light

fat sam

Well-Known Member
i would go with the ufo as it has almost twice the power, im not so sure about the tri-band thing, from what i have seen is that led's use only 2 colors, the reds and a few blues so it seems like the 3rd color is a waste of time, go with the ufo i would say but if your really concerned about bang for the buck then an hps is the light for you
 

itsgrowinglikeaweed

Well-Known Member
I dont think either one of those is worth that kind of coin. Not even close! Do you realize how many CFL's with just as good a spectrum you can get for that kind of money. I dont see any #of lumens in either of those adds. Hmmm wonder why. because the # would be VERY low compared to the lighting that most people are familiar with. i know theres is more to it than lumens.
Just asking but have you ever grown with CFL's? They work A LOT better than most people would have you believe. I'd love to see or hear about some results using LEDS. But right now there is no way in hell to justify the cost of those units. If you want to be the guinea pig. I applaud you. Cant wait to hear what the others think. I'm not feeling those at all. LOL you can get a proven 55,000 lumen set up for the cost of one of those.
 

sirbudmaster

Well-Known Member
i say buy it! start up a journal, and show us how its done from start to finish. I would not waste my money or time in these......but you can bongsmilie


peace
 
Top