The topic is HID lighting.
Hello everyone,
I've been trying to do some research on lighting but I'm finding it difficult to locate useful information. The problem I run into is that the recommended lighting does not really match up with the botanical data I've found. This has raised a lot of questions for me, and I'm hoping I've come to the right place for answers.
The most common use of HID lighting (from what I've seen) would be MH for vegetative growth, and HPS for flowering.
Why is it that HPS is better for flower?
The only answer I've been able to find to this question is that HPS better simulates the fall sun which tends to be more red in color. While I understand the basic logic of this, trying to replicate nature, I don't see the actual benefits. If the stimulus to initiate (and maintain) flower is a minimum of 12 hours of darkness per 24 hr cycle, why deprive the plant of the higher quality light for the sake of mimicking a duller sun?
Peak absorption for chlorophyll a is 430nm in the blue range and 662nm in the red. Chlorophyll b has peak absorption at 453nm and 642nm. For both a & b the absorption range is much higher, and broader, in the blue range than in the red. Are there any benefits specific to the red and blue spectrum other than absorption?
From what I have gathered, it is better to use a very blue MH, not just for vegetative cycles, but for flower as well. Unfortunately, this contradicts what I have read on hydroponic forums and products sold from vendors. Most MH lights available from hydroponic suppliers fall into the 5000k to 5500k range, but it seems the best distribution comes from a 6,500k MH bulb (which I can't even find in a wattage >400). If switching bulbs between veg and flower is beneficial, wouldn't it be better to go from 6500k MH to 5000k MH?
Sorry my first post is a novel of interrogation, I'd just like to better understand the light needs of our plants.
Hello everyone,
I've been trying to do some research on lighting but I'm finding it difficult to locate useful information. The problem I run into is that the recommended lighting does not really match up with the botanical data I've found. This has raised a lot of questions for me, and I'm hoping I've come to the right place for answers.
The most common use of HID lighting (from what I've seen) would be MH for vegetative growth, and HPS for flowering.
Why is it that HPS is better for flower?
The only answer I've been able to find to this question is that HPS better simulates the fall sun which tends to be more red in color. While I understand the basic logic of this, trying to replicate nature, I don't see the actual benefits. If the stimulus to initiate (and maintain) flower is a minimum of 12 hours of darkness per 24 hr cycle, why deprive the plant of the higher quality light for the sake of mimicking a duller sun?
Peak absorption for chlorophyll a is 430nm in the blue range and 662nm in the red. Chlorophyll b has peak absorption at 453nm and 642nm. For both a & b the absorption range is much higher, and broader, in the blue range than in the red. Are there any benefits specific to the red and blue spectrum other than absorption?
From what I have gathered, it is better to use a very blue MH, not just for vegetative cycles, but for flower as well. Unfortunately, this contradicts what I have read on hydroponic forums and products sold from vendors. Most MH lights available from hydroponic suppliers fall into the 5000k to 5500k range, but it seems the best distribution comes from a 6,500k MH bulb (which I can't even find in a wattage >400). If switching bulbs between veg and flower is beneficial, wouldn't it be better to go from 6500k MH to 5000k MH?
Sorry my first post is a novel of interrogation, I'd just like to better understand the light needs of our plants.