightly less like ass

The difference between MH and HPS basically boils down to the difference in the 2700k and 6400k CFLs we were talking about earlier. They are both systems that will give you great penetration, and can be used throughout the grow process. In the simplest terms: MH are better for vegging but can still flower a plant, and HPS are better for flowering a plant but can still veg one. Both will produce great bud.

LED

Pros:
Arrays and wavelengths can be tailored to your specific grow, or however you want them set up
Pictures will look like the teleport room from Star Trek.

Cons:
New technology that people are still working out. Even a decade later, you are still basically a test monkey for the newest LED array.

I don't know much about LEDs, so I am going to leave this mainly blank.

---

Now that you know a little more about the lights (and by a little, I mean go do some damn research before you lay down $200+ on your grow light...) let's look at how much light you are going to need.

Ideally, you want to be looking to hit around 10,000 lumens in every area of your canopy. What is a lumen? A lumen is a measure of the amount of visible light that something produces. I am not going to get too deep into the Lumen vs Par topic, but if you want a little more info on that, a good read can be found here:
https://www.thcfarmer.com/community/threads/lumens-are-for-people-par-is-for-plants-and-a-lot-of-other-lighting-spectrum-info.37783/
I don't want to steal his work and it's easier to copy and paste a link anyways. Do some clicking and reading :)

If you are growing with CFLs... buy as much as your heat will allow. Yes, CFLs get hot. I have 400w in my tent (300w for flower, 100w to get my clones going),and it gets hot. It's not the lights I can't afford at this point, it's the heat. At the point I am at, an HID would be much better for me. Take that into account when purchasing CFLs. They are cheap, and great to start with, but don't realistically expect to run a 1000w CFL tent.

Also, be careful when buying CFLs. Those "150w equiv" lights are really about 23watts. Look on the box for the lumen output of your CFLs. Most 23watt CFLs produce about 1600 lumens. Remember though, that 1600 lumens is only good for about 3"-4" max from the bulb. After that it drops, and it drops fast.

General rule of thumb... every 100w (true watts) of CFL produce between 6000-7000 lumens. Generally, you will need about 100w of CFL per square foot, unless you get creative in your layout.

-continued-
 
Last edited:

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
So what about the HID lighting? Since they come in select sizes, let's look at a few charts. I've had these forever and no idea where they came from. Credit to the author...

HPS

hpslumens1.png
MH


mhlumens1.png
Going by these charts, you can easily see how many lumens you can roughly expect out of each size HID light (initial lumens are on the top above the wattage). The numbers cascading represent the drop in foot-candles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot-candle) your plants are receiving at varying heights. The size *You* will need, will be determined by the size of the area you want to grow in, the number of plants, how tall your room is, and how much heat you can vent out of your room.

In general, at optimal heights and before light starts diminishing, a 600w will cover a 3x3 or 4x4 area... and a 1000w will cover a 4x4 or a 5x5 area. It will all depend on your heat and ventilation. That will keep you close to your 10,000 lumen goal.

Remember though, that height matters, even for HID lights. Even for a 1000w HPS, you can see in the chart that at 2-feet (24 inches), you are only getting about 10,000 foot-candles out of your initial 100,000 lumen potential. Just because you can fit a 1000w light 6-feet above your plants, doesn't mean that a 400w light 6-inches from your plants won't be four times better for you.

You can also use a small 150w HPS to flower a couple plants in a small cabinet or tent if you have the ventilation for it. And of course you also have the option of running two 600w lights instead of one 1000w light (which a lot of growers are now doing). Or you have the option of using a 600w HPS with 100w of side CFL lighting. Or the option of... well... as you can see, your options are about limitless. Your lighting arrangement is going to be dictated by your area size, the amount you want to yield, and ultimately, the amount you want to pay.

And remember... these are just guidelines. Do some research before you blow grammy's Christmas money on that fancy 70w LED array.
 
Last edited:

howsitgrowin420

Well-Known Member
you could include some information on what accounts for the price differences in HID bulbs if you wanted to. Obviously, LED information would be awesome - I think about switching each time my electric bill comes in.
 

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
you could include some information on what accounts for the price differences in HID bulbs if you wanted to. Obviously, LED information would be awesome - I think about switching each time my electric bill comes in.
As for the electric bill...

Watts are watts. 400w of LED cost the same as 400w of HPS cost the same as 400w of CFL.

The lumens-per-watt you get will be different, but the bill is the same.

As for LED's... I would rather give no info than bad info. I've never personally seen them used. I don't have any first-hand experience with them. Just being honest.
 

howsitgrowin420

Well-Known Member
As for the electric bill...

Watts are watts. 400w of LED cost the same as 400w of HPS cost the same as 400w of CFL.

The lumens-per-watt you get will be different, but the bill is the same.

As for LED's... I would rather give no info than bad info. I've never personally seen them used. I don't have any first-hand experience with them. Just being honest.
Whatever dude, I'm not a fucking retard I know that watts cost the same whether they are feeding an LED a CFL or an HID. Let me fucking spell it out so as not to have elementary shit explained to me like "watts are watts". 'I think about finding lower consumption growing power equivalent to my 2400w of HPS every time my electric bill comes in - to me this is the greatest appeal of switching to LEDs, a light source rumored to have lower power consumption with similar growing ability.'

Maybe you didn't understand that I was talking about two different things. 1) information on the price differences WITHIN hid lighting (i.e., digilux vs. chinese factory crank them out as fast as you can lights) and 2) LED information. The comment about my electric bill was just to provide some social validity for adding LED information - the only information that would be a novel contribution to the area of lighting these days.
 

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
Whatever dude, I'm not a fucking retard I know that watts cost the same whether they are feeding an LED a CFL or an HID. Let me fucking spell it out so as not to have elementary shit explained to me like "watts are watts". 'I think about finding lower consumption growing power equivalent to my 2400w of HPS every time my electric bill comes in - to me this is the greatest appeal of switching to LEDs, a light source rumored to have lower power consumption with similar growing ability.'

Maybe you didn't understand that I was talking about two different things. 1) information on the price differences WITHIN hid lighting (i.e., digilux vs. chinese factory crank them out as fast as you can lights) and 2) LED information. The comment about my electric bill was just to provide some social validity for adding LED information - the only information that would be a novel contribution to the area of lighting these days.
I understand what you are saying and what you are asking for... but like I have stated a few times now:

I really don't know much about LEDs. I can't give opinions on whether 400w of LED can replace your 1000w of HPS. Again, I would rather give no information than bad information.

And sorry if I offended you with the watt vs watt statement. I didn't know you meant to clarify the difference in HPS ballasts/manufacturers. That was my bad.

No need to get so offensive. :hug:
 

howsitgrowin420

Well-Known Member
I understand what you are saying and what you are asking for... but like I have stated a few times now:

I really don't know much about LEDs. I can't give opinions on whether 400w of LED can replace your 1000w of HPS. Again, I would rather give no information than bad information.

And sorry if I offended you with the watt vs watt statement. I didn't know you meant to clarify the difference in HPS ballasts/manufacturers. That was my bad.

No need to get so offensive. :hug:
Then I still have no idea why you felt the need to tell me that watts are watts - you obviously made an assumption that I did not know that watts cost the same. "as for the electric bill...watts are watts" in response to "I think about switching every time my electric bill comes". But again, you focused on the very least important portion of my response. Your post sounds like you think there would be no difference in power consumption between LEDs and CFLs.


Like I've stated a few times now, something you could do to make this post better would be to describe the difference within BULBS (I don't know who said ballasts/manufacturers and perhaps we could avoid these clarifications with a little more thorough reading).
 

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
Then I still have no idea why you felt the need to tell me that watts are watts - you obviously made an assumption that I did not know that watts cost the same. "as for the electric bill...watts are watts" in response to "I think about switching every time my electric bill comes". But again, you focused on the very least important portion of my response. Your post sounds like you think there would be no difference in power consumption between LEDs and CFLs.


Like I've stated a few times now, something you could do to make this post better would be to describe the difference within BULBS (I don't know who said ballasts/manufacturers and perhaps we could avoid these clarifications with a little more thorough reading).
Bulbs specifically have the watt and lumen rating on them. That is not hidden information. If they can't look that up before buying (like I say in the OP... do your research) then that is on them.

The only hidden power draw you are going to get from a HPS is going to be from the ballast. A bulb is a bulb. The lumens may be different, but that's easy info to find.
 

howsitgrowin420

Well-Known Member
ok, then there is absolutely nothing you can do to make this post better.

You are saying that the only difference in price comes from initial lumen rating.....ok.... http://growershouse.com/blog/hid-bulb-test-comparison-review-hortilux-ushio-digilux-baddass-solistek-lumatek-maxlume-growlite-ultra-sun/

I am realizing that your powers of reading comprehension are significantly lacking to be participating in a written forum. I wish that I could go back and not make a comment about my electric bill because that is the only thing that you can see now and your little brain is attempting to jam power consumption into everything you read now. The only person talking about differences in power consumption in HPS systems is you.

Basically you asked "what can I do to make the post better" and I said "1) talk about differences between bulbs and 2) include the LED information that you said you weren't going to read up on and summarize for us" The comment about the electric bill was just to lighten up what I was actually trying to say which was "this contains little new information"....and now I'm apparently getting a lesson as to how LED is not cheaper than HPS....I'm out.
 

TheYokel

Well-Known Member
ok, then there is absolutely nothing you can do to make this post better.

You are saying that the only difference in price comes from initial lumen rating.....ok.... http://growershouse.com/blog/hid-bulb-test-comparison-review-hortilux-ushio-digilux-baddass-solistek-lumatek-maxlume-growlite-ultra-sun/

I am realizing that your powers of reading comprehension are significantly lacking to be participating in a written forum. I wish that I could go back and not make a comment about my electric bill because that is the only thing that you can see now and your little brain is attempting to jam power consumption into everything you read now. The only person talking about differences in power consumption in HPS systems is you.

Basically you asked "what can I do to make the post better" and I said "1) talk about differences between bulbs and 2) include the LED information that you said you weren't going to read up on and summarize for us" The comment about the electric bill was just to lighten up what I was actually trying to say which was "this contains little new information"....and now I'm apparently getting a lesson as to how LED is not cheaper than HPS....I'm out.
Wow... some people just aren't happy with the answer: "I don't know enough about LEDs to comment".
 

howsitgrowin420

Well-Known Member
It seems like you don't know enough about HID to comment either, but you did anyway. If that's the case, then I can't understand refraining from commenting on LEDs.
 

Sow to Grow

Well-Known Member
I suggest qualifying the conversation using photo flux instead of lumens. Lumens are for humans, photosynthetic photon flux is for plants. I think laymen can grasp the concept. The layman is going to have to talk about light quality (spectrum) as well as light intensity (PPF).

The conversation of lighting should include spectral distribution curves and the different spectrums coming out of different light sources. 350 PPFD from an LED fixture will not produce the same plant response as 350 PPFD from another light source. And because LED fixtures are comprised of combinations of narrow-band colors, different color mixes between LED fixtures will also affect plant responses differently.

Take a look at this graph that measures the amount of lights (photosynthetic photon flux) against the photosynthetic rate. It's clear that the plant is responding differently. The LED fixture used in the study is an optimized mix of blue, white and red diodes. Remember that it's not the technology but the spectrum that is affecting the outcome. If someone used LEDs to model an HPS spectrum, you'd probably get a similar plant response.

 
Top